Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra vs Xiaomi 18 Pro

The Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9500M, while the Xiaomi 18 Pro (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 6; launch prices were $548 and $845. By overall MobileRank rating, the Xiaomi 18 Pro leads — 92/100 vs 75/100 (a 17-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra has the bigger battery (9100 mAh vs 7000); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Xiaomi 18 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (4,888,150 vs 3,579,952); the Xiaomi 18 Pro is noticeably lighter (203g vs 225g).

The Xiaomi 18 Pro is noticeably better than the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra — the overall rating gap is 17 points.

Profile comparison

Category scores

Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra

Performance 95
Display 99
Camera 35
Battery 80
Portability 38
Value for money 68

Xiaomi 18 Pro

Performance 100
Display 82
Camera 100
Battery 87
Portability 52
Value for money 98

What makes Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra better?

  • Bigger battery: 9100 vs 7000 mAh
  • Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
  • Cheaper at launch: $548 vs $845

  • Better display (99/100 vs 82/100)

What makes Xiaomi 18 Pro better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 4888150 vs 3579952
  • Better Geekbench Single: 4301 vs 3352
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 12490 vs 10402
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
  • Lighter: 203g vs 225g

  • Higher performance (100/100 vs 95/100)
  • Better camera (100/100 vs 35/100)
  • Longer battery life (87/100 vs 80/100)
  • Better portability (52/100 vs 38/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra vs the Xiaomi 18 Pro, the Xiaomi 18 Pro scores 17 points higher (92/100 vs 75/100). In the "camera" category, the Xiaomi 18 Pro leads (100/100 vs 35/100). Value score: Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra — 68/100, Xiaomi 18 Pro — 98/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Xiaomi 18 Pro is a bit better (100/100 vs 95/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra notably outperforms the Xiaomi 18 Pro (99/100 vs 82/100). In the "camera" category, the Xiaomi 18 Pro significantly outperforms the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra (100/100 vs 35/100). In the "battery" category, the Xiaomi 18 Pro is a bit better (87/100 vs 80/100). In the "portability" category, the Xiaomi 18 Pro is a bit better (52/100 vs 38/100).

Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra: The Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life.
Xiaomi 18 Pro: The Xiaomi 18 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.

Specs comparison

Specification Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra Xiaomi 18 Pro
Processor MediaTek Dimensity 9500M Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 6
AnTuTu 3579952 4888150
Geekbench Single 3352 4301
Geekbench Multi 10402 12490
Display 6.8" LTPS AMOLED 6.4" LTPO AMOLED
Resolution 1440x3200 1120x2436
Refresh rate 144 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 9100 mAh 7000 mAh
Charging 100W 100W
Wireless charging 0W 50W
Main camera 50 MP 200 MP
Ultrawide 8 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 200 MP
Front camera 16 MP 50 MP
RAM 12GB / 16GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 16 / OriginOS 6 Android 17
Brightness (peak) 4500 nits 4000 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP68/IP69 IP68/IP69
Dimensions 163.4×75.9×8.6 mm 151.8×72.0×8.5 mm
Weight 225 g 203 g
Launch price $548 $845

Camera comparison

Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra

  • Main: 50MP f/1.88
  • Ultrawide: 8MP
  • Front: 16MP
35
camera

Xiaomi 18 Pro

  • Main: 200MP f/1.7
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 200MP
  • Front: 50MP
100
camera

Display comparison

Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra

  • 6.8" LTPS AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1440x3200
  • Refresh rate: 144 Hz
99
display

Xiaomi 18 Pro

  • 6.4" LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1120x2436
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
82
display

Battery and charging

Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra

  • 9100 mAh
  • Wired: 100W
  • No wireless charging
80
battery

Xiaomi 18 Pro

  • 7000 mAh
  • Wired: 100W
  • Wireless: 50W
87
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra and Xiaomi 18 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra MediaTek Dimensity 9500M
75/100
3579952 AnTuTu
Xiaomi 18 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 6
92/100 +26.8%
4888150 AnTuTu

Xiaomi 18 Pro leads Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra by 26.8% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra

$548

Xiaomi 18 Pro

$845

Launch price difference: $297. Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra was $297 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Xiaomi 18 Pro is a bit better (100/100 vs 95/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra notably outperforms the Xiaomi 18 Pro (99/100 vs 82/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Xiaomi 18 Pro significantly outperforms the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra (100/100 vs 35/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Xiaomi 18 Pro is a bit better (87/100 vs 80/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Xiaomi 18 Pro is a bit better (52/100 vs 38/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra or the Xiaomi 18 Pro?

The Xiaomi 18 Pro is noticeably better than the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra — the overall rating gap is 17 points.

What is the rating of the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra and the Xiaomi 18 Pro?

The Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra has a MobileRank rating of 75/100, the Xiaomi 18 Pro — 92/100.

Which has the better camera: the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra or the Xiaomi 18 Pro?

The Xiaomi 18 Pro leads on camera score (100/100 vs 35/100).

Which is more powerful: the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra or the Xiaomi 18 Pro?

The Xiaomi 18 Pro leads on performance (100/100 vs 95/100).

Should you choose the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra over the Xiaomi 18 Pro?

The Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life. The Xiaomi 18 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.