Motorola Moto G64 vs Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim
Comparing the Motorola Moto G64 (2024) and the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (2024) on specs and benchmarks. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim leads — 37/100 vs 32/100 (a 5-point difference). Key differences: the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP.
Motorola Moto G64
Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim
- Longer battery life (48/100 vs 0/100)
- Better design/ergonomics (60/100 vs 50/100)
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Better camera (81/100 vs 31/100)
Comparing the Motorola Moto G64 vs the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim scores 5 points higher (37/100 vs 32/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim leads (81/100 vs 31/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Moto G64 leads (48/100 vs 0/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100. In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim significantly outperforms the Motorola Moto G64 (81/100 vs 31/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Moto G64 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (48/100 vs 0/100). In the "design" category, the Motorola Moto G64 is a bit better (60/100 vs 50/100). In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
| Specification | Motorola Moto G64 | Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 7025 | — | |
| AnTuTu | — | — | |
| Geekbench Single | — | — | |
| Geekbench Multi | — | — | |
| Display | 6.5" IPS LCD | 6.7" OLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 | 1080x2400 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 6000 mAh | — | |
| Charging | 30W | — | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 10 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB / 12GB | 8GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 128GB / 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 14, planned upgrade to Android 15 | Android 15, One UI 7 | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 161.6×73.8×8.9 mm | — | |
| Weight | 192 g | — | |
| Price | — | — |
Motorola Moto G64
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 16MP
Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim
- Main: 200MP
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 10MP
Motorola Moto G64
- 6.5" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim
- 6.7" OLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Motorola Moto G64
- 6000 mAh
- Wired: 30W
- No wireless charging
Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim
- —
- No wireless charging
performance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim significantly outperforms the Motorola Moto G64 (81/100 vs 31/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Motorola Moto G64 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (48/100 vs 0/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Motorola Moto G64 is a bit better (60/100 vs 50/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
Which is better: the Motorola Moto G64 or the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim?
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim edges out the Motorola Moto G64 by just 5 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Motorola Moto G64 and the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim?
The Motorola Moto G64 has a MobileRank rating of 32/100, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim — 37/100.
Which has the better camera: the Motorola Moto G64 or the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim?
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim leads on camera score (81/100 vs 31/100).
Should you choose the Motorola Moto G64 over the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim?
The Motorola Moto G64 is a better fit for everyday use. The Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim is a better fit for mobile photography enthusiasts.