Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 vs Vivo X300s

The Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the Vivo X300s (2026) runs on the Dimensity 9500; estimated prices are $1499 and $723. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300s leads — 89/100 vs 78/100 (a 11-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300s has the bigger battery (7100 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300s is faster in AnTuTu (3,703,823 vs 3,379,591); the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 is noticeably lighter (199g vs 217g).

The Vivo X300s is noticeably better than the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 — the overall rating gap is 11 points.
Profile comparison
Category scores
Motorola Razr Ultra 2026
Performance 93
Display 95
Camera 60
Battery 64
Portability 68
Value for money 62
Vivo X300s
Performance 94
Display 94
Camera 94
Battery 83
Portability 42
Value for money 90
What makes Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 better?
  • Higher refresh rate: 165Hz vs 144Hz
  • Lighter: 199g vs 217g

  • Better display (95/100 vs 94/100)
  • Better portability (68/100 vs 42/100)
What makes Vivo X300s better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 3703823 vs 3379591
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3228 vs 3041
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 9553 vs 9494
  • Bigger battery: 7100 vs 5000 mAh
  • Faster charging: 90W vs 68W
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
  • Faster wireless charging: 40W vs 30W
  • Cheaper: $723 vs $1499

  • Higher performance (94/100 vs 93/100)
  • Better camera (94/100 vs 60/100)
  • Longer battery life (83/100 vs 64/100)
  • Better value for money (90/100 vs 62/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 vs the Vivo X300s, the Vivo X300s scores 11 points higher (89/100 vs 78/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300s leads (94/100 vs 60/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300s leads (83/100 vs 64/100). In the "value for money" category, the Vivo X300s leads (90/100 vs 62/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300s and the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 are nearly equal (94/100 vs 93/100). In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 and the Vivo X300s are nearly equal (95/100 vs 94/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300s significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 (94/100 vs 60/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300s notably outperforms the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 (83/100 vs 64/100). In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 notably outperforms the Vivo X300s (68/100 vs 42/100). In the "value for money" category, the Vivo X300s notably outperforms the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 (90/100 vs 62/100).

Motorola Razr Ultra 2026: The Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 is a better fit for gamers and power users.
Vivo X300s: The Vivo X300s is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.
Specs comparison
Specification Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 Vivo X300s
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Dimensity 9500
AnTuTu 3379591 3703823
Geekbench Single 3041 3228
Geekbench Multi 9494 9553
Display 7.0" Foldable LTPO AMOLED 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
Resolution 1224x2992 2800x1260
Refresh rate 165 Hz 144 Hz
Battery 5000 mAh 7100 mAh
Charging 68W 90W
Wireless charging 30W 40W
Main camera 50 MP 200 MP
Ultrawide 50 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 50 MP
Front camera 50 MP 50 MP
RAM 16GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 512GB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 16 Android 16 / OriginOS 6
Brightness (peak) 5000 nits
NFC yes
Protection IP48
Dimensions 171.5×74.0×7.2 mm
Weight 199 g 217 g
Price $1499 $723
Camera comparison
Motorola Razr Ultra 2026
  • Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Front: 50MP
60
camera
Vivo X300s
  • Main: 200MP f/f/1.7
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 50MP
94
camera
Display comparison
Motorola Razr Ultra 2026
  • 7.0" Foldable LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1224x2992
  • Refresh rate: 165 Hz
95
display
Vivo X300s
  • 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 2800x1260
  • Refresh rate: 144 Hz
94
display
Battery and charging
Motorola Razr Ultra 2026
  • 5000 mAh
  • Wired: 68W
  • Wireless: 30W
64
battery
Vivo X300s
  • 7100 mAh
  • Wired: 90W
  • Wireless: 40W
83
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 and Vivo X300s, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
78/100
3379591 AnTuTu
Vivo X300s Dimensity 9500
89/100 +8.8%
3703823 AnTuTu

Vivo X300s leads Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 by 8.8% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Price and availability
Motorola Razr Ultra 2026
$1499
Vivo X300s
$723

Price difference: $776. Vivo X300s is cheaper by $776.

Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300s and the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 are nearly equal (94/100 vs 93/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 and the Vivo X300s are nearly equal (95/100 vs 94/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300s significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 (94/100 vs 60/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300s notably outperforms the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 (83/100 vs 64/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 notably outperforms the Vivo X300s (68/100 vs 42/100).

value for money

In the "value for money" category, the Vivo X300s notably outperforms the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 (90/100 vs 62/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 or the Vivo X300s?

The Vivo X300s is noticeably better than the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 — the overall rating gap is 11 points.

What is the rating of the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 and the Vivo X300s?

The Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 has a MobileRank rating of 78/100, the Vivo X300s — 89/100.

Which has the better camera: the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 or the Vivo X300s?

The Vivo X300s leads on camera score (94/100 vs 60/100).

Should you choose the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 over the Vivo X300s?

The Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 is a better fit for gamers and power users. The Vivo X300s is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.