Motorola Razr 40 Ultra vs Vivo X300 Pro
The Motorola Razr 40 Ultra (2023) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, while the Vivo X300 Pro (2025) runs on the Dimensity 9500. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Pro leads — 88/100 vs 54/100 (a 34-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Pro has the bigger battery (6510 mAh vs 3800); the main camera is 12 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,326,259 vs 1,420,808); the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra is noticeably lighter (184g vs 226g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
Vivo X300 Pro
What makes Motorola Razr 40 Ultra better?
- Higher refresh rate: 165Hz vs 120Hz
- Lighter: 184g vs 226g
- Better display (91/100 vs 84/100)
- Better portability (80/100 vs 43/100)
What makes Vivo X300 Pro better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3326259 vs 1420808
- Better Geekbench Single: 3293 vs 1761
- Better Geekbench Multi: 10243 vs 4688
- Bigger battery: 6510 vs 3800 mAh
- Faster charging: 90W vs 30W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 12MP
- Faster wireless charging: 40W vs 5W
- Higher performance (94/100 vs 71/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 23/100)
- Longer battery life (81/100 vs 26/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra vs the Vivo X300 Pro, the Vivo X300 Pro scores 34 points higher (88/100 vs 54/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (94/100 vs 71/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (96/100 vs 23/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (81/100 vs 26/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra (94/100 vs 71/100). In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra is a bit better (91/100 vs 84/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra (96/100 vs 23/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra (81/100 vs 26/100). In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra significantly outperforms the Vivo X300 Pro (80/100 vs 43/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Motorola Razr 40 Ultra | Vivo X300 Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 | Dimensity 9500 | |
| AnTuTu | 1420808 | 3326259 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1761 | 3293 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 4688 | 10243 | |
| Display | 6.9" Foldable LTPO AMOLED | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2640 | 1260x2800 | |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 3800 mAh | 6510 mAh | |
| Charging | 30W | 90W | |
| Wireless charging | 5W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 171 | |
| Main camera | 12 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 13 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB / 12GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 13, up to 3 major Android upgrades | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 1400 nits | 4500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 170.8×74.0×7.0 mm | 161.2×75.5×8.0 mm | |
| Weight | 184 g | 226 g | |
| Launch price | — | $899 |
Camera comparison
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
- Main: 12MP f/1.5
- Ultrawide: 13MP
- Front: 32MP
Vivo X300 Pro
- Main: 200MP f/1.57
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
- 6.9" Foldable LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2640
- Refresh rate: 165 Hz
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1260x2800
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
- 3800 mAh
- Wired: 30W
- Wireless: 5W
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6510 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 13:30 hrs, total 24:37 hrs
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 40W
Overall performance score
We compared Motorola Razr 40 Ultra and Vivo X300 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Pro leads Motorola Razr 40 Ultra by 57.3% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra (94/100 vs 71/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra is a bit better (91/100 vs 84/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra (96/100 vs 23/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra (81/100 vs 26/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra significantly outperforms the Vivo X300 Pro (80/100 vs 43/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra by 34 points (88/100 vs 54/100).
What is the rating of the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra and the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Motorola Razr 40 Ultra has a MobileRank rating of 54/100, the Vivo X300 Pro — 88/100.
Which has the better camera: the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro leads on camera score (96/100 vs 23/100).
Which is more powerful: the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro leads on performance (94/100 vs 71/100).
Should you choose the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra over the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Motorola Razr 40 Ultra is a better fit for active users. The Vivo X300 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.