Motorola Moto G64 vs Samsung Galaxy A03
Comparing the Motorola Moto G64 (2024) and the Samsung Galaxy A03 (2022) on specs and benchmarks. By overall MobileRank rating, the Motorola Moto G64 leads — 32/100 vs 16/100 (a 16-point difference). Key differences: the Motorola Moto G64 has the bigger battery (6000 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 50 MP vs 48 MP; the Motorola Moto G64 has NFC for contactless payments, the Samsung Galaxy A03 doesn't.
Motorola Moto G64
Samsung Galaxy A03
- Bigger battery: 6000 vs 5000 mAh
- Better main camera: 50MP vs 48MP
- Lighter: 192g vs 196g
- Better camera (31/100 vs 23/100)
- Longer battery life (48/100 vs 36/100)
- Better display (100/100 vs 0/100)
- Better design/ergonomics (60/100 vs 55/100)
- Overall rating 16/100
Comparing the Motorola Moto G64 vs the Samsung Galaxy A03, the Motorola Moto G64 scores 16 points higher (32/100 vs 16/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Moto G64 leads (48/100 vs 36/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, the Motorola Moto G64 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A03 (100/100 vs 0/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Moto G64 is a bit better (31/100 vs 23/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Moto G64 is a bit better (48/100 vs 36/100). In the "design" category, the Motorola Moto G64 is a bit better (60/100 vs 55/100). In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
| Specification | Motorola Moto G64 | Samsung Galaxy A03 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 7025 | — | |
| AnTuTu | — | — | |
| Geekbench Single | — | — | |
| Geekbench Multi | — | — | |
| Display | 6.5" IPS LCD | 6.5" PLS TFT | |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 | 720x1600 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | — | |
| Battery | 6000 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 30W | — | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 48 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 5 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB / 12GB | 3GB / 4GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 32GB / 64GB / 128GB | |
| OS | Android 14, planned upgrade to Android 15 | Android 11 | |
| NFC | yes | no | |
| Dimensions | 161.6×73.8×8.9 mm | 164.2×75.9×9.1 mm | |
| Weight | 192 g | 196 g | |
| Price | — | — |
Motorola Moto G64
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 16MP
Samsung Galaxy A03
- Main: 48MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 5MP
Motorola Moto G64
- 6.5" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Samsung Galaxy A03
- 6.5" PLS TFT
- Resolution: 720x1600
- Refresh rate: —
Motorola Moto G64
- 6000 mAh
- Wired: 30W
- No wireless charging
Samsung Galaxy A03
- 5000 mAh
- No wireless charging
performance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
display
In the "display" category, the Motorola Moto G64 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A03 (100/100 vs 0/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Motorola Moto G64 is a bit better (31/100 vs 23/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Motorola Moto G64 is a bit better (48/100 vs 36/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Motorola Moto G64 is a bit better (60/100 vs 55/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
Which is better: the Motorola Moto G64 or the Samsung Galaxy A03?
The Motorola Moto G64 is noticeably better than the Samsung Galaxy A03 — the overall rating gap is 16 points.
What is the rating of the Motorola Moto G64 and the Samsung Galaxy A03?
The Motorola Moto G64 has a MobileRank rating of 32/100, the Samsung Galaxy A03 — 16/100.
Which has the better camera: the Motorola Moto G64 or the Samsung Galaxy A03?
The Motorola Moto G64 leads on camera score (31/100 vs 23/100).
Should you choose the Motorola Moto G64 over the Samsung Galaxy A03?
The Motorola Moto G64 is a better fit for everyday use. The Samsung Galaxy A03 is a better fit for everyday use.