Motorola Razr 40 Ultra vs Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra
The Motorola Razr 40 Ultra (2023) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, while the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; estimated prices are $648 and $799. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads — 84/100 vs 32/100 (a 52-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra has the bigger battery (7400 mAh vs 3800); the main camera is 12 MP vs 50 MP; the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,602,290 vs 1,425,446); the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra is noticeably lighter (184g vs 227g).
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra
- Higher refresh rate: 165Hz vs 144Hz
- Lighter: 184g vs 227g
- Cheaper: $648 vs $799
- Better design/ergonomics (70/100 vs 16/100)
- Better value for money (65/100 vs 55/100)
- Higher AnTuTu: 4602290 vs 1425446
- Better Geekbench Single: 3640 vs 1761
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11033 vs 4688
- Bigger battery: 7400 vs 3800 mAh
- Faster charging: 120W vs 30W
- Better main camera: 50MP vs 12MP
- Faster wireless charging: 50W vs 5W
- Higher performance (97/100 vs 22/100)
- Better camera (74/100 vs 14/100)
- Longer battery life (86/100 vs 10/100)
Comparing the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra vs the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra scores 52 points higher (84/100 vs 32/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads (97/100 vs 22/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads (74/100 vs 14/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads (86/100 vs 10/100). In the "value for money" category, the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra leads (65/100 vs 55/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra (97/100 vs 22/100). In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100. In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra (74/100 vs 14/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra (86/100 vs 10/100). In the "design" category, the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra significantly outperforms the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra (70/100 vs 16/100). In the "value for money" category, the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra is a bit better (65/100 vs 55/100).
| Specification | Motorola Razr 40 Ultra | Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 1425446 | 4602290 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1761 | 3640 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 4688 | 11033 | |
| Display | 6.9" Foldable LTPO AMOLED | 6.8" LTPO AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2640 | 1440x3168 | |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz | 144 Hz | |
| Battery | 3800 mAh | 7400 mAh | |
| Charging | 30W | 120W | |
| Wireless charging | 5W | 50W | |
| Main camera | 12 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 13 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB / 12GB | 12GB / 16GB / 24GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 13, up to 3 major Android upgrades | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 1400 nits | 8000 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 170.8×74.0×7.0 mm | 163.7×76.8×8.7 mm | |
| Weight | 184 g | 227 g | |
| Price | $648 | $799 |
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
- Main: 12MP f/f/1.5
- Ultrawide: 13MP
- Front: 32MP
Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
- 6.9" Foldable LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2640
- Refresh rate: 165 Hz
Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 1440x3168
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
- 3800 mAh
- Wired: 30W
- Wireless: 5W
Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra
- 7400 mAh
- Wired: 120W
- Wireless: 50W
We compared Motorola Razr 40 Ultra and Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads Motorola Razr 40 Ultra by 69.0% in our overall performance rating.
Price difference: $151. Motorola Razr 40 Ultra is cheaper by $151.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra (97/100 vs 22/100).
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra (74/100 vs 14/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra (86/100 vs 10/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra significantly outperforms the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra (70/100 vs 16/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra is a bit better (65/100 vs 55/100).
Which is better: the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra or the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra?
The Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra by 52 points (84/100 vs 32/100).
What is the rating of the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra and the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra?
The Motorola Razr 40 Ultra has a MobileRank rating of 32/100, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra — 84/100.
Which has the better camera: the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra or the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra?
The Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads on camera score (74/100 vs 14/100).
Which is more powerful: the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra or the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra?
The Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads on performance (97/100 vs 22/100).
Should you choose the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra over the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra?
The Motorola Razr 40 Ultra is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life.