Motorola Razr 40 Ultra vs Nothing Phone (4b)
The Motorola Razr 40 Ultra (2023) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, while the Nothing Phone (4b) (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 4. By overall MobileRank rating, the Nothing Phone (4b) leads — 55/100 vs 54/100 (a 1-point difference). Key differences: the Nothing Phone (4b) has the bigger battery (5200 mAh vs 3800); the main camera is 12 MP vs 50 MP; the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (1,420,808 vs 975,254); the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra is noticeably lighter (184g vs 210g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
Nothing Phone (4b)
What makes Motorola Razr 40 Ultra better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 1420808 vs 975254
- Better Geekbench Single: 1761 vs 1087
- Better Geekbench Multi: 4688 vs 3148
- Higher refresh rate: 165Hz vs 120Hz
- Lighter: 184g vs 210g
- Higher performance (71/100 vs 58/100)
- Better display (91/100 vs 79/100)
- Better portability (80/100 vs 47/100)
What makes Nothing Phone (4b) better?
- Bigger battery: 5200 vs 3800 mAh
- Faster charging: 33W vs 30W
- Better main camera: 50MP vs 12MP
- Better camera (35/100 vs 23/100)
- Longer battery life (59/100 vs 26/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra vs the Nothing Phone (4b), the Nothing Phone (4b) scores 1 points higher (55/100 vs 54/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra leads (71/100 vs 58/100). In the "camera" category, the Nothing Phone (4b) leads (35/100 vs 23/100). In the "battery" category, the Nothing Phone (4b) leads (59/100 vs 26/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra is a bit better (71/100 vs 58/100). In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra is a bit better (91/100 vs 79/100). In the "camera" category, the Nothing Phone (4b) is a bit better (35/100 vs 23/100). In the "battery" category, the Nothing Phone (4b) significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra (59/100 vs 26/100). In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nothing Phone (4b) (80/100 vs 47/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Motorola Razr 40 Ultra | Nothing Phone (4b) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 4 | |
| AnTuTu | 1420808 | 975254 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1761 | 1087 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 4688 | 3148 | |
| Display | 6.9" Foldable LTPO AMOLED | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2640 | 1080x2344 | |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 3800 mAh | 5200 mAh | |
| Charging | 30W | 33W | |
| Wireless charging | 5W | — | |
| Main camera | 12 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 13 MP | 8 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 16 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB / 12GB | 8GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | Android 13, up to 3 major Android upgrades | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 1400 nits | 2000 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP64 | |
| Dimensions | 170.8×74.0×7.0 mm | 164.4×78.2×8.6 mm | |
| Weight | 184 g | 210 g | |
| Launch price | — | $355 |
Camera comparison
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
- Main: 12MP f/1.5
- Ultrawide: 13MP
- Front: 32MP
Nothing Phone (4b)
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 16MP
Display comparison
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
- 6.9" Foldable LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2640
- Refresh rate: 165 Hz
Nothing Phone (4b)
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2344
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
- 3800 mAh
- Wired: 30W
- Wireless: 5W
Nothing Phone (4b)
- 5200 mAh
- Wired: 33W
- Wireless charging: no data
Overall performance score
We compared Motorola Razr 40 Ultra and Nothing Phone (4b), covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra leads Nothing Phone (4b) by 45.7% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra is a bit better (71/100 vs 58/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra is a bit better (91/100 vs 79/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Nothing Phone (4b) is a bit better (35/100 vs 23/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Nothing Phone (4b) significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra (59/100 vs 26/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nothing Phone (4b) (80/100 vs 47/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra or the Nothing Phone (4b)?
The Nothing Phone (4b) edges out the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra by just 1 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra and the Nothing Phone (4b)?
The Motorola Razr 40 Ultra has a MobileRank rating of 54/100, the Nothing Phone (4b) — 55/100.
Which has the better camera: the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra or the Nothing Phone (4b)?
The Nothing Phone (4b) leads on camera score (35/100 vs 23/100).
Which is more powerful: the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra or the Nothing Phone (4b)?
The Motorola Razr 40 Ultra leads on performance (71/100 vs 58/100).
Should you choose the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra over the Nothing Phone (4b)?
The Motorola Razr 40 Ultra is a better fit for active users.