Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra vs Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold

The Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9500M, while the Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold (2021) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 888. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra leads — 75/100 vs 58/100 (a 17-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra has the bigger battery (9100 mAh vs 5020); the main camera is 50 MP vs 108 MP; the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (3,579,952 vs 1,135,878); the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra is noticeably lighter (225g vs 317g).

The Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra is noticeably better than the Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold — the overall rating gap is 17 points.

Profile comparison

Category scores

Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra

Performance 95
Display 99
Camera 35
Battery 80
Portability 38
Value for money 68

Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold

Performance 64
Display 67
Camera 51
Battery 53
Portability 40
Value for money —

What makes Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 3579952 vs 1135878
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3293 vs 1500
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 10243 vs 3537
  • Bigger battery: 9100 vs 5020 mAh
  • Faster charging: 100W vs 67W
  • Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 90Hz
  • Lighter: 225g vs 317g

  • Higher performance (95/100 vs 64/100)
  • Longer battery life (80/100 vs 53/100)
  • Better display (99/100 vs 67/100)

What makes Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold better?

  • Better main camera: 108MP vs 50MP

  • Better camera (51/100 vs 35/100)
  • Better portability (40/100 vs 38/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra vs the Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra scores 17 points higher (75/100 vs 58/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra leads (95/100 vs 64/100). In the "camera" category, the Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold leads (51/100 vs 35/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra leads (80/100 vs 53/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra significantly outperforms the Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold (95/100 vs 64/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra significantly outperforms the Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold (99/100 vs 67/100). In the "camera" category, the Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra (51/100 vs 35/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra notably outperforms the Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold (80/100 vs 53/100). In the "portability" category, the Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold and the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra are nearly equal (40/100 vs 38/100).

Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra: The Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life.
Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold: The Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold is a better fit for active users.

Specs comparison

Specification Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold
Processor MediaTek Dimensity 9500M Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
AnTuTu 3579952 1135878
Geekbench Single 3293 1500
Geekbench Multi 10243 3537
Display 6.8" LTPS AMOLED 8.0" Foldable AMOLED
Resolution 1440x3200 1860x2480
Refresh rate 144 Hz 90 Hz
Battery 9100 mAh 5020 mAh
Charging 100W 67W
Main camera 50 MP 108 MP
Ultrawide 8 MP 13 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 8 MP
Front camera 16 MP 20 MP
RAM 12GB / 16GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB 256GB / 512GB
OS Android 16 / OriginOS 6 Android 10, MIUI 12
Brightness (peak) 4500 nits 900 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP68/IP69 —
Dimensions 163.4×75.9×8.6 mm —
Weight 225 g 317 g
Launch price $548 —

Camera comparison

Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra

  • Main: 50MP f/1.88
  • Ultrawide: 8MP
  • Front: 16MP
35
camera

Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold

  • Main: 108MP f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 13MP
  • Telephoto: 8MP
  • Front: 20MP
51
camera

Display comparison

Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra

  • 6.8" LTPS AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1440x3200
  • Refresh rate: 144 Hz
99
display

Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold

  • 8.0" Foldable AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1860x2480
  • Refresh rate: 90 Hz
67
display

Battery and charging

Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra

  • 9100 mAh
  • Wired: 100W
  • No wireless charging
80
battery

Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold

  • 5020 mAh
  • Wired: 67W
  • No wireless charging
53
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra and Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra MediaTek Dimensity 9500M
75/100
3579952 AnTuTu
Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
58/100 -215.2%
1135878 AnTuTu

Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra leads Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold by 215.2% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra

$548

Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold

Price unknown

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra significantly outperforms the Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold (95/100 vs 64/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra significantly outperforms the Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold (99/100 vs 67/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra (51/100 vs 35/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra notably outperforms the Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold (80/100 vs 53/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold and the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra are nearly equal (40/100 vs 38/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra or the Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold?

The Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra is noticeably better than the Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold — the overall rating gap is 17 points.

What is the rating of the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra and the Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold?

The Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra has a MobileRank rating of 75/100, the Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold — 58/100.

Which has the better camera: the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra or the Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold?

The Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold leads on camera score (51/100 vs 35/100).

Which is more powerful: the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra or the Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold?

The Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra leads on performance (95/100 vs 64/100).

Should you choose the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra over the Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold?

The Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life. The Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold is a better fit for active users.