Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 vs Nothing Phone (3a) Lite
The Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the Nothing Phone (3a) Lite (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Pro; launch prices were $1499 and $249. By overall MobileRank rating, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 leads — 78/100 vs 52/100 (a 26-point difference). Key differences: the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 is faster in AnTuTu (3,379,591 vs 884,207); the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 is thinner (7.2mm vs 8.3mm).
Motorola Razr Ultra 2026
Nothing Phone (3a) Lite
- Higher AnTuTu: 3379591 vs 884207
- Better Geekbench Single: 3041 vs 1011
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9494 vs 2813
- Faster charging: 68W vs 45W
- Higher refresh rate: 165Hz vs 120Hz
- Higher performance (93/100 vs 55/100)
- Better camera (60/100 vs 35/100)
- Longer battery life (64/100 vs 48/100)
- Better display (95/100 vs 79/100)
- Better portability (68/100 vs 56/100)
- Cheaper at launch: $249 vs $1499
- Overall rating 52/100
Comparing the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 vs the Nothing Phone (3a) Lite, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 scores 26 points higher (78/100 vs 52/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 leads (93/100 vs 55/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 leads (60/100 vs 35/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 leads (64/100 vs 48/100). Value score: Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 — 62/100, Nothing Phone (3a) Lite — 58/100; it is biased by price level, so it should not be compared directly between devices at different prices. In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 significantly outperforms the Nothing Phone (3a) Lite (93/100 vs 55/100). In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 notably outperforms the Nothing Phone (3a) Lite (95/100 vs 79/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 notably outperforms the Nothing Phone (3a) Lite (60/100 vs 35/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 notably outperforms the Nothing Phone (3a) Lite (64/100 vs 48/100). In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 is a bit better (68/100 vs 56/100).
| Specification | Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 | Nothing Phone (3a) Lite | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Pro | |
| AnTuTu | 3379591 | 884207 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3041 | 1011 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9494 | 2813 | |
| Display | 7.0" Foldable LTPO AMOLED | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1224x2992 | 2392x1080 | |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 68W | 45W | |
| Wireless charging | 30W | 0W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 8 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 16 MP | |
| RAM | 16GB | 8GB | |
| Storage | 512GB | 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 15 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 5000 nits | 3000 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP48 | IP54 | |
| Dimensions | 171.5×74.0×7.2 mm | 164.0×78.0×8.3 mm | |
| Weight | 199 g | 199 g | |
| Launch price | $1499 | $249 |
Motorola Razr Ultra 2026
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Nothing Phone (3a) Lite
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 16MP
Motorola Razr Ultra 2026
- 7.0" Foldable LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 1224x2992
- Refresh rate: 165 Hz
Nothing Phone (3a) Lite
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 2392x1080
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Motorola Razr Ultra 2026
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 68W
- Wireless: 30W
Nothing Phone (3a) Lite
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- No wireless charging
We compared Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 and Nothing Phone (3a) Lite, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 leads Nothing Phone (3a) Lite by 282.2% in our overall performance rating.
Launch price difference: $1250. Nothing Phone (3a) Lite was $1250 cheaper at launch.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 significantly outperforms the Nothing Phone (3a) Lite (93/100 vs 55/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 notably outperforms the Nothing Phone (3a) Lite (95/100 vs 79/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 notably outperforms the Nothing Phone (3a) Lite (60/100 vs 35/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 notably outperforms the Nothing Phone (3a) Lite (64/100 vs 48/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 is a bit better (68/100 vs 56/100).
Which is better: the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 or the Nothing Phone (3a) Lite?
The Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 significantly outperforms the Nothing Phone (3a) Lite by 26 points (78/100 vs 52/100).
What is the rating of the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 and the Nothing Phone (3a) Lite?
The Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 has a MobileRank rating of 78/100, the Nothing Phone (3a) Lite — 52/100.
Which has the better camera: the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 or the Nothing Phone (3a) Lite?
The Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 leads on camera score (60/100 vs 35/100).
Which is more powerful: the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 or the Nothing Phone (3a) Lite?
The Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 leads on performance (93/100 vs 55/100).
Should you choose the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 over the Nothing Phone (3a) Lite?
The Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 is a better fit for gamers and power users. The Nothing Phone (3a) Lite is a better fit for everyday use.