Motorola Moto G64 vs Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
The Motorola Moto G64 (2024) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 7025, while the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads — 57/100 vs 32/100 (a 25-point difference). Key differences: the Motorola Moto G64 has the bigger battery (6000 mAh vs 5600); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Motorola Moto G64 is noticeably lighter (192g vs 309g).
Motorola Moto G64
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- Bigger battery: 6000 vs 5600 mAh
- Lighter: 192g vs 309g
- Better design/ergonomics (60/100 vs 0/100)
- Better value for money (55/100 vs 0/100)
- Faster charging: 45W vs 30W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Higher performance (67/100 vs 0/100)
- Better camera (49/100 vs 31/100)
- Longer battery life (52/100 vs 48/100)
Comparing the Motorola Moto G64 vs the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold scores 25 points higher (57/100 vs 32/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (67/100 vs 0/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (49/100 vs 31/100). In the "value for money" category, the Motorola Moto G64 leads (55/100 vs 0/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Motorola Moto G64 (67/100 vs 0/100). In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100. In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold notably outperforms the Motorola Moto G64 (49/100 vs 31/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold and the Motorola Moto G64 are nearly equal (52/100 vs 48/100). In the "design" category, the Motorola Moto G64 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (60/100 vs 0/100). In the "value for money" category, the Motorola Moto G64 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (55/100 vs 0/100).
| Specification | Motorola Moto G64 | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 7025 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | |
| AnTuTu | — | 2926532 | |
| Geekbench Single | — | 3050 | |
| Geekbench Multi | — | 9300 | |
| Display | 6.5" IPS LCD | 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X | |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 | 2160x1584 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 6000 mAh | 5600 mAh | |
| Charging | 30W | 45W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 15W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 12 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 10 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 10 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB / 12GB | 16GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 512GB | |
| OS | Android 14, planned upgrade to Android 15 | Android 16 / One UI 8 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 2600 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP48 | |
| Dimensions | 161.6×73.8×8.9 mm | 159.2×75.0×12.9 mm | |
| Weight | 192 g | 309 g | |
| Price | — | $2899 |
Motorola Moto G64
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 16MP
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 10MP
Motorola Moto G64
- 6.5" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 2160x1584
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Motorola Moto G64
- 6000 mAh
- Wired: 30W
- No wireless charging
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 5600 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- Wireless: 15W
Motorola Moto G64
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Motorola Moto G64 (67/100 vs 0/100).
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold notably outperforms the Motorola Moto G64 (49/100 vs 31/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold and the Motorola Moto G64 are nearly equal (52/100 vs 48/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Motorola Moto G64 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (60/100 vs 0/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Motorola Moto G64 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (55/100 vs 0/100).
Which is better: the Motorola Moto G64 or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Motorola Moto G64 by 25 points (57/100 vs 32/100).
What is the rating of the Motorola Moto G64 and the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Motorola Moto G64 has a MobileRank rating of 32/100, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold — 57/100.
Which has the better camera: the Motorola Moto G64 or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads on camera score (49/100 vs 31/100).
Which is more powerful: the Motorola Moto G64 or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads on performance (67/100 vs 0/100).
Should you choose the Motorola Moto G64 over the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Motorola Moto G64 is a better fit for everyday use. The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a better fit for active users.