Motorola Razr 40 Ultra vs Nothing Phone (3a)
The Motorola Razr 40 Ultra (2023) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, while the Nothing Phone (3a) (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3. By overall MobileRank rating, the Nothing Phone (3a) leads — 60/100 vs 54/100 (a 6-point difference). Key differences: the Nothing Phone (3a) has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 3800); the main camera is 12 MP vs 50 MP; the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (1,425,446 vs 1,044,507); the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra is noticeably lighter (184g vs 201g).
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
Nothing Phone (3a)
- Higher AnTuTu: 1425446 vs 1044507
- Better Geekbench Single: 1761 vs 1162
- Better Geekbench Multi: 4688 vs 3315
- Higher refresh rate: 165Hz vs 120Hz
- Lighter: 184g vs 201g
- Higher performance (71/100 vs 60/100)
- Better display (91/100 vs 79/100)
- Better portability (80/100 vs 54/100)
- Bigger battery: 5000 vs 3800 mAh
- Faster charging: 45W vs 30W
- Better main camera: 50MP vs 12MP
- Better camera (61/100 vs 23/100)
- Longer battery life (48/100 vs 26/100)
Comparing the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra vs the Nothing Phone (3a), the Nothing Phone (3a) scores 6 points higher (60/100 vs 54/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra leads (71/100 vs 60/100). In the "camera" category, the Nothing Phone (3a) leads (61/100 vs 23/100). In the "battery" category, the Nothing Phone (3a) leads (48/100 vs 26/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra is a bit better (71/100 vs 60/100). In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra is a bit better (91/100 vs 79/100). In the "camera" category, the Nothing Phone (3a) significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra (61/100 vs 23/100). In the "battery" category, the Nothing Phone (3a) notably outperforms the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra (48/100 vs 26/100). In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra notably outperforms the Nothing Phone (3a) (80/100 vs 54/100).
| Specification | Motorola Razr 40 Ultra | Nothing Phone (3a) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3 | |
| AnTuTu | 1425446 | 1044507 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1761 | 1162 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 4688 | 3315 | |
| Display | 6.9" Foldable LTPO AMOLED | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2640 | 2392x1080 | |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 3800 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 30W | 45W | |
| Wireless charging | 5W | 0W | |
| Main camera | 12 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 13 MP | 8 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB / 12GB | 8GB / 12GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | Android 13, up to 3 major Android upgrades | Android 15 / Nothing OS 3.1 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 1400 nits | 3000 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP54 | |
| Dimensions | 170.8×74.0×7.0 mm | 163.5×77.5×8.4 mm | |
| Weight | 184 g | 201 g | |
| Launch price | — | $329 |
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
- Main: 12MP f/f/1.5
- Ultrawide: 13MP
- Front: 32MP
Nothing Phone (3a)
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
- 6.9" Foldable LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2640
- Refresh rate: 165 Hz
Nothing Phone (3a)
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 2392x1080
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
- 3800 mAh
- Wired: 30W
- Wireless: 5W
Nothing Phone (3a)
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- No wireless charging
We compared Motorola Razr 40 Ultra and Nothing Phone (3a), covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra leads Nothing Phone (3a) by 36.5% in our overall performance rating.
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra is a bit better (71/100 vs 60/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra is a bit better (91/100 vs 79/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Nothing Phone (3a) significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra (61/100 vs 23/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Nothing Phone (3a) notably outperforms the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra (48/100 vs 26/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra notably outperforms the Nothing Phone (3a) (80/100 vs 54/100).
Which is better: the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra or the Nothing Phone (3a)?
The Nothing Phone (3a) edges out the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra by just 6 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra and the Nothing Phone (3a)?
The Motorola Razr 40 Ultra has a MobileRank rating of 54/100, the Nothing Phone (3a) — 60/100.
Which has the better camera: the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra or the Nothing Phone (3a)?
The Nothing Phone (3a) leads on camera score (61/100 vs 23/100).
Which is more powerful: the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra or the Nothing Phone (3a)?
The Motorola Razr 40 Ultra leads on performance (71/100 vs 60/100).
Should you choose the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra over the Nothing Phone (3a)?
The Motorola Razr 40 Ultra is a better fit for active users. The Nothing Phone (3a) is a better fit for active users.