Tecno Pova Slim vs Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra
The Tecno Pova Slim (2025) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 6400, while the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9500M; launch prices were $230 and $548. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra leads — 75/100 vs 52/100 (a 23-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra has the bigger battery (9100 mAh vs 5160); the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (3,579,952 vs 581,041); the Tecno Pova Slim is noticeably lighter (156g vs 225g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Tecno Pova Slim
Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra
What makes Tecno Pova Slim better?
- Lighter: 156g vs 225g
- Cheaper at launch: $230 vs $548
- Better portability (100/100 vs 38/100)
What makes Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3579952 vs 581041
- Better Geekbench Single: 3293 vs 803
- Better Geekbench Multi: 10243 vs 2047
- Bigger battery: 9100 vs 5160 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 45W
- Higher performance (95/100 vs 45/100)
- Better camera (35/100 vs 31/100)
- Longer battery life (80/100 vs 51/100)
- Better display (99/100 vs 93/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Tecno Pova Slim vs the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra scores 23 points higher (75/100 vs 52/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra leads (95/100 vs 45/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra leads (80/100 vs 51/100). Value score: Tecno Pova Slim — 58/100, Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra — 68/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Pova Slim (95/100 vs 45/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra is a bit better (99/100 vs 93/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra and the Tecno Pova Slim are nearly equal (35/100 vs 31/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra notably outperforms the Tecno Pova Slim (80/100 vs 51/100). In the "portability" category, the Tecno Pova Slim significantly outperforms the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra (100/100 vs 38/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Tecno Pova Slim | Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 6400 | MediaTek Dimensity 9500M | |
| AnTuTu | 581041 | 3579952 | |
| Geekbench Single | 803 | 3293 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2047 | 10243 | |
| Display | 6.8" AMOLED | 6.8" LTPS AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1224x2720 | 1440x3200 | |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 144 Hz | |
| Battery | 5160 mAh | 9100 mAh | |
| Charging | 45W | 100W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 8 MP | |
| Front camera | 13 MP | 16 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 16 / OriginOS 6 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 4500 nits | 4500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP64 | IP68/IP69 | |
| Dimensions | 164.2×75.9×6.0 mm | 163.4×75.9×8.6 mm | |
| Weight | 156 g | 225 g | |
| Launch price | $230 | $548 |
Camera comparison
Tecno Pova Slim
- Main: 50MP
- Front: 13MP
Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra
- Main: 50MP f/1.88
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 16MP
Display comparison
Tecno Pova Slim
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1224x2720
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPS AMOLED
- Resolution: 1440x3200
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Battery and charging
Tecno Pova Slim
- 5160 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- No wireless charging
Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra
- 9100 mAh
- Wired: 100W
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Tecno Pova Slim and Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra leads Tecno Pova Slim by 83.8% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $318. Tecno Pova Slim was $318 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Pova Slim (95/100 vs 45/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra is a bit better (99/100 vs 93/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra and the Tecno Pova Slim are nearly equal (35/100 vs 31/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra notably outperforms the Tecno Pova Slim (80/100 vs 51/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Tecno Pova Slim significantly outperforms the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra (100/100 vs 38/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Tecno Pova Slim or the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra?
The Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Pova Slim by 23 points (75/100 vs 52/100).
What is the rating of the Tecno Pova Slim and the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra?
The Tecno Pova Slim has a MobileRank rating of 52/100, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra — 75/100.
Which is more powerful: the Tecno Pova Slim or the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra?
The Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra leads on performance (95/100 vs 45/100).
Should you choose the Tecno Pova Slim over the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra?
The Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life.