Motorola Moto G73 vs Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim
Comparing the Motorola Moto G73 (2023) and the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (2024) on specs and benchmarks. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim leads — 37/100 vs 31/100 (a 6-point difference). Key differences: the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP.
Motorola Moto G73
Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim
- Longer battery life (39/100 vs 0/100)
- Better design/ergonomics (73/100 vs 50/100)
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Better camera (81/100 vs 31/100)
Comparing the Motorola Moto G73 vs the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim scores 6 points higher (37/100 vs 31/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim leads (81/100 vs 31/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Moto G73 leads (39/100 vs 0/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100. In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim significantly outperforms the Motorola Moto G73 (81/100 vs 31/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Moto G73 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (39/100 vs 0/100). In the "design" category, the Motorola Moto G73 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (73/100 vs 50/100). In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
| Specification | Motorola Moto G73 | Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 930 | — | |
| AnTuTu | — | — | |
| Geekbench Single | — | — | |
| Geekbench Multi | — | — | |
| Display | 6.5" IPS LCD | 6.7" OLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 | 1080x2400 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | — | |
| Charging | 30W | — | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 10 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB | 8GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 128GB / 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 13 | Android 15, One UI 7 | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 161.4×73.8×8.3 mm | — | |
| Weight | 181 g | — | |
| Price | — | — |
Motorola Moto G73
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 16MP
Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim
- Main: 200MP
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 10MP
Motorola Moto G73
- 6.5" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim
- 6.7" OLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Motorola Moto G73
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 30W
- No wireless charging
Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim
- —
- No wireless charging
performance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim significantly outperforms the Motorola Moto G73 (81/100 vs 31/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Motorola Moto G73 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (39/100 vs 0/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Motorola Moto G73 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (73/100 vs 50/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
Which is better: the Motorola Moto G73 or the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim?
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim edges out the Motorola Moto G73 by just 6 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Motorola Moto G73 and the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim?
The Motorola Moto G73 has a MobileRank rating of 31/100, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim — 37/100.
Which has the better camera: the Motorola Moto G73 or the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim?
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim leads on camera score (81/100 vs 31/100).
Should you choose the Motorola Moto G73 over the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim?
The Motorola Moto G73 is a better fit for everyday use. The Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim is a better fit for mobile photography enthusiasts.