Tecno Pova Slim vs Vivo X300 Ultra
The Tecno Pova Slim (2025) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 6400, while the Vivo X300 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads — 91/100 vs 52/100 (a 39-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Ultra has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 5160); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,247,433 vs 550,018); the Tecno Pova Slim is noticeably lighter (156g vs 230g).
Tecno Pova Slim
Vivo X300 Ultra
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Lighter: 156g vs 230g
- Better display (93/100 vs 89/100)
- Better portability (100/100 vs 39/100)
- Higher AnTuTu: 4247433 vs 550018
- Better Geekbench Single: 3640 vs 803
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11033 vs 2047
- Bigger battery: 7000 vs 5160 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 45W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Higher performance (99/100 vs 44/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 31/100)
- Longer battery life (85/100 vs 51/100)
Comparing the Tecno Pova Slim vs the Vivo X300 Ultra, the Vivo X300 Ultra scores 39 points higher (91/100 vs 52/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (99/100 vs 44/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 31/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (85/100 vs 51/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Pova Slim (99/100 vs 44/100). In the "display" category, the Tecno Pova Slim and the Vivo X300 Ultra are nearly equal (93/100 vs 89/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Pova Slim (96/100 vs 31/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Pova Slim (85/100 vs 51/100). In the "portability" category, the Tecno Pova Slim significantly outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (100/100 vs 39/100).
| Specification | Tecno Pova Slim | Vivo X300 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 6400 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 550018 | 4247433 | |
| Geekbench Single | 803 | 3640 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2047 | 11033 | |
| Display | 6.8" AMOLED | 6.8" LTPO OLED | |
| Resolution | 1224x2720 | 3168x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5160 mAh | 7000 mAh | |
| Charging | 45W | 100W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 170 | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 200 MP | |
| Front camera | 13 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 15, HIOS 15 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 4500 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP64 | IP69 | |
| Dimensions | 164.2×75.9×6.0 mm | 163.0×76.8×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | 156 g | 230 g | |
| Price | — | $950 |
Tecno Pova Slim
- Main: 50MP
- Front: 13MP
Vivo X300 Ultra
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 32MP
Tecno Pova Slim
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1224x2720
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPO OLED
- Resolution: 3168x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Tecno Pova Slim
- 5160 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- No wireless charging
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 7000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 10:18 hrs, total 29:11 hrs
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 40W
We compared Tecno Pova Slim and Vivo X300 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Ultra leads Tecno Pova Slim by 87.1% in our overall performance rating.
Tecno Pova Slim
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Pova Slim (99/100 vs 44/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Tecno Pova Slim and the Vivo X300 Ultra are nearly equal (93/100 vs 89/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Pova Slim (96/100 vs 31/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Pova Slim (85/100 vs 51/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Tecno Pova Slim significantly outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (100/100 vs 39/100).
Which is better: the Tecno Pova Slim or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Pova Slim by 39 points (91/100 vs 52/100).
What is the rating of the Tecno Pova Slim and the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Tecno Pova Slim has a MobileRank rating of 52/100, the Vivo X300 Ultra — 91/100.
Which has the better camera: the Tecno Pova Slim or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on camera score (96/100 vs 31/100).
Which is more powerful: the Tecno Pova Slim or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on performance (99/100 vs 44/100).
Should you choose the Tecno Pova Slim over the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Tecno Pova Slim is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.