Motorola Razr 40 Ultra vs Vivo X Fold6

The Motorola Razr 40 Ultra (2023) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, while the Vivo X Fold6 (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9500. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X Fold6 leads — 88/100 vs 54/100 (a 34-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X Fold6 has the bigger battery (6900 mAh vs 3800); the main camera is 12 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X Fold6 is faster in AnTuTu (3,485,039 vs 1,425,446); the Vivo X Fold6 is thinner (4.3mm vs 7.0mm).

The Vivo X Fold6 significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra by 34 points (88/100 vs 54/100).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
Performance 71
Display 91
Camera 23
Battery 26
Portability 80
Value for money
Vivo X Fold6
Performance 94
Display 81
Camera 87
Battery 82
Portability 100
Value for money 80
What makes Motorola Razr 40 Ultra better?
  • Higher refresh rate: 165Hz vs 120Hz

  • Better display (91/100 vs 81/100)
What makes Vivo X Fold6 better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 3485039 vs 1425446
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3228 vs 1761
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 9553 vs 4688
  • Bigger battery: 6900 vs 3800 mAh
  • Faster charging: 80W vs 30W
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 12MP
  • Faster wireless charging: 50W vs 5W

  • Higher performance (94/100 vs 71/100)
  • Better camera (87/100 vs 23/100)
  • Longer battery life (82/100 vs 26/100)
  • Better portability (100/100 vs 80/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra vs the Vivo X Fold6, the Vivo X Fold6 scores 34 points higher (88/100 vs 54/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X Fold6 leads (94/100 vs 71/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X Fold6 leads (87/100 vs 23/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X Fold6 leads (82/100 vs 26/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X Fold6 notably outperforms the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra (94/100 vs 71/100). In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra is a bit better (91/100 vs 81/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X Fold6 significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra (87/100 vs 23/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X Fold6 significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra (82/100 vs 26/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo X Fold6 notably outperforms the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra (100/100 vs 80/100).

Motorola Razr 40 Ultra: The Motorola Razr 40 Ultra is a better fit for active users.
Vivo X Fold6: The Vivo X Fold6 is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.
Specs comparison
Specification Motorola Razr 40 Ultra Vivo X Fold6
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 MediaTek Dimensity 9500
AnTuTu 1425446 3485039
Geekbench Single 1761 3228
Geekbench Multi 4688 9553
Display 6.9" Foldable LTPO AMOLED 8.0" LTPO AMOLED
Resolution 1080x2640 2480x2200
Refresh rate 165 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 3800 mAh 6900 mAh
Charging 30W 80W
Wireless charging 5W 50W
Main camera 12 MP 200 MP
Ultrawide 13 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 50 MP
Front camera 32 MP 20 MP
RAM 8GB / 12GB 16GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB 512GB
OS Android 13, up to 3 major Android upgrades Android 15
Brightness (peak) 1400 nits 5500 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP68
Dimensions 170.8×74.0×7.0 mm 159.7×142.3×4.3 mm
Weight 184 g
Launch price $1900
Camera comparison
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
  • Main: 12MP f/f/1.5
  • Ultrawide: 13MP
  • Front: 32MP
23
camera
Vivo X Fold6
  • Main: 200MP f/f/1.75
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 20MP
87
camera
Display comparison
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
  • 6.9" Foldable LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1080x2640
  • Refresh rate: 165 Hz
91
display
Vivo X Fold6
  • 8.0" LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 2480x2200
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
81
display
Battery and charging
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
  • 3800 mAh
  • Wired: 30W
  • Wireless: 5W
26
battery
Vivo X Fold6
  • 6900 mAh
  • Wired: 80W
  • Wireless: 50W
82
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Motorola Razr 40 Ultra and Vivo X Fold6, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Motorola Razr 40 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
54/100
1425446 AnTuTu
Vivo X Fold6 MediaTek Dimensity 9500
88/100 +59.1%
3485039 AnTuTu

Vivo X Fold6 leads Motorola Razr 40 Ultra by 59.1% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
Price unknown
Vivo X Fold6
$1900
Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo X Fold6 notably outperforms the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra (94/100 vs 71/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra is a bit better (91/100 vs 81/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Vivo X Fold6 significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra (87/100 vs 23/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo X Fold6 significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra (82/100 vs 26/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Vivo X Fold6 notably outperforms the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra (100/100 vs 80/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra or the Vivo X Fold6?

The Vivo X Fold6 significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra by 34 points (88/100 vs 54/100).

What is the rating of the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra and the Vivo X Fold6?

The Motorola Razr 40 Ultra has a MobileRank rating of 54/100, the Vivo X Fold6 — 88/100.

Which has the better camera: the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra or the Vivo X Fold6?

The Vivo X Fold6 leads on camera score (87/100 vs 23/100).

Which is more powerful: the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra or the Vivo X Fold6?

The Vivo X Fold6 leads on performance (94/100 vs 71/100).

Should you choose the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra over the Vivo X Fold6?

The Motorola Razr 40 Ultra is a better fit for active users. The Vivo X Fold6 is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.