Motorola Razr 40 Ultra vs Nothing Phone (3)
The Motorola Razr 40 Ultra (2023) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, while the Nothing Phone (3) (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4. By overall MobileRank rating, the Nothing Phone (3) leads — 77/100 vs 54/100 (a 23-point difference). Key differences: the Nothing Phone (3) has the bigger battery (5150 mAh vs 3800); the main camera is 12 MP vs 50 MP; the Nothing Phone (3) is faster in AnTuTu (2,371,693 vs 1,420,808); the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra is thinner (7.0mm vs 9.0mm).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
Nothing Phone (3)
What makes Motorola Razr 40 Ultra better?
- Higher refresh rate: 165Hz vs 120Hz
- Lighter: 184g vs 198g
- Better display (91/100 vs 85/100)
- Better portability (80/100 vs 49/100)
What makes Nothing Phone (3) better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 2371693 vs 1420808
- Better Geekbench Single: 2162 vs 1761
- Better Geekbench Multi: 6847 vs 4688
- Bigger battery: 5150 vs 3800 mAh
- Faster charging: 65W vs 30W
- Better main camera: 50MP vs 12MP
- Faster wireless charging: 15W vs 5W
- Higher performance (82/100 vs 71/100)
- Better camera (81/100 vs 23/100)
- Longer battery life (63/100 vs 26/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra vs the Nothing Phone (3), the Nothing Phone (3) scores 23 points higher (77/100 vs 54/100). In the "performance" category, the Nothing Phone (3) leads (82/100 vs 71/100). In the "camera" category, the Nothing Phone (3) leads (81/100 vs 23/100). In the "battery" category, the Nothing Phone (3) leads (63/100 vs 26/100). In the "performance" category, the Nothing Phone (3) is a bit better (82/100 vs 71/100). In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra is a bit better (91/100 vs 85/100). In the "camera" category, the Nothing Phone (3) significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra (81/100 vs 23/100). In the "battery" category, the Nothing Phone (3) significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra (63/100 vs 26/100). In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nothing Phone (3) (80/100 vs 49/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Motorola Razr 40 Ultra | Nothing Phone (3) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 | |
| AnTuTu | 1420808 | 2371693 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1761 | 2162 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 4688 | 6847 | |
| Display | 6.9" Foldable LTPO AMOLED | 6.7" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2640 | 2800x1260 | |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 3800 mAh | 5150 mAh | |
| Charging | 30W | 65W | |
| Wireless charging | 5W | 15W | |
| Main camera | 12 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 13 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 50 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB / 12GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 13, up to 3 major Android upgrades | Android 15 / Nothing OS 3.0 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 1400 nits | 4500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 170.8×74.0×7.0 mm | 160.6×75.6×9.0 mm | |
| Weight | 184 g | 198 g | |
| Launch price | — | $799 |
Camera comparison
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
- Main: 12MP f/1.5
- Ultrawide: 13MP
- Front: 32MP
Nothing Phone (3)
- Main: 50MP f/1.88
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Display comparison
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
- 6.9" Foldable LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2640
- Refresh rate: 165 Hz
Nothing Phone (3)
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 2800x1260
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
- 3800 mAh
- Wired: 30W
- Wireless: 5W
Nothing Phone (3)
- 5150 mAh
- Wired: 65W
- Wireless: 15W
Overall performance score
We compared Motorola Razr 40 Ultra and Nothing Phone (3), covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Nothing Phone (3) leads Motorola Razr 40 Ultra by 40.1% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Nothing Phone (3) is a bit better (82/100 vs 71/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra is a bit better (91/100 vs 85/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Nothing Phone (3) significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra (81/100 vs 23/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Nothing Phone (3) significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra (63/100 vs 26/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nothing Phone (3) (80/100 vs 49/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra or the Nothing Phone (3)?
The Nothing Phone (3) significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra by 23 points (77/100 vs 54/100).
What is the rating of the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra and the Nothing Phone (3)?
The Motorola Razr 40 Ultra has a MobileRank rating of 54/100, the Nothing Phone (3) — 77/100.
Which has the better camera: the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra or the Nothing Phone (3)?
The Nothing Phone (3) leads on camera score (81/100 vs 23/100).
Which is more powerful: the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra or the Nothing Phone (3)?
The Nothing Phone (3) leads on performance (82/100 vs 71/100).
Should you choose the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra over the Nothing Phone (3)?
The Motorola Razr 40 Ultra is a better fit for active users. The Nothing Phone (3) is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts.