Tecno Pova Slim vs Vivo X300s
The Tecno Pova Slim (2025) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 6400, while the Vivo X300s (2026) runs on the Dimensity 9500; launch prices were $230 and $723. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300s leads — 89/100 vs 52/100 (a 37-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300s has the bigger battery (7100 mAh vs 5160); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300s is faster in AnTuTu (3,703,823 vs 581,041); the Tecno Pova Slim is noticeably lighter (156g vs 217g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Tecno Pova Slim
Vivo X300s
What makes Tecno Pova Slim better?
- Lighter: 156g vs 217g
- Cheaper at launch: $230 vs $723
- Better portability (100/100 vs 42/100)
What makes Vivo X300s better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3703823 vs 581041
- Better Geekbench Single: 3293 vs 803
- Better Geekbench Multi: 10243 vs 2047
- Bigger battery: 7100 vs 5160 mAh
- Faster charging: 90W vs 45W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Higher performance (95/100 vs 45/100)
- Better camera (94/100 vs 31/100)
- Longer battery life (83/100 vs 51/100)
- Better display (94/100 vs 93/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Tecno Pova Slim vs the Vivo X300s, the Vivo X300s scores 37 points higher (89/100 vs 52/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300s leads (95/100 vs 45/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300s leads (94/100 vs 31/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300s leads (83/100 vs 51/100). Value score: Tecno Pova Slim — 58/100, Vivo X300s — 92/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300s significantly outperforms the Tecno Pova Slim (95/100 vs 45/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300s and the Tecno Pova Slim are nearly equal (94/100 vs 93/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300s significantly outperforms the Tecno Pova Slim (94/100 vs 31/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300s significantly outperforms the Tecno Pova Slim (83/100 vs 51/100). In the "portability" category, the Tecno Pova Slim significantly outperforms the Vivo X300s (100/100 vs 42/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Tecno Pova Slim | Vivo X300s | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 6400 | Dimensity 9500 | |
| AnTuTu | 581041 | 3703823 | |
| Geekbench Single | 803 | 3293 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2047 | 10243 | |
| Display | 6.8" AMOLED | 6.8" LTPO AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1224x2720 | 2800x1260 | |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 144 Hz | |
| Battery | 5160 mAh | 7100 mAh | |
| Charging | 45W | 90W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 40W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 13 MP | 50 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 16 / OriginOS 6 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 4500 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | — | |
| Protection | IP64 | — | |
| Dimensions | 164.2×75.9×6.0 mm | — | |
| Weight | 156 g | 217 g | |
| Launch price | $230 | $723 |
Camera comparison
Tecno Pova Slim
- Main: 50MP
- Front: 13MP
Vivo X300s
- Main: 200MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Display comparison
Tecno Pova Slim
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1224x2720
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Vivo X300s
- 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 2800x1260
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Battery and charging
Tecno Pova Slim
- 5160 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- No wireless charging
Vivo X300s
- 7100 mAh
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 40W
Overall performance score
We compared Tecno Pova Slim and Vivo X300s, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300s leads Tecno Pova Slim by 84.3% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $493. Tecno Pova Slim was $493 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300s significantly outperforms the Tecno Pova Slim (95/100 vs 45/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X300s and the Tecno Pova Slim are nearly equal (94/100 vs 93/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300s significantly outperforms the Tecno Pova Slim (94/100 vs 31/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300s significantly outperforms the Tecno Pova Slim (83/100 vs 51/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Tecno Pova Slim significantly outperforms the Vivo X300s (100/100 vs 42/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Tecno Pova Slim or the Vivo X300s?
The Vivo X300s significantly outperforms the Tecno Pova Slim by 37 points (89/100 vs 52/100).
What is the rating of the Tecno Pova Slim and the Vivo X300s?
The Tecno Pova Slim has a MobileRank rating of 52/100, the Vivo X300s — 89/100.
Which has the better camera: the Tecno Pova Slim or the Vivo X300s?
The Vivo X300s leads on camera score (94/100 vs 31/100).
Which is more powerful: the Tecno Pova Slim or the Vivo X300s?
The Vivo X300s leads on performance (95/100 vs 45/100).
Should you choose the Tecno Pova Slim over the Vivo X300s?
The Vivo X300s is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.