Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra vs Xiaomi 17T Pro
The Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9500M, while the Xiaomi 17T Pro (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9500; launch prices were $548 and $899. By overall MobileRank rating, the Xiaomi 17T Pro leads — 82/100 vs 75/100 (a 7-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra has the bigger battery (9100 mAh vs 7000); the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (3,579,952 vs 3,182,664); the Xiaomi 17T Pro is noticeably lighter (205g vs 225g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra
Xiaomi 17T Pro
What makes Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3579952 vs 3182664
- Bigger battery: 9100 vs 7000 mAh
- Cheaper at launch: $548 vs $899
- Higher performance (95/100 vs 93/100)
- Better display (99/100 vs 94/100)
What makes Xiaomi 17T Pro better?
- Lighter: 205g vs 225g
- Better camera (63/100 vs 35/100)
- Longer battery life (87/100 vs 80/100)
- Better portability (54/100 vs 38/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra vs the Xiaomi 17T Pro, the Xiaomi 17T Pro scores 7 points higher (82/100 vs 75/100). In the "camera" category, the Xiaomi 17T Pro leads (63/100 vs 35/100). Value score: Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra — 68/100, Xiaomi 17T Pro — 76/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra and the Xiaomi 17T Pro are nearly equal (95/100 vs 93/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra is a bit better (99/100 vs 94/100). In the "camera" category, the Xiaomi 17T Pro notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra (63/100 vs 35/100). In the "battery" category, the Xiaomi 17T Pro is a bit better (87/100 vs 80/100). In the "portability" category, the Xiaomi 17T Pro notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra (54/100 vs 38/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra | Xiaomi 17T Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 9500M | MediaTek Dimensity 9500 | |
| AnTuTu | 3579952 | 3182664 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3293 | 3293 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 10243 | 10243 | |
| Display | 6.8" LTPS AMOLED | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1440x3200 | 2772x1280 | |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 144 Hz | |
| Battery | 9100 mAh | 7000 mAh | |
| Charging | 100W | 100W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 50W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 12 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 12GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 16 / OriginOS 6 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 4500 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68/IP69 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 163.4×75.9×8.6 mm | — | |
| Weight | 225 g | 205 g | |
| Launch price | $548 | $899 |
Camera comparison
Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra
- Main: 50MP f/1.88
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 16MP
Xiaomi 17T Pro
- Main: 50MP f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPS AMOLED
- Resolution: 1440x3200
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Xiaomi 17T Pro
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 2772x1280
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Battery and charging
Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra
- 9100 mAh
- Wired: 100W
- No wireless charging
Xiaomi 17T Pro
- 7000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 18:30 hrs, total 36:42 hrs
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 50W
Overall performance score
We compared Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra and Xiaomi 17T Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra leads Xiaomi 17T Pro by 12.5% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $351. Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra was $351 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra and the Xiaomi 17T Pro are nearly equal (95/100 vs 93/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra is a bit better (99/100 vs 94/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Xiaomi 17T Pro notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra (63/100 vs 35/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Xiaomi 17T Pro is a bit better (87/100 vs 80/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Xiaomi 17T Pro notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra (54/100 vs 38/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra or the Xiaomi 17T Pro?
The Xiaomi 17T Pro edges out the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra by just 7 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra and the Xiaomi 17T Pro?
The Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra has a MobileRank rating of 75/100, the Xiaomi 17T Pro — 82/100.
Which has the better camera: the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra or the Xiaomi 17T Pro?
The Xiaomi 17T Pro leads on camera score (63/100 vs 35/100).
Should you choose the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra over the Xiaomi 17T Pro?
The Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life. The Xiaomi 17T Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.