Vivo X300 Ultra vs Xiaomi Mix Flip 2
The Vivo X300 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, while the Xiaomi Mix Flip 2 (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; launch prices were $950 and $830. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads — 91/100 vs 74/100 (a 17-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Ultra has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 5165); the main camera is 200 MP vs 50 MP; the Vivo X300 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,247,433 vs 3,126,402); the Xiaomi Mix Flip 2 is noticeably lighter (199g vs 230g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Vivo X300 Ultra
Xiaomi Mix Flip 2
What makes Vivo X300 Ultra better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 4247433 vs 3126402
- Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 3013
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 9287
- Bigger battery: 7000 vs 5165 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 67W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Higher performance (99/100 vs 91/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 57/100)
- Longer battery life (85/100 vs 56/100)
- Better display (89/100 vs 85/100)
What makes Xiaomi Mix Flip 2 better?
- Lighter: 199g vs 230g
- Cheaper at launch: $830 vs $950
- Better portability (64/100 vs 39/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Vivo X300 Ultra vs the Xiaomi Mix Flip 2, the Vivo X300 Ultra scores 17 points higher (91/100 vs 74/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 57/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (85/100 vs 56/100). Value score: Vivo X300 Ultra — 94/100, Xiaomi Mix Flip 2 — 62/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (99/100 vs 91/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra and the Xiaomi Mix Flip 2 are nearly equal (89/100 vs 85/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Xiaomi Mix Flip 2 (96/100 vs 57/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Xiaomi Mix Flip 2 (85/100 vs 56/100). In the "portability" category, the Xiaomi Mix Flip 2 notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (64/100 vs 39/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Vivo X300 Ultra | Xiaomi Mix Flip 2 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | |
| AnTuTu | 4247433 | 3126402 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3639 | 3013 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 11047 | 9287 | |
| Display | 6.8" LTPO OLED | 6.9" Foldable LTPO AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 3168x1440 | 1224x2912 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 7000 mAh | 5165 mAh | |
| Charging | 100W | 67W | |
| Wireless charging | 40W | 0W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | 170 | — | |
| Main camera | 200 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 200 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 15 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 3200 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP69 | — | |
| Dimensions | 163.0×76.8×8.2 mm | 166.9×73.8×7.6 mm | |
| Weight | 230 g | 199 g | |
| Launch price | $950 | $830 |
Camera comparison
Vivo X300 Ultra
- Main: 200MP f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 32MP
Xiaomi Mix Flip 2
- Main: 50MP
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPO OLED
- Resolution: 3168x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Xiaomi Mix Flip 2
- 6.9" Foldable LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 1224x2912
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 7000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 10:18 hrs, total 29:11 hrs
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 40W
Xiaomi Mix Flip 2
- 5165 mAh
- Wired: 67W
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Vivo X300 Ultra and Xiaomi Mix Flip 2, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Ultra leads Xiaomi Mix Flip 2 by 35.9% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $120. Xiaomi Mix Flip 2 was $120 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (99/100 vs 91/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra and the Xiaomi Mix Flip 2 are nearly equal (89/100 vs 85/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Xiaomi Mix Flip 2 (96/100 vs 57/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Xiaomi Mix Flip 2 (85/100 vs 56/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Xiaomi Mix Flip 2 notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (64/100 vs 39/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Vivo X300 Ultra or the Xiaomi Mix Flip 2?
The Vivo X300 Ultra is noticeably better than the Xiaomi Mix Flip 2 — the overall rating gap is 17 points.
What is the rating of the Vivo X300 Ultra and the Xiaomi Mix Flip 2?
The Vivo X300 Ultra has a MobileRank rating of 91/100, the Xiaomi Mix Flip 2 — 74/100.
Which has the better camera: the Vivo X300 Ultra or the Xiaomi Mix Flip 2?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on camera score (96/100 vs 57/100).
Which is more powerful: the Vivo X300 Ultra or the Xiaomi Mix Flip 2?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on performance (99/100 vs 91/100).
Should you choose the Vivo X300 Ultra over the Xiaomi Mix Flip 2?
The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers. The Xiaomi Mix Flip 2 is a better fit for gamers and power users.