Motorola Razr 60 Ultra vs Vivo X300s
The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra (2025) runs on the Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the Vivo X300s (2026) runs on the Dimensity 9500; estimated prices are $1099 and $723. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300s leads — 89/100 vs 76/100 (a 13-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300s has the bigger battery (7100 mAh vs 4700); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300s is faster in AnTuTu (3,703,823 vs 3,113,462); the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is noticeably lighter (199g vs 217g).
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
Vivo X300s
- Higher refresh rate: 165Hz vs 144Hz
- Lighter: 199g vs 217g
- Better portability (68/100 vs 42/100)
- Higher AnTuTu: 3703823 vs 3113462
- Better Geekbench Single: 3228 vs 3041
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9553 vs 9494
- Bigger battery: 7100 vs 4700 mAh
- Faster charging: 90W vs 68W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Faster wireless charging: 40W vs 30W
- Cheaper: $723 vs $1099
- Higher performance (94/100 vs 92/100)
- Better camera (94/100 vs 57/100)
- Longer battery life (83/100 vs 58/100)
- Better value for money (90/100 vs 64/100)
Comparing the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra vs the Vivo X300s, the Vivo X300s scores 13 points higher (89/100 vs 76/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300s leads (94/100 vs 57/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300s leads (83/100 vs 58/100). In the "value for money" category, the Vivo X300s leads (90/100 vs 64/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300s and the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra are nearly equal (94/100 vs 92/100). In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 94/100. In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300s significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra (94/100 vs 57/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300s notably outperforms the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra (83/100 vs 58/100). In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra notably outperforms the Vivo X300s (68/100 vs 42/100). In the "value for money" category, the Vivo X300s notably outperforms the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra (90/100 vs 64/100).
| Specification | Motorola Razr 60 Ultra | Vivo X300s | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Snapdragon 8 Elite | Dimensity 9500 | |
| AnTuTu | 3113462 | 3703823 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3041 | 3228 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9494 | 9553 | |
| Display | 7.0" pOLED | 6.8" LTPO AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1224x2912 | 2800x1260 | |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz | 144 Hz | |
| Battery | 4700 mAh | 7100 mAh | |
| Charging | 68W | 90W | |
| Wireless charging | 30W | 40W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 50 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 16 / OriginOS 6 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 4500 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | — | |
| Protection | IP48 | — | |
| Dimensions | 171.5×74.0×7.2 mm | — | |
| Weight | 199 g | 217 g | |
| Price | $1099 | $723 |
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Vivo X300s
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
- 7.0" pOLED
- Resolution: 1224x2912
- Refresh rate: 165 Hz
Vivo X300s
- 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 2800x1260
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
- 4700 mAh
- Wired: 68W
- Wireless: 30W
Vivo X300s
- 7100 mAh
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 40W
We compared Motorola Razr 60 Ultra and Vivo X300s, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300s leads Motorola Razr 60 Ultra by 15.9% in our overall performance rating.
Price difference: $376. Vivo X300s is cheaper by $376.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300s and the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra are nearly equal (94/100 vs 92/100).
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 94/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300s significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra (94/100 vs 57/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300s notably outperforms the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra (83/100 vs 58/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra notably outperforms the Vivo X300s (68/100 vs 42/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Vivo X300s notably outperforms the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra (90/100 vs 64/100).
Which is better: the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra or the Vivo X300s?
The Vivo X300s is noticeably better than the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra — the overall rating gap is 13 points.
What is the rating of the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra and the Vivo X300s?
The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra has a MobileRank rating of 76/100, the Vivo X300s — 89/100.
Which has the better camera: the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra or the Vivo X300s?
The Vivo X300s leads on camera score (94/100 vs 57/100).
Should you choose the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra over the Vivo X300s?
The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users. The Vivo X300s is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.