Motorola Razr 40 Ultra vs Nothing Phone (3)
The Motorola Razr 40 Ultra (2023) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, while the Nothing Phone (3) (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4. By overall MobileRank rating, the Nothing Phone (3) leads — 76/100 vs 54/100 (a 22-point difference). Key differences: the Nothing Phone (3) has the bigger battery (5150 mAh vs 3800); the main camera is 12 MP vs 50 MP; the Nothing Phone (3) is faster in AnTuTu (2,306,162 vs 1,425,446); the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra is thinner (7.0mm vs 9.0mm).
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
Nothing Phone (3)
- Higher refresh rate: 165Hz vs 120Hz
- Lighter: 184g vs 198g
- Better display (91/100 vs 85/100)
- Better portability (80/100 vs 49/100)
- Higher AnTuTu: 2306162 vs 1425446
- Better Geekbench Single: 2162 vs 1761
- Better Geekbench Multi: 6847 vs 4688
- Bigger battery: 5150 vs 3800 mAh
- Faster charging: 65W vs 30W
- Better main camera: 50MP vs 12MP
- Faster wireless charging: 15W vs 5W
- Higher performance (81/100 vs 71/100)
- Better camera (81/100 vs 23/100)
- Longer battery life (63/100 vs 26/100)
Comparing the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra vs the Nothing Phone (3), the Nothing Phone (3) scores 22 points higher (76/100 vs 54/100). In the "performance" category, the Nothing Phone (3) leads (81/100 vs 71/100). In the "camera" category, the Nothing Phone (3) leads (81/100 vs 23/100). In the "battery" category, the Nothing Phone (3) leads (63/100 vs 26/100). In the "performance" category, the Nothing Phone (3) is a bit better (81/100 vs 71/100). In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra is a bit better (91/100 vs 85/100). In the "camera" category, the Nothing Phone (3) significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra (81/100 vs 23/100). In the "battery" category, the Nothing Phone (3) significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra (63/100 vs 26/100). In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nothing Phone (3) (80/100 vs 49/100).
| Specification | Motorola Razr 40 Ultra | Nothing Phone (3) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 | |
| AnTuTu | 1425446 | 2306162 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1761 | 2162 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 4688 | 6847 | |
| Display | 6.9" Foldable LTPO AMOLED | 6.7" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2640 | 2800x1260 | |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 3800 mAh | 5150 mAh | |
| Charging | 30W | 65W | |
| Wireless charging | 5W | 15W | |
| Main camera | 12 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 13 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 50 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB / 12GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 13, up to 3 major Android upgrades | Android 15 / Nothing OS 3.0 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 1400 nits | 4500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 170.8×74.0×7.0 mm | 160.6×75.6×9.0 mm | |
| Weight | 184 g | 198 g | |
| Launch price | — | $799 |
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
- Main: 12MP f/f/1.5
- Ultrawide: 13MP
- Front: 32MP
Nothing Phone (3)
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.88
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
- 6.9" Foldable LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2640
- Refresh rate: 165 Hz
Nothing Phone (3)
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 2800x1260
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
- 3800 mAh
- Wired: 30W
- Wireless: 5W
Nothing Phone (3)
- 5150 mAh
- Wired: 65W
- Wireless: 15W
We compared Motorola Razr 40 Ultra and Nothing Phone (3), covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Nothing Phone (3) leads Motorola Razr 40 Ultra by 38.2% in our overall performance rating.
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, the Nothing Phone (3) is a bit better (81/100 vs 71/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra is a bit better (91/100 vs 85/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Nothing Phone (3) significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra (81/100 vs 23/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Nothing Phone (3) significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra (63/100 vs 26/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nothing Phone (3) (80/100 vs 49/100).
Which is better: the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra or the Nothing Phone (3)?
The Nothing Phone (3) significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra by 22 points (76/100 vs 54/100).
What is the rating of the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra and the Nothing Phone (3)?
The Motorola Razr 40 Ultra has a MobileRank rating of 54/100, the Nothing Phone (3) — 76/100.
Which has the better camera: the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra or the Nothing Phone (3)?
The Nothing Phone (3) leads on camera score (81/100 vs 23/100).
Which is more powerful: the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra or the Nothing Phone (3)?
The Nothing Phone (3) leads on performance (81/100 vs 71/100).
Should you choose the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra over the Nothing Phone (3)?
The Motorola Razr 40 Ultra is a better fit for active users. The Nothing Phone (3) is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts.