Motorola Razr 40 Ultra vs Vivo X500 Pro
The Motorola Razr 40 Ultra (2023) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, while the Vivo X500 Pro (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9600 Pro. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X500 Pro leads — 90/100 vs 54/100 (a 36-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X500 Pro has the bigger battery (6510 mAh vs 3800); the main camera is 12 MP vs 50 MP; the Vivo X500 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (5,016,623 vs 1,420,808); the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra is thinner (7.0mm vs 8.1mm).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
Vivo X500 Pro
What makes Motorola Razr 40 Ultra better?
- Higher refresh rate: 165Hz vs 144Hz
- Lighter: 184g vs 192g
- Better portability (80/100 vs 63/100)
What makes Vivo X500 Pro better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 5016623 vs 1420808
- Better Geekbench Single: 4188 vs 1761
- Better Geekbench Multi: 13145 vs 4688
- Bigger battery: 6510 vs 3800 mAh
- Faster charging: 90W vs 30W
- Better main camera: 50MP vs 12MP
- Faster wireless charging: 40W vs 5W
- Higher performance (100/100 vs 71/100)
- Better camera (87/100 vs 23/100)
- Longer battery life (81/100 vs 26/100)
- Better display (94/100 vs 91/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra vs the Vivo X500 Pro, the Vivo X500 Pro scores 36 points higher (90/100 vs 54/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X500 Pro leads (100/100 vs 71/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X500 Pro leads (87/100 vs 23/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X500 Pro leads (81/100 vs 26/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X500 Pro notably outperforms the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra (100/100 vs 71/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X500 Pro and the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra are nearly equal (94/100 vs 91/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X500 Pro significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra (87/100 vs 23/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X500 Pro significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra (81/100 vs 26/100). In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra notably outperforms the Vivo X500 Pro (80/100 vs 63/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Motorola Razr 40 Ultra | Vivo X500 Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 | MediaTek Dimensity 9600 Pro | |
| AnTuTu | 1420808 | 5016623 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1761 | 4188 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 4688 | 13145 | |
| Display | 6.9" Foldable LTPO AMOLED | 6.4" LTPO AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2640 | 1216x2660 | |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz | 144 Hz | |
| Battery | 3800 mAh | 6510 mAh | |
| Charging | 30W | 90W | |
| Wireless charging | 5W | 40W | |
| Main camera | 12 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 13 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 64 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 50 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB / 12GB | 12GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 13, up to 3 major Android upgrades | Android 17 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 1400 nits | 4500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP68/IP69 | |
| Dimensions | 170.8×74.0×7.0 mm | 151.8×71.9×8.1 mm | |
| Weight | 184 g | 192 g | |
| Launch price | — | $970 |
Camera comparison
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
- Main: 12MP f/1.5
- Ultrawide: 13MP
- Front: 32MP
Vivo X500 Pro
- Main: 50MP f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 64MP
- Front: 50MP
Display comparison
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
- 6.9" Foldable LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2640
- Refresh rate: 165 Hz
Vivo X500 Pro
- 6.4" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 1216x2660
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Battery and charging
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
- 3800 mAh
- Wired: 30W
- Wireless: 5W
Vivo X500 Pro
- 6510 mAh
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 40W
Overall performance score
We compared Motorola Razr 40 Ultra and Vivo X500 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X500 Pro leads Motorola Razr 40 Ultra by 71.7% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X500 Pro notably outperforms the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra (100/100 vs 71/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X500 Pro and the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra are nearly equal (94/100 vs 91/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X500 Pro significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra (87/100 vs 23/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X500 Pro significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra (81/100 vs 26/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra notably outperforms the Vivo X500 Pro (80/100 vs 63/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra or the Vivo X500 Pro?
The Vivo X500 Pro significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra by 36 points (90/100 vs 54/100).
What is the rating of the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra and the Vivo X500 Pro?
The Motorola Razr 40 Ultra has a MobileRank rating of 54/100, the Vivo X500 Pro — 90/100.
Which has the better camera: the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra or the Vivo X500 Pro?
The Vivo X500 Pro leads on camera score (87/100 vs 23/100).
Which is more powerful: the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra or the Vivo X500 Pro?
The Vivo X500 Pro leads on performance (100/100 vs 71/100).
Should you choose the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra over the Vivo X500 Pro?
The Motorola Razr 40 Ultra is a better fit for active users. The Vivo X500 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.