Motorola Moto G64 vs Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
The Motorola Moto G64 (2024) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 7025, while the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra leads — 80/100 vs 49/100 (a 31-point difference). Key differences: the Motorola Moto G64 has the bigger battery (6000 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (3,128,552 vs 668,462); the Motorola Moto G64 is noticeably lighter (192g vs 218g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Motorola Moto G64
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
What makes Motorola Moto G64 better?
- Bigger battery: 6000 vs 5000 mAh
- Lighter: 192g vs 218g
- Better portability (55/100 vs 46/100)
What makes Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3128552 vs 668462
- Better Geekbench Single: 3100 vs 969
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9760 vs 2321
- Faster charging: 45W vs 30W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Higher performance (92/100 vs 49/100)
- Better camera (81/100 vs 35/100)
- Longer battery life (56/100 vs 53/100)
- Better display (88/100 vs 67/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Motorola Moto G64 vs the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra scores 31 points higher (80/100 vs 49/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra leads (92/100 vs 49/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra leads (81/100 vs 35/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra significantly outperforms the Motorola Moto G64 (92/100 vs 49/100). In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra notably outperforms the Motorola Moto G64 (88/100 vs 67/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra significantly outperforms the Motorola Moto G64 (81/100 vs 35/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra and the Motorola Moto G64 are nearly equal (56/100 vs 53/100). In the "portability" category, the Motorola Moto G64 is a bit better (55/100 vs 46/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Motorola Moto G64 | Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 7025 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | |
| AnTuTu | 668462 | 3128552 | |
| Geekbench Single | 969 | 3100 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2321 | 9760 | |
| Display | 6.5" IPS LCD | 6.9" Dynamic AMOLED 2X | |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 | 3120x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 6000 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 30W | 45W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 15W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 151 | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 12 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB / 12GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 14, planned upgrade to Android 15 | Android 15 / One UI 7 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 2600 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 161.6×73.8×8.9 mm | 162.8×77.6×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | 192 g | 218 g | |
| Launch price | — | $1299 |
Camera comparison
Motorola Moto G64
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 16MP
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
- Main: 200MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 12MP
Display comparison
Motorola Moto G64
- 6.5" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
- 6.9" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 3120x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Motorola Moto G64
- 6000 mAh
- Wired: 30W
- No wireless charging
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
- 5000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 11:10 hrs, total 28:43 hrs
- Wired: 45W
- Wireless: 15W
Overall performance score
We compared Motorola Moto G64 and Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra leads Motorola Moto G64 by 78.6% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Motorola Moto G64
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra significantly outperforms the Motorola Moto G64 (92/100 vs 49/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra notably outperforms the Motorola Moto G64 (88/100 vs 67/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra significantly outperforms the Motorola Moto G64 (81/100 vs 35/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra and the Motorola Moto G64 are nearly equal (56/100 vs 53/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Motorola Moto G64 is a bit better (55/100 vs 46/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Motorola Moto G64 or the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra?
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra significantly outperforms the Motorola Moto G64 by 31 points (80/100 vs 49/100).
What is the rating of the Motorola Moto G64 and the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra?
The Motorola Moto G64 has a MobileRank rating of 49/100, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra — 80/100.
Which has the better camera: the Motorola Moto G64 or the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra?
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra leads on camera score (81/100 vs 35/100).
Which is more powerful: the Motorola Moto G64 or the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra?
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra leads on performance (92/100 vs 49/100).
Should you choose the Motorola Moto G64 over the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra?
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts.