Motorola Razr 40 Ultra vs Vivo iQOO 13
The Motorola Razr 40 Ultra (2023) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, while the Vivo iQOO 13 (2024) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo iQOO 13 leads — 84/100 vs 54/100 (a 30-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo iQOO 13 has the bigger battery (6150 mAh vs 3800); the main camera is 12 MP vs 50 MP; the Vivo iQOO 13 is faster in AnTuTu (3,150,555 vs 1,420,808); the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra is noticeably lighter (184g vs 207g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
Vivo iQOO 13
What makes Motorola Razr 40 Ultra better?
- Higher refresh rate: 165Hz vs 144Hz
- Lighter: 184g vs 207g
- Better portability (80/100 vs 55/100)
What makes Vivo iQOO 13 better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3150555 vs 1420808
- Better Geekbench Single: 3013 vs 1761
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9287 vs 4688
- Bigger battery: 6150 vs 3800 mAh
- Faster charging: 120W vs 30W
- Better main camera: 50MP vs 12MP
- Higher performance (91/100 vs 71/100)
- Better camera (78/100 vs 23/100)
- Longer battery life (73/100 vs 26/100)
- Better display (99/100 vs 91/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra vs the Vivo iQOO 13, the Vivo iQOO 13 scores 30 points higher (84/100 vs 54/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 leads (91/100 vs 71/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 leads (78/100 vs 23/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 leads (73/100 vs 26/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 notably outperforms the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra (91/100 vs 71/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 is a bit better (99/100 vs 91/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra (78/100 vs 23/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra (73/100 vs 26/100). In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO 13 (80/100 vs 55/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Motorola Razr 40 Ultra | Vivo iQOO 13 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | |
| AnTuTu | 1420808 | 3150555 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1761 | 3013 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 4688 | 9287 | |
| Display | 6.9" Foldable LTPO AMOLED | 6.8" LTPO AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2640 | 1440x3168 | |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz | 144 Hz | |
| Battery | 3800 mAh | 6150 mAh | |
| Charging | 30W | 120W | |
| Wireless charging | 5W | 0W | |
| Main camera | 12 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 13 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB / 12GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 13, up to 3 major Android upgrades | Android 15, OriginOS 5 (China) | |
| Brightness (peak) | 1400 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 170.8×74.0×7.0 mm | 163.4×76.7×8.0 mm | |
| Weight | 184 g | 207 g | |
| Launch price | — | $650 |
Camera comparison
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
- Main: 12MP f/1.5
- Ultrawide: 13MP
- Front: 32MP
Vivo iQOO 13
- Main: 50MP f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
- 6.9" Foldable LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2640
- Refresh rate: 165 Hz
Vivo iQOO 13
- 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 1440x3168
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Battery and charging
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
- 3800 mAh
- Wired: 30W
- Wireless: 5W
Vivo iQOO 13
- 6150 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 14:22 hrs, total 30:28 hrs
- Wired: 120W
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Motorola Razr 40 Ultra and Vivo iQOO 13, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo iQOO 13 leads Motorola Razr 40 Ultra by 54.9% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 notably outperforms the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra (91/100 vs 71/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 is a bit better (99/100 vs 91/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra (78/100 vs 23/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra (73/100 vs 26/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO 13 (80/100 vs 55/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra or the Vivo iQOO 13?
The Vivo iQOO 13 significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra by 30 points (84/100 vs 54/100).
What is the rating of the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra and the Vivo iQOO 13?
The Motorola Razr 40 Ultra has a MobileRank rating of 54/100, the Vivo iQOO 13 — 84/100.
Which has the better camera: the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra or the Vivo iQOO 13?
The Vivo iQOO 13 leads on camera score (78/100 vs 23/100).
Which is more powerful: the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra or the Vivo iQOO 13?
The Vivo iQOO 13 leads on performance (91/100 vs 71/100).
Should you choose the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra over the Vivo iQOO 13?
The Motorola Razr 40 Ultra is a better fit for active users. The Vivo iQOO 13 is a better fit for gamers and power users, budget-conscious buyers.