Tecno Pova Slim vs Vivo X300 Pro
The Tecno Pova Slim (2025) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 6400, while the Vivo X300 Pro (2025) runs on the Dimensity 9500; launch prices were $230 and $899. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Pro leads — 88/100 vs 52/100 (a 36-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Pro has the bigger battery (6510 mAh vs 5160); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,326,259 vs 581,041); the Tecno Pova Slim is noticeably lighter (156g vs 226g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Tecno Pova Slim
Vivo X300 Pro
What makes Tecno Pova Slim better?
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Lighter: 156g vs 226g
- Cheaper at launch: $230 vs $899
- Better display (93/100 vs 84/100)
- Better portability (100/100 vs 43/100)
What makes Vivo X300 Pro better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3326259 vs 581041
- Better Geekbench Single: 3293 vs 803
- Better Geekbench Multi: 10243 vs 2047
- Bigger battery: 6510 vs 5160 mAh
- Faster charging: 90W vs 45W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Higher performance (94/100 vs 45/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 31/100)
- Longer battery life (81/100 vs 51/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Tecno Pova Slim vs the Vivo X300 Pro, the Vivo X300 Pro scores 36 points higher (88/100 vs 52/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (94/100 vs 45/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (96/100 vs 31/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (81/100 vs 51/100). Value score: Tecno Pova Slim — 58/100, Vivo X300 Pro — 88/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Tecno Pova Slim (94/100 vs 45/100). In the "display" category, the Tecno Pova Slim is a bit better (93/100 vs 84/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Tecno Pova Slim (96/100 vs 31/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Tecno Pova Slim (81/100 vs 51/100). In the "portability" category, the Tecno Pova Slim significantly outperforms the Vivo X300 Pro (100/100 vs 43/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Tecno Pova Slim | Vivo X300 Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 6400 | Dimensity 9500 | |
| AnTuTu | 581041 | 3326259 | |
| Geekbench Single | 803 | 3293 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2047 | 10243 | |
| Display | 6.8" AMOLED | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1224x2720 | 1260x2800 | |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5160 mAh | 6510 mAh | |
| Charging | 45W | 90W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 171 | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 13 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 4500 nits | 4500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP64 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 164.2×75.9×6.0 mm | 161.2×75.5×8.0 mm | |
| Weight | 156 g | 226 g | |
| Launch price | $230 | $899 |
Camera comparison
Tecno Pova Slim
- Main: 50MP
- Front: 13MP
Vivo X300 Pro
- Main: 200MP f/1.57
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Tecno Pova Slim
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1224x2720
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1260x2800
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Tecno Pova Slim
- 5160 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- No wireless charging
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6510 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 13:30 hrs, total 24:37 hrs
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 40W
Overall performance score
We compared Tecno Pova Slim and Vivo X300 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Pro leads Tecno Pova Slim by 82.5% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $669. Tecno Pova Slim was $669 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Tecno Pova Slim (94/100 vs 45/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Tecno Pova Slim is a bit better (93/100 vs 84/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Tecno Pova Slim (96/100 vs 31/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Tecno Pova Slim (81/100 vs 51/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Tecno Pova Slim significantly outperforms the Vivo X300 Pro (100/100 vs 43/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Tecno Pova Slim or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Tecno Pova Slim by 36 points (88/100 vs 52/100).
What is the rating of the Tecno Pova Slim and the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Tecno Pova Slim has a MobileRank rating of 52/100, the Vivo X300 Pro — 88/100.
Which has the better camera: the Tecno Pova Slim or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro leads on camera score (96/100 vs 31/100).
Which is more powerful: the Tecno Pova Slim or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro leads on performance (94/100 vs 45/100).
Should you choose the Tecno Pova Slim over the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.