Motorola Razr 70 Ultra vs Vivo X300s

The Motorola Razr 70 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, while the Vivo X300s (2026) runs on the Dimensity 9500; estimated prices are $1099 and $723. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300s leads — 82/100 vs 73/100 (a 9-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300s has the bigger battery (7100 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (3,942,923 vs 3,703,823); the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra is noticeably lighter (199g vs 217g).

The Vivo X300s edges out the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra by just 9 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
Profile comparison
Category scores
Motorola Razr 70 Ultra
Performance 92
Display 100
Camera 58
Battery 51
Design 51
Value for money 34
Vivo X300s
Performance 80
Display 100
Camera 94
Battery 76
Design 28
Value for money 60
What makes Motorola Razr 70 Ultra better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 3942923 vs 3703823
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3640 vs 3228
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 11033 vs 9553
  • Higher refresh rate: 165Hz vs 144Hz
  • Lighter: 199g vs 217g

  • Higher performance (92/100 vs 80/100)
  • Better design/ergonomics (51/100 vs 28/100)
What makes Vivo X300s better?
  • Bigger battery: 7100 vs 5000 mAh
  • Faster charging: 90W vs 68W
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
  • Faster wireless charging: 40W vs 15W
  • Cheaper: $723 vs $1099

  • Better camera (94/100 vs 58/100)
  • Longer battery life (76/100 vs 51/100)
  • Better value for money (60/100 vs 34/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra vs the Vivo X300s, the Vivo X300s scores 9 points higher (82/100 vs 73/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra leads (92/100 vs 80/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300s leads (94/100 vs 58/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300s leads (76/100 vs 51/100). In the "value for money" category, the Vivo X300s leads (60/100 vs 34/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra is a bit better (92/100 vs 80/100). In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100. In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300s significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra (94/100 vs 58/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300s notably outperforms the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra (76/100 vs 51/100). In the "design" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra notably outperforms the Vivo X300s (51/100 vs 28/100). In the "value for money" category, the Vivo X300s notably outperforms the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra (60/100 vs 34/100).

Motorola Razr 70 Ultra: The Motorola Razr 70 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users.
Vivo X300s: The Vivo X300s is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life.
Specs comparison
Specification Motorola Razr 70 Ultra Vivo X300s
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 Dimensity 9500
AnTuTu 3942923 3703823
Geekbench Single 3640 3228
Geekbench Multi 11033 9553
Display 7.0" pOLED 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
Resolution 1224x2992 2800x1260
Refresh rate 165 Hz 144 Hz
Battery 5000 mAh 7100 mAh
Charging 68W 90W
Wireless charging 15W 40W
Main camera 50 MP 200 MP
Ultrawide 50 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 50 MP
Front camera 50 MP 50 MP
RAM 16GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 512GB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 16 Android 16 / OriginOS 6
Brightness (peak) 5000 nits
NFC yes
Protection IP48
Dimensions 171.5×74.0×7.2 mm
Weight 199 g 217 g
Price $1099 $723
Camera comparison
Motorola Razr 70 Ultra
  • Main: 50MP f/f/1.9
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Front: 50MP
58
camera
Vivo X300s
  • Main: 200MP f/f/1.7
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 50MP
94
camera
Display comparison
Motorola Razr 70 Ultra
  • 7.0" pOLED
  • Resolution: 1224x2992
  • Refresh rate: 165 Hz
100
display
Vivo X300s
  • 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 2800x1260
  • Refresh rate: 144 Hz
100
display
Battery and charging
Motorola Razr 70 Ultra
  • 5000 mAh
  • Wired: 68W
  • Wireless: 15W
51
battery
Vivo X300s
  • 7100 mAh
  • Wired: 90W
  • Wireless: 40W
76
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Motorola Razr 70 Ultra and Vivo X300s, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Motorola Razr 70 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
73/100
3942923 AnTuTu
Vivo X300s Dimensity 9500
82/100 -6.5%
3703823 AnTuTu

Motorola Razr 70 Ultra leads Vivo X300s by 6.5% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Price and availability
Motorola Razr 70 Ultra
$1099
Vivo X300s
$723

Price difference: $376. Vivo X300s is cheaper by $376.

Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra is a bit better (92/100 vs 80/100).

display

In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.

camera

In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300s significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra (94/100 vs 58/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300s notably outperforms the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra (76/100 vs 51/100).

design

In the "design" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra notably outperforms the Vivo X300s (51/100 vs 28/100).

value for money

In the "value for money" category, the Vivo X300s notably outperforms the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra (60/100 vs 34/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra or the Vivo X300s?

The Vivo X300s edges out the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra by just 9 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.

What is the rating of the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra and the Vivo X300s?

The Motorola Razr 70 Ultra has a MobileRank rating of 73/100, the Vivo X300s — 82/100.

Which has the better camera: the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra or the Vivo X300s?

The Vivo X300s leads on camera score (94/100 vs 58/100).

Which is more powerful: the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra or the Vivo X300s?

The Motorola Razr 70 Ultra leads on performance (92/100 vs 80/100).

Should you choose the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra over the Vivo X300s?

The Motorola Razr 70 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users. The Vivo X300s is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life.