Motorola Razr 70 Ultra vs Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim

Comparing the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra (2026) and the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (2024) on specs and benchmarks. By overall MobileRank rating, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra leads — 73/100 vs 37/100 (a 36-point difference). Key differences: the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP.

The Motorola Razr 70 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim by 36 points (73/100 vs 37/100).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Motorola Razr 70 Ultra
Performance 92
Display 100
Camera 58
Battery 51
Design 51
Value for money 34
Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim
Performance 0
Display 100
Camera 81
Battery 0
Design 50
Value for money 55
What makes Motorola Razr 70 Ultra better?
  • Higher refresh rate: 165Hz vs 120Hz

  • Higher performance (92/100 vs 0/100)
  • Longer battery life (51/100 vs 0/100)
  • Better design/ergonomics (51/100 vs 50/100)
What makes Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim better?
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP

  • Better camera (81/100 vs 58/100)
  • Better value for money (55/100 vs 34/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra vs the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra scores 36 points higher (73/100 vs 37/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra leads (92/100 vs 0/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim leads (81/100 vs 58/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra leads (51/100 vs 0/100). In the "value for money" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim leads (55/100 vs 34/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (92/100 vs 0/100). In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100. In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim notably outperforms the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra (81/100 vs 58/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (51/100 vs 0/100). In the "design" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra and the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim are nearly equal (51/100 vs 50/100). In the "value for money" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim notably outperforms the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra (55/100 vs 34/100).

Motorola Razr 70 Ultra: The Motorola Razr 70 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users.
Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim: The Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim is a better fit for mobile photography enthusiasts.
Specs comparison
Specification Motorola Razr 70 Ultra Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
AnTuTu 3942923
Geekbench Single 3640
Geekbench Multi 11033
Display 7.0" pOLED 6.7" OLED
Resolution 1224x2992 1080x2400
Refresh rate 165 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 5000 mAh
Charging 68W
Wireless charging 15W 0W
Main camera 50 MP 200 MP
Ultrawide 50 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 50 MP
Front camera 50 MP 10 MP
RAM 16GB 8GB
Storage 512GB 128GB / 256GB / 512GB
OS Android 16 Android 15, One UI 7
Brightness (peak) 5000 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP48 IP68
Dimensions 171.5×74.0×7.2 mm
Weight 199 g
Price $1099
Camera comparison
Motorola Razr 70 Ultra
  • Main: 50MP f/f/1.9
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Front: 50MP
58
camera
Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim
  • Main: 200MP
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 10MP
81
camera
Display comparison
Motorola Razr 70 Ultra
  • 7.0" pOLED
  • Resolution: 1224x2992
  • Refresh rate: 165 Hz
100
display
Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim
  • 6.7" OLED
  • Resolution: 1080x2400
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
100
display
Battery and charging
Motorola Razr 70 Ultra
  • 5000 mAh
  • Wired: 68W
  • Wireless: 15W
51
battery
Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim
  • No wireless charging
0
battery
Benchmarks
Price and availability
Motorola Razr 70 Ultra
$1099
Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim
Price unknown
Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (92/100 vs 0/100).

display

In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.

camera

In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim notably outperforms the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra (81/100 vs 58/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (51/100 vs 0/100).

design

In the "design" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra and the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim are nearly equal (51/100 vs 50/100).

value for money

In the "value for money" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim notably outperforms the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra (55/100 vs 34/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra or the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim?

The Motorola Razr 70 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim by 36 points (73/100 vs 37/100).

What is the rating of the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra and the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim?

The Motorola Razr 70 Ultra has a MobileRank rating of 73/100, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim — 37/100.

Which has the better camera: the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra or the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim?

The Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim leads on camera score (81/100 vs 58/100).

Which is more powerful: the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra or the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim?

The Motorola Razr 70 Ultra leads on performance (92/100 vs 0/100).

Should you choose the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra over the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim?

The Motorola Razr 70 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users. The Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim is a better fit for mobile photography enthusiasts.