Vivo X300 Ultra vs Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold
The Vivo X300 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, while the Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold (2021) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 888. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads — 91/100 vs 58/100 (a 33-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Ultra has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 5020); the main camera is 200 MP vs 108 MP; the Vivo X300 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,247,433 vs 1,135,878); the Vivo X300 Ultra is noticeably lighter (230g vs 317g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Vivo X300 Ultra
Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold
What makes Vivo X300 Ultra better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 4247433 vs 1135878
- Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 1500
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 3537
- Bigger battery: 7000 vs 5020 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 67W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 108MP
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 90Hz
- Lighter: 230g vs 317g
- Higher performance (99/100 vs 64/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 51/100)
- Longer battery life (85/100 vs 53/100)
- Better display (89/100 vs 67/100)
What makes Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold better?
- Better portability (40/100 vs 39/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Vivo X300 Ultra vs the Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold, the Vivo X300 Ultra scores 33 points higher (91/100 vs 58/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (99/100 vs 64/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 51/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (85/100 vs 53/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold (99/100 vs 64/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold (89/100 vs 67/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold (96/100 vs 51/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold (85/100 vs 53/100). In the "portability" category, the Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold and the Vivo X300 Ultra are nearly equal (40/100 vs 39/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Vivo X300 Ultra | Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 | |
| AnTuTu | 4247433 | 1135878 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3639 | 1500 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 11047 | 3537 | |
| Display | 6.8" LTPO OLED | 8.0" Foldable AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 3168x1440 | 1860x2480 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 90 Hz | |
| Battery | 7000 mAh | 5020 mAh | |
| Charging | 100W | 67W | |
| Wireless charging | 40W | 0W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | 170 | — | |
| Main camera | 200 MP | 108 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 13 MP | |
| Telephoto | 200 MP | 8 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 20 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 10, MIUI 12 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 900 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP69 | — | |
| Dimensions | 163.0×76.8×8.2 mm | — | |
| Weight | 230 g | 317 g | |
| Launch price | $950 | — |
Camera comparison
Vivo X300 Ultra
- Main: 200MP f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 32MP
Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold
- Main: 108MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 13MP
- Telephoto: 8MP
- Front: 20MP
Display comparison
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPO OLED
- Resolution: 3168x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold
- 8.0" Foldable AMOLED
- Resolution: 1860x2480
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
Battery and charging
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 7000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 10:18 hrs, total 29:11 hrs
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 40W
Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold
- 5020 mAh
- Wired: 67W
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Vivo X300 Ultra and Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Ultra leads Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold by 273.9% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold (99/100 vs 64/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold (89/100 vs 67/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold (96/100 vs 51/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold (85/100 vs 53/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold and the Vivo X300 Ultra are nearly equal (40/100 vs 39/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Vivo X300 Ultra or the Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold?
The Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold by 33 points (91/100 vs 58/100).
What is the rating of the Vivo X300 Ultra and the Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold?
The Vivo X300 Ultra has a MobileRank rating of 91/100, the Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold — 58/100.
Which has the better camera: the Vivo X300 Ultra or the Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on camera score (96/100 vs 51/100).
Which is more powerful: the Vivo X300 Ultra or the Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on performance (99/100 vs 64/100).
Should you choose the Vivo X300 Ultra over the Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold?
The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers. The Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold is a better fit for active users.