Motorola Razr 40 Ultra vs Nothing Phone (2a) Plus

The Motorola Razr 40 Ultra (2023) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, while the Nothing Phone (2a) Plus (2024) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 7350 Pro. By overall MobileRank rating, the Nothing Phone (2a) Plus leads — 59/100 vs 54/100 (a 5-point difference). Key differences: the Nothing Phone (2a) Plus has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 3800); the main camera is 12 MP vs 50 MP; the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (1,425,446 vs 1,037,391); the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra is thinner (7.0mm vs 8.5mm).

The Nothing Phone (2a) Plus edges out the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra by just 5 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
Profile comparison
Category scores
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
Performance 71
Display 91
Camera 23
Battery 26
Portability 80
Value for money
Nothing Phone (2a) Plus
Performance 57
Display 80
Camera 60
Battery 49
Portability 59
Value for money
What makes Motorola Razr 40 Ultra better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 1425446 vs 1037391
  • Better Geekbench Single: 1761 vs 1111
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 4688 vs 2560
  • Higher refresh rate: 165Hz vs 120Hz
  • Lighter: 184g vs 190g

  • Higher performance (71/100 vs 57/100)
  • Better display (91/100 vs 80/100)
  • Better portability (80/100 vs 59/100)
What makes Nothing Phone (2a) Plus better?
  • Bigger battery: 5000 vs 3800 mAh
  • Faster charging: 50W vs 30W
  • Better main camera: 50MP vs 12MP

  • Better camera (60/100 vs 23/100)
  • Longer battery life (49/100 vs 26/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra vs the Nothing Phone (2a) Plus, the Nothing Phone (2a) Plus scores 5 points higher (59/100 vs 54/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra leads (71/100 vs 57/100). In the "camera" category, the Nothing Phone (2a) Plus leads (60/100 vs 23/100). In the "battery" category, the Nothing Phone (2a) Plus leads (49/100 vs 26/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra is a bit better (71/100 vs 57/100). In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra is a bit better (91/100 vs 80/100). In the "camera" category, the Nothing Phone (2a) Plus significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra (60/100 vs 23/100). In the "battery" category, the Nothing Phone (2a) Plus notably outperforms the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra (49/100 vs 26/100). In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra notably outperforms the Nothing Phone (2a) Plus (80/100 vs 59/100).

Motorola Razr 40 Ultra: The Motorola Razr 40 Ultra is a better fit for active users.
Nothing Phone (2a) Plus: The Nothing Phone (2a) Plus is a better fit for everyday use.
Specs comparison
Specification Motorola Razr 40 Ultra Nothing Phone (2a) Plus
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 MediaTek Dimensity 7350 Pro
AnTuTu 1425446 1037391
Geekbench Single 1761 1111
Geekbench Multi 4688 2560
Display 6.9" Foldable LTPO AMOLED 6.7" AMOLED
Resolution 1080x2640 1080x2412
Refresh rate 165 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 3800 mAh 5000 mAh
Charging 30W 50W
Wireless charging 5W 0W
Main camera 12 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 13 MP 50 MP
Front camera 32 MP 50 MP
RAM 8GB / 12GB 8GB / 12GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB 256GB
OS Android 13, up to 3 major Android upgrades Android 14, up to 3 major Android upgrades, Nothing OS 2.6
Brightness (peak) 1400 nits 1300 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP54
Dimensions 170.8×74.0×7.0 mm 161.7×76.3×8.5 mm
Weight 184 g 190 g
Launch price
Camera comparison
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
  • Main: 12MP f/f/1.5
  • Ultrawide: 13MP
  • Front: 32MP
23
camera
Nothing Phone (2a) Plus
  • Main: 50MP f/f/1.9
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Front: 50MP
60
camera
Display comparison
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
  • 6.9" Foldable LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1080x2640
  • Refresh rate: 165 Hz
91
display
Nothing Phone (2a) Plus
  • 6.7" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1080x2412
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
80
display
Battery and charging
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
  • 3800 mAh
  • Wired: 30W
  • Wireless: 5W
26
battery
Nothing Phone (2a) Plus
  • 5000 mAh
  • Wired: 50W
  • No wireless charging
49
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Motorola Razr 40 Ultra and Nothing Phone (2a) Plus, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Motorola Razr 40 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
54/100
1425446 AnTuTu
Nothing Phone (2a) Plus MediaTek Dimensity 7350 Pro
59/100 -37.4%
1037391 AnTuTu

Motorola Razr 40 Ultra leads Nothing Phone (2a) Plus by 37.4% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra is a bit better (71/100 vs 57/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra is a bit better (91/100 vs 80/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Nothing Phone (2a) Plus significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra (60/100 vs 23/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Nothing Phone (2a) Plus notably outperforms the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra (49/100 vs 26/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra notably outperforms the Nothing Phone (2a) Plus (80/100 vs 59/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra or the Nothing Phone (2a) Plus?

The Nothing Phone (2a) Plus edges out the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra by just 5 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.

What is the rating of the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra and the Nothing Phone (2a) Plus?

The Motorola Razr 40 Ultra has a MobileRank rating of 54/100, the Nothing Phone (2a) Plus — 59/100.

Which has the better camera: the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra or the Nothing Phone (2a) Plus?

The Nothing Phone (2a) Plus leads on camera score (60/100 vs 23/100).

Which is more powerful: the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra or the Nothing Phone (2a) Plus?

The Motorola Razr 40 Ultra leads on performance (71/100 vs 57/100).

Should you choose the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra over the Nothing Phone (2a) Plus?

The Motorola Razr 40 Ultra is a better fit for active users. The Nothing Phone (2a) Plus is a better fit for everyday use.