Motorola Razr Fold vs Samsung Galaxy A03

Comparing the Motorola Razr Fold (2026) and the Samsung Galaxy A03 (2022) on specs and benchmarks. By overall MobileRank rating, the Motorola Razr Fold leads — 77/100 vs 16/100 (a 61-point difference). Key differences: the main camera is 50 MP vs 48 MP; the Motorola Razr Fold has NFC for contactless payments, the Samsung Galaxy A03 doesn't; the Samsung Galaxy A03 is noticeably lighter (196g vs 285g).

The Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A03 by 61 points (77/100 vs 16/100).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Motorola Razr Fold
Performance 92
Display 100
Camera 91
Battery 51
Design 0
Value for money 0
Samsung Galaxy A03
Performance 0
Display 0
Camera 23
Battery 36
Design 55
Value for money 55
What makes Motorola Razr Fold better?
  • Better main camera: 50MP vs 48MP

  • Higher performance (92/100 vs 0/100)
  • Better camera (91/100 vs 23/100)
  • Longer battery life (51/100 vs 36/100)
  • Better display (100/100 vs 0/100)
What makes Samsung Galaxy A03 better?
  • Lighter: 196g vs 285g

  • Better design/ergonomics (55/100 vs 0/100)
  • Better value for money (55/100 vs 0/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Motorola Razr Fold vs the Samsung Galaxy A03, the Motorola Razr Fold scores 61 points higher (77/100 vs 16/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Fold leads (92/100 vs 0/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold leads (91/100 vs 23/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Fold leads (51/100 vs 36/100). In the "value for money" category, the Samsung Galaxy A03 leads (55/100 vs 0/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A03 (92/100 vs 0/100). In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A03 (100/100 vs 0/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A03 (91/100 vs 23/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Fold notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A03 (51/100 vs 36/100). In the "design" category, the Samsung Galaxy A03 significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr Fold (55/100 vs 0/100). In the "value for money" category, the Samsung Galaxy A03 significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr Fold (55/100 vs 0/100).

Motorola Razr Fold: The Motorola Razr Fold is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts.
Samsung Galaxy A03: The Samsung Galaxy A03 is a better fit for everyday use.
Specs comparison
Specification Motorola Razr Fold Samsung Galaxy A03
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
AnTuTu 3942923
Geekbench Single 3640
Geekbench Multi 11033
Display 8.1" LTPO AMOLED 6.5" PLS TFT
Resolution 2480x2200 720x1600
Refresh rate 120 Hz
Battery 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
Charging 68W
Wireless charging 15W 0W
DXOMark (camera) 164
Main camera 50 MP 48 MP
Ultrawide 50 MP 0 MP
Telephoto 10 MP 0 MP
Front camera 32 MP 5 MP
RAM 12GB 3GB / 4GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB 32GB / 64GB / 128GB
OS Android 16 Android 11
Brightness (peak) 6200 nits
NFC yes no
Protection IPX9
Dimensions 160.1×144.5×4.7 mm 164.2×75.9×9.1 mm
Weight 285 g 196 g
Price $1799
Camera comparison
Motorola Razr Fold
  • Main: 50MP f/1.6
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 10MP
  • Front: 32MP
91
camera
Samsung Galaxy A03
  • Main: 48MP f/f/1.8
  • Front: 5MP
23
camera
Display comparison
Motorola Razr Fold
  • 8.1" LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 2480x2200
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
100
display
Samsung Galaxy A03
  • 6.5" PLS TFT
  • Resolution: 720x1600
  • Refresh rate: —
0
display
Battery and charging
Motorola Razr Fold
  • 5000 mAh
  • Wired: 68W
  • Wireless: 15W
51
battery
Samsung Galaxy A03
  • 5000 mAh
  • No wireless charging
36
battery
Benchmarks
Price and availability
Motorola Razr Fold
$1799
Samsung Galaxy A03
Price unknown
Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A03 (92/100 vs 0/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A03 (100/100 vs 0/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A03 (91/100 vs 23/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Fold notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A03 (51/100 vs 36/100).

design

In the "design" category, the Samsung Galaxy A03 significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr Fold (55/100 vs 0/100).

value for money

In the "value for money" category, the Samsung Galaxy A03 significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr Fold (55/100 vs 0/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Motorola Razr Fold or the Samsung Galaxy A03?

The Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A03 by 61 points (77/100 vs 16/100).

What is the rating of the Motorola Razr Fold and the Samsung Galaxy A03?

The Motorola Razr Fold has a MobileRank rating of 77/100, the Samsung Galaxy A03 — 16/100.

Which has the better camera: the Motorola Razr Fold or the Samsung Galaxy A03?

The Motorola Razr Fold leads on camera score (91/100 vs 23/100).

Which is more powerful: the Motorola Razr Fold or the Samsung Galaxy A03?

The Motorola Razr Fold leads on performance (92/100 vs 0/100).

Should you choose the Motorola Razr Fold over the Samsung Galaxy A03?

The Motorola Razr Fold is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts. The Samsung Galaxy A03 is a better fit for everyday use.