Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra vs Xiaomi 18 Fold

The Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9500M, while the Xiaomi 18 Fold (2026) runs on the Xiaomi XRING O3; launch prices were $548 and $1639. By overall MobileRank rating, the Xiaomi 18 Fold leads — 86/100 vs 75/100 (a 11-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra has the bigger battery (9100 mAh vs 6000); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Xiaomi 18 Fold is faster in AnTuTu (5,228,014 vs 3,579,952); the Xiaomi 18 Fold is thinner (5.0mm vs 8.6mm).

The Xiaomi 18 Fold is noticeably better than the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra — the overall rating gap is 11 points.

Profile comparison

Category scores

Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra

Performance 95
Display 99
Camera 35
Battery 80
Portability 38
Value for money 68

Xiaomi 18 Fold

Performance 99
Display 79
Camera 85
Battery 75
Portability 64
Value for money 80

What makes Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra better?

  • Bigger battery: 9100 vs 6000 mAh
  • Faster charging: 100W vs 67W
  • Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
  • Cheaper at launch: $548 vs $1639

  • Longer battery life (80/100 vs 75/100)
  • Better display (99/100 vs 79/100)

What makes Xiaomi 18 Fold better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 5228014 vs 3579952
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3715 vs 3352
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 14213 vs 10402
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
  • Lighter: 219g vs 225g

  • Higher performance (99/100 vs 95/100)
  • Better camera (85/100 vs 35/100)
  • Better portability (64/100 vs 38/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra vs the Xiaomi 18 Fold, the Xiaomi 18 Fold scores 11 points higher (86/100 vs 75/100). In the "camera" category, the Xiaomi 18 Fold leads (85/100 vs 35/100). Value score: Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra — 68/100, Xiaomi 18 Fold — 80/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Xiaomi 18 Fold and the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra are nearly equal (99/100 vs 95/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra notably outperforms the Xiaomi 18 Fold (99/100 vs 79/100). In the "camera" category, the Xiaomi 18 Fold significantly outperforms the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra (85/100 vs 35/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra is a bit better (80/100 vs 75/100). In the "portability" category, the Xiaomi 18 Fold notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra (64/100 vs 38/100).

Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra: The Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life.
Xiaomi 18 Fold: The Xiaomi 18 Fold is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.

Specs comparison

Specification Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra Xiaomi 18 Fold
Processor MediaTek Dimensity 9500M Xiaomi XRING O3
AnTuTu 3579952 5228014
Geekbench Single 3352 3715
Geekbench Multi 10402 14213
Display 6.8" LTPS AMOLED 7.6" LTPO AMOLED
Resolution 1440x3200 1672x2364
Refresh rate 144 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 9100 mAh 6000 mAh
Charging 100W 67W
Wireless charging 0W 50W
Main camera 50 MP 200 MP
Ultrawide 8 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 50 MP
Front camera 16 MP 16 MP
RAM 12GB / 16GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 16 / OriginOS 6 Android 16
Brightness (peak) 4500 nits 4000 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP68/IP69 IP59
Dimensions 163.4×75.9×8.6 mm 159.7×145.1×5.0 mm
Weight 225 g 219 g
Launch price $548 $1639

Camera comparison

Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra

  • Main: 50MP f/1.88
  • Ultrawide: 8MP
  • Front: 16MP
35
camera

Xiaomi 18 Fold

  • Main: 200MP f/1.7
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 16MP
85
camera

Display comparison

Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra

  • 6.8" LTPS AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1440x3200
  • Refresh rate: 144 Hz
99
display

Xiaomi 18 Fold

  • 7.6" LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1672x2364
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
79
display

Battery and charging

Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra

  • 9100 mAh
  • Wired: 100W
  • No wireless charging
80
battery

Xiaomi 18 Fold

  • 6000 mAh
  • Wired: 67W
  • Wireless: 50W
75
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra and Xiaomi 18 Fold, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra MediaTek Dimensity 9500M
75/100
3579952 AnTuTu
Xiaomi 18 Fold Xiaomi XRING O3
86/100 +31.5%
5228014 AnTuTu

Xiaomi 18 Fold leads Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra by 31.5% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra

$548

Xiaomi 18 Fold

$1639

Launch price difference: $1091. Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra was $1091 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Xiaomi 18 Fold and the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra are nearly equal (99/100 vs 95/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra notably outperforms the Xiaomi 18 Fold (99/100 vs 79/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Xiaomi 18 Fold significantly outperforms the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra (85/100 vs 35/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra is a bit better (80/100 vs 75/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Xiaomi 18 Fold notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra (64/100 vs 38/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra or the Xiaomi 18 Fold?

The Xiaomi 18 Fold is noticeably better than the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra — the overall rating gap is 11 points.

What is the rating of the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra and the Xiaomi 18 Fold?

The Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra has a MobileRank rating of 75/100, the Xiaomi 18 Fold — 86/100.

Which has the better camera: the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra or the Xiaomi 18 Fold?

The Xiaomi 18 Fold leads on camera score (85/100 vs 35/100).

Should you choose the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra over the Xiaomi 18 Fold?

The Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life. The Xiaomi 18 Fold is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.