Tecno Phantom V Fold2 vs Vivo X300 Ultra
The Tecno Phantom V Fold2 (2024) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9000+, while the Vivo X300 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads — 91/100 vs 73/100 (a 18-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Ultra has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 5750); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,247,433 vs 1,453,683); the Vivo X300 Ultra is noticeably lighter (230g vs 249g).
Tecno Phantom V Fold2
Vivo X300 Ultra
- Better portability (52/100 vs 39/100)
- Higher AnTuTu: 4247433 vs 1453683
- Better Geekbench Single: 3640 vs 1967
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11033 vs 5401
- Bigger battery: 7000 vs 5750 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 70W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Faster wireless charging: 40W vs 15W
- Lighter: 230g vs 249g
- Higher performance (99/100 vs 73/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 78/100)
- Longer battery life (85/100 vs 68/100)
- Better display (89/100 vs 79/100)
Comparing the Tecno Phantom V Fold2 vs the Vivo X300 Ultra, the Vivo X300 Ultra scores 18 points higher (91/100 vs 73/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (99/100 vs 73/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 78/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (85/100 vs 68/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Tecno Phantom V Fold2 (99/100 vs 73/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (89/100 vs 79/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Tecno Phantom V Fold2 (96/100 vs 78/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Tecno Phantom V Fold2 (85/100 vs 68/100). In the "portability" category, the Tecno Phantom V Fold2 is a bit better (52/100 vs 39/100).
| Specification | Tecno Phantom V Fold2 | Vivo X300 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 9000+ | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 1453683 | 4247433 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1967 | 3640 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 5401 | 11033 | |
| Display | 7.8" Foldable LTPO AMOLED | 6.8" LTPO OLED | |
| Resolution | 2000x2296 | 3168x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5750 mAh | 7000 mAh | |
| Charging | 70W | 100W | |
| Wireless charging | 15W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 170 | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 512GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 14, up to 2 major Android upgrades, HiOS 14 Fold | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 1600 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP54 | IP69 | |
| Dimensions | 159.0×140.4×6.1 mm | 163.0×76.8×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | 249 g | 230 g | |
| Price | — | $950 |
Tecno Phantom V Fold2
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Vivo X300 Ultra
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 32MP
Tecno Phantom V Fold2
- 7.8" Foldable LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 2000x2296
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPO OLED
- Resolution: 3168x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Tecno Phantom V Fold2
- 5750 mAh
- Wired: 70W
- Wireless: 15W
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 7000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 10:18 hrs, total 29:11 hrs
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 40W
We compared Tecno Phantom V Fold2 and Vivo X300 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Ultra leads Tecno Phantom V Fold2 by 65.8% in our overall performance rating.
Tecno Phantom V Fold2
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Tecno Phantom V Fold2 (99/100 vs 73/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (89/100 vs 79/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Tecno Phantom V Fold2 (96/100 vs 78/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Tecno Phantom V Fold2 (85/100 vs 68/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Tecno Phantom V Fold2 is a bit better (52/100 vs 39/100).
Which is better: the Tecno Phantom V Fold2 or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra is noticeably better than the Tecno Phantom V Fold2 — the overall rating gap is 18 points.
What is the rating of the Tecno Phantom V Fold2 and the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Tecno Phantom V Fold2 has a MobileRank rating of 73/100, the Vivo X300 Ultra — 91/100.
Which has the better camera: the Tecno Phantom V Fold2 or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on camera score (96/100 vs 78/100).
Which is more powerful: the Tecno Phantom V Fold2 or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on performance (99/100 vs 73/100).
Should you choose the Tecno Phantom V Fold2 over the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Tecno Phantom V Fold2 is a better fit for active users. The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.