Motorola Razr 40 Ultra vs Vivo X300 Pro
The Motorola Razr 40 Ultra (2023) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, while the Vivo X300 Pro (2025) runs on the Dimensity 9500. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Pro leads — 87/100 vs 54/100 (a 33-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Pro has the bigger battery (6510 mAh vs 3800); the main camera is 12 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,269,794 vs 1,425,446); the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra is noticeably lighter (184g vs 226g).
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
Vivo X300 Pro
- Higher refresh rate: 165Hz vs 120Hz
- Lighter: 184g vs 226g
- Better display (91/100 vs 84/100)
- Better portability (80/100 vs 43/100)
- Higher AnTuTu: 3269794 vs 1425446
- Better Geekbench Single: 3228 vs 1761
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9553 vs 4688
- Bigger battery: 6510 vs 3800 mAh
- Faster charging: 90W vs 30W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 12MP
- Faster wireless charging: 40W vs 5W
- Higher performance (93/100 vs 71/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 23/100)
- Longer battery life (81/100 vs 26/100)
Comparing the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra vs the Vivo X300 Pro, the Vivo X300 Pro scores 33 points higher (87/100 vs 54/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (93/100 vs 71/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (96/100 vs 23/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (81/100 vs 26/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra (93/100 vs 71/100). In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra is a bit better (91/100 vs 84/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra (96/100 vs 23/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra (81/100 vs 26/100). In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra significantly outperforms the Vivo X300 Pro (80/100 vs 43/100).
| Specification | Motorola Razr 40 Ultra | Vivo X300 Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 | Dimensity 9500 | |
| AnTuTu | 1425446 | 3269794 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1761 | 3228 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 4688 | 9553 | |
| Display | 6.9" Foldable LTPO AMOLED | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2640 | 1260x2800 | |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 3800 mAh | 6510 mAh | |
| Charging | 30W | 90W | |
| Wireless charging | 5W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 171 | |
| Main camera | 12 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 13 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB / 12GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 13, up to 3 major Android upgrades | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 1400 nits | 4500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 170.8×74.0×7.0 mm | 161.2×75.5×8.0 mm | |
| Weight | 184 g | 226 g | |
| Launch price | — | $899 |
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
- Main: 12MP f/f/1.5
- Ultrawide: 13MP
- Front: 32MP
Vivo X300 Pro
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.57
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
- 6.9" Foldable LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2640
- Refresh rate: 165 Hz
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1260x2800
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
- 3800 mAh
- Wired: 30W
- Wireless: 5W
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6510 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 13:30 hrs, total 24:37 hrs
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 40W
We compared Motorola Razr 40 Ultra and Vivo X300 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Pro leads Motorola Razr 40 Ultra by 56.4% in our overall performance rating.
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra (93/100 vs 71/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra is a bit better (91/100 vs 84/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra (96/100 vs 23/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra (81/100 vs 26/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra significantly outperforms the Vivo X300 Pro (80/100 vs 43/100).
Which is better: the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra by 33 points (87/100 vs 54/100).
What is the rating of the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra and the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Motorola Razr 40 Ultra has a MobileRank rating of 54/100, the Vivo X300 Pro — 87/100.
Which has the better camera: the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro leads on camera score (96/100 vs 23/100).
Which is more powerful: the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro leads on performance (93/100 vs 71/100).
Should you choose the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra over the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Motorola Razr 40 Ultra is a better fit for active users. The Vivo X300 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.