Motorola Razr Ultra 2025 vs Vivo iQOO 15

The Motorola Razr Ultra 2025 (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the Vivo iQOO 15 (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; estimated prices are $1299 and $599. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo iQOO 15 leads — 86/100 vs 77/100 (a 9-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo iQOO 15 has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 4700); the Vivo iQOO 15 is faster in AnTuTu (3,740,528 vs 3,119,308); the Motorola Razr Ultra 2025 is noticeably lighter (199g vs 215g).

The Vivo iQOO 15 edges out the Motorola Razr Ultra 2025 by just 9 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
Profile comparison
Category scores
Motorola Razr Ultra 2025
Performance 92
Display 94
Camera 60
Battery 58
Portability 68
Value for money 62
Vivo iQOO 15
Performance 94
Display 99
Camera 78
Battery 85
Portability 48
Value for money 84
What makes Motorola Razr Ultra 2025 better?
  • Higher refresh rate: 165Hz vs 144Hz
  • Lighter: 199g vs 215g

  • Better portability (68/100 vs 48/100)
What makes Vivo iQOO 15 better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 3740528 vs 3119308
  • Bigger battery: 7000 vs 4700 mAh
  • Faster charging: 100W vs 68W
  • Faster wireless charging: 40W vs 30W
  • Cheaper: $599 vs $1299

  • Higher performance (94/100 vs 92/100)
  • Better camera (78/100 vs 60/100)
  • Longer battery life (85/100 vs 58/100)
  • Better display (99/100 vs 94/100)
  • Better value for money (84/100 vs 62/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Motorola Razr Ultra 2025 vs the Vivo iQOO 15, the Vivo iQOO 15 scores 9 points higher (86/100 vs 77/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 leads (78/100 vs 60/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 leads (85/100 vs 58/100). In the "value for money" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 leads (84/100 vs 62/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 and the Motorola Razr Ultra 2025 are nearly equal (94/100 vs 92/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 is a bit better (99/100 vs 94/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 notably outperforms the Motorola Razr Ultra 2025 (78/100 vs 60/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 notably outperforms the Motorola Razr Ultra 2025 (85/100 vs 58/100). In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2025 notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO 15 (68/100 vs 48/100). In the "value for money" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 notably outperforms the Motorola Razr Ultra 2025 (84/100 vs 62/100).

Motorola Razr Ultra 2025: The Motorola Razr Ultra 2025 is a better fit for gamers and power users.
Vivo iQOO 15: The Vivo iQOO 15 is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.
Specs comparison
Specification Motorola Razr Ultra 2025 Vivo iQOO 15
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
AnTuTu 3119308 3740528
Geekbench Single 3041 3041
Geekbench Multi 9494 9494
Display 7.0" Foldable LTPO AMOLED 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
Resolution 1224x2912 1440x3168
Refresh rate 165 Hz 144 Hz
Battery 4700 mAh 7000 mAh
Charging 68W 100W
Wireless charging 30W 40W
Main camera 50 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 50 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 50 MP
Front camera 50 MP 32 MP
RAM 16GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 512GB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 15 Android 16
Brightness (peak) 4500 nits 6000 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP48 IP68
Dimensions 171.5×74.0×7.2 mm 163.7×76.8×8.1 mm
Weight 199 g 215 g
Price $1299 $599
Camera comparison
Motorola Razr Ultra 2025
  • Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Front: 50MP
60
camera
Vivo iQOO 15
  • Main: 50MP f/f/1.9
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 32MP
78
camera
Display comparison
Motorola Razr Ultra 2025
  • 7.0" Foldable LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1224x2912
  • Refresh rate: 165 Hz
94
display
Vivo iQOO 15
  • 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1440x3168
  • Refresh rate: 144 Hz
99
display
Battery and charging
Motorola Razr Ultra 2025
  • 4700 mAh
  • Wired: 68W
  • Wireless: 30W
58
battery
Vivo iQOO 15
  • 7000 mAh
  • NanoReview test: web browsing 18:52 hrs, total 39:26 hrs
  • Wired: 100W
  • Wireless: 40W
85
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Motorola Razr Ultra 2025 and Vivo iQOO 15, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Motorola Razr Ultra 2025 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
77/100
3119308 AnTuTu
Vivo iQOO 15 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
86/100 +16.6%
3740528 AnTuTu

Vivo iQOO 15 leads Motorola Razr Ultra 2025 by 16.6% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Price and availability
Motorola Razr Ultra 2025
$1299
Vivo iQOO 15
$599

Price difference: $700. Vivo iQOO 15 is cheaper by $700.

Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 and the Motorola Razr Ultra 2025 are nearly equal (94/100 vs 92/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 is a bit better (99/100 vs 94/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 notably outperforms the Motorola Razr Ultra 2025 (78/100 vs 60/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 notably outperforms the Motorola Razr Ultra 2025 (85/100 vs 58/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2025 notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO 15 (68/100 vs 48/100).

value for money

In the "value for money" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 notably outperforms the Motorola Razr Ultra 2025 (84/100 vs 62/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Motorola Razr Ultra 2025 or the Vivo iQOO 15?

The Vivo iQOO 15 edges out the Motorola Razr Ultra 2025 by just 9 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.

What is the rating of the Motorola Razr Ultra 2025 and the Vivo iQOO 15?

The Motorola Razr Ultra 2025 has a MobileRank rating of 77/100, the Vivo iQOO 15 — 86/100.

Which has the better camera: the Motorola Razr Ultra 2025 or the Vivo iQOO 15?

The Vivo iQOO 15 leads on camera score (78/100 vs 60/100).

Should you choose the Motorola Razr Ultra 2025 over the Vivo iQOO 15?

The Motorola Razr Ultra 2025 is a better fit for gamers and power users. The Vivo iQOO 15 is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.