Motorola Razr 40 Ultra vs Vivo iQOO 15
The Motorola Razr 40 Ultra (2023) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, while the Vivo iQOO 15 (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo iQOO 15 leads — 86/100 vs 54/100 (a 32-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo iQOO 15 has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 3800); the main camera is 12 MP vs 50 MP; the Vivo iQOO 15 is faster in AnTuTu (3,740,528 vs 1,425,446); the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra is noticeably lighter (184g vs 215g).
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
Vivo iQOO 15
- Higher refresh rate: 165Hz vs 144Hz
- Lighter: 184g vs 215g
- Better portability (80/100 vs 48/100)
- Higher AnTuTu: 3740528 vs 1425446
- Better Geekbench Single: 3041 vs 1761
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9494 vs 4688
- Bigger battery: 7000 vs 3800 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 30W
- Better main camera: 50MP vs 12MP
- Faster wireless charging: 40W vs 5W
- Higher performance (94/100 vs 71/100)
- Better camera (78/100 vs 23/100)
- Longer battery life (85/100 vs 26/100)
- Better display (99/100 vs 91/100)
Comparing the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra vs the Vivo iQOO 15, the Vivo iQOO 15 scores 32 points higher (86/100 vs 54/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 leads (94/100 vs 71/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 leads (78/100 vs 23/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 leads (85/100 vs 26/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 notably outperforms the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra (94/100 vs 71/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 is a bit better (99/100 vs 91/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra (78/100 vs 23/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra (85/100 vs 26/100). In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra significantly outperforms the Vivo iQOO 15 (80/100 vs 48/100).
| Specification | Motorola Razr 40 Ultra | Vivo iQOO 15 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | |
| AnTuTu | 1425446 | 3740528 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1761 | 3041 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 4688 | 9494 | |
| Display | 6.9" Foldable LTPO AMOLED | 6.8" LTPO AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2640 | 1440x3168 | |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz | 144 Hz | |
| Battery | 3800 mAh | 7000 mAh | |
| Charging | 30W | 100W | |
| Wireless charging | 5W | 40W | |
| Main camera | 12 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 13 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB / 12GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 13, up to 3 major Android upgrades | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 1400 nits | 6000 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 170.8×74.0×7.0 mm | 163.7×76.8×8.1 mm | |
| Weight | 184 g | 215 g | |
| Launch price | — | $599 |
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
- Main: 12MP f/f/1.5
- Ultrawide: 13MP
- Front: 32MP
Vivo iQOO 15
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
- 6.9" Foldable LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2640
- Refresh rate: 165 Hz
Vivo iQOO 15
- 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 1440x3168
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
- 3800 mAh
- Wired: 30W
- Wireless: 5W
Vivo iQOO 15
- 7000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 18:52 hrs, total 39:26 hrs
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 40W
We compared Motorola Razr 40 Ultra and Vivo iQOO 15, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo iQOO 15 leads Motorola Razr 40 Ultra by 61.9% in our overall performance rating.
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 notably outperforms the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra (94/100 vs 71/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 is a bit better (99/100 vs 91/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra (78/100 vs 23/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra (85/100 vs 26/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra significantly outperforms the Vivo iQOO 15 (80/100 vs 48/100).
Which is better: the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra or the Vivo iQOO 15?
The Vivo iQOO 15 significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra by 32 points (86/100 vs 54/100).
What is the rating of the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra and the Vivo iQOO 15?
The Motorola Razr 40 Ultra has a MobileRank rating of 54/100, the Vivo iQOO 15 — 86/100.
Which has the better camera: the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra or the Vivo iQOO 15?
The Vivo iQOO 15 leads on camera score (78/100 vs 23/100).
Which is more powerful: the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra or the Vivo iQOO 15?
The Vivo iQOO 15 leads on performance (94/100 vs 71/100).
Should you choose the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra over the Vivo iQOO 15?
The Motorola Razr 40 Ultra is a better fit for active users. The Vivo iQOO 15 is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.