Motorola Razr 70 Ultra vs Nothing Phone (3a) Lite
The Motorola Razr 70 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, while the Nothing Phone (3a) Lite (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Pro; launch prices were $1099 and $249. By overall MobileRank rating, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra leads — 80/100 vs 52/100 (a 28-point difference). Key differences: the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (3,942,923 vs 884,207); the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra is thinner (7.2mm vs 8.3mm).
Motorola Razr 70 Ultra
Nothing Phone (3a) Lite
- Higher AnTuTu: 3942923 vs 884207
- Better Geekbench Single: 3640 vs 1011
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11033 vs 2813
- Faster charging: 68W vs 45W
- Higher refresh rate: 165Hz vs 120Hz
- Higher performance (98/100 vs 55/100)
- Better camera (60/100 vs 35/100)
- Longer battery life (61/100 vs 48/100)
- Better display (95/100 vs 79/100)
- Better portability (68/100 vs 56/100)
- Cheaper at launch: $249 vs $1099
- Overall rating 52/100
Comparing the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra vs the Nothing Phone (3a) Lite, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra scores 28 points higher (80/100 vs 52/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra leads (98/100 vs 55/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra leads (60/100 vs 35/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra leads (61/100 vs 48/100). Value score: Motorola Razr 70 Ultra — 72/100, Nothing Phone (3a) Lite — 58/100; it is biased by price level, so it should not be compared directly between devices at different prices. In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nothing Phone (3a) Lite (98/100 vs 55/100). In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra notably outperforms the Nothing Phone (3a) Lite (95/100 vs 79/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra notably outperforms the Nothing Phone (3a) Lite (60/100 vs 35/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra is a bit better (61/100 vs 48/100). In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra is a bit better (68/100 vs 56/100).
| Specification | Motorola Razr 70 Ultra | Nothing Phone (3a) Lite | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Pro | |
| AnTuTu | 3942923 | 884207 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3640 | 1011 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 11033 | 2813 | |
| Display | 7.0" pOLED | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1224x2992 | 2392x1080 | |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 68W | 45W | |
| Wireless charging | 15W | 0W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 8 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 16 MP | |
| RAM | 16GB | 8GB | |
| Storage | 512GB | 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 15 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 5000 nits | 3000 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP48 | IP54 | |
| Dimensions | 171.5×74.0×7.2 mm | 164.0×78.0×8.3 mm | |
| Weight | 199 g | 199 g | |
| Launch price | $1099 | $249 |
Motorola Razr 70 Ultra
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Nothing Phone (3a) Lite
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 16MP
Motorola Razr 70 Ultra
- 7.0" pOLED
- Resolution: 1224x2992
- Refresh rate: 165 Hz
Nothing Phone (3a) Lite
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 2392x1080
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Motorola Razr 70 Ultra
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 68W
- Wireless: 15W
Nothing Phone (3a) Lite
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- No wireless charging
We compared Motorola Razr 70 Ultra and Nothing Phone (3a) Lite, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Motorola Razr 70 Ultra leads Nothing Phone (3a) Lite by 345.9% in our overall performance rating.
Launch price difference: $850. Nothing Phone (3a) Lite was $850 cheaper at launch.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nothing Phone (3a) Lite (98/100 vs 55/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra notably outperforms the Nothing Phone (3a) Lite (95/100 vs 79/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra notably outperforms the Nothing Phone (3a) Lite (60/100 vs 35/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra is a bit better (61/100 vs 48/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra is a bit better (68/100 vs 56/100).
Which is better: the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra or the Nothing Phone (3a) Lite?
The Motorola Razr 70 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nothing Phone (3a) Lite by 28 points (80/100 vs 52/100).
What is the rating of the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra and the Nothing Phone (3a) Lite?
The Motorola Razr 70 Ultra has a MobileRank rating of 80/100, the Nothing Phone (3a) Lite — 52/100.
Which has the better camera: the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra or the Nothing Phone (3a) Lite?
The Motorola Razr 70 Ultra leads on camera score (60/100 vs 35/100).
Which is more powerful: the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra or the Nothing Phone (3a) Lite?
The Motorola Razr 70 Ultra leads on performance (98/100 vs 55/100).
Should you choose the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra over the Nothing Phone (3a) Lite?
The Motorola Razr 70 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users. The Nothing Phone (3a) Lite is a better fit for everyday use.