Tecno Camon 30 Premier vs Vivo X300 Ultra
The Tecno Camon 30 Premier (2024) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 8200 Ultimate, while the Vivo X300 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads — 91/100 vs 69/100 (a 22-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Ultra has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,247,433 vs 1,240,821); the Tecno Camon 30 Premier is noticeably lighter (210g vs 230g).
Tecno Camon 30 Premier
Vivo X300 Ultra
- Lighter: 210g vs 230g
- Better portability (54/100 vs 39/100)
- Higher AnTuTu: 4247433 vs 1240821
- Better Geekbench Single: 3640 vs 1256
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11033 vs 4207
- Bigger battery: 7000 vs 5000 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 70W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Higher performance (99/100 vs 65/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 81/100)
- Longer battery life (85/100 vs 53/100)
- Better display (89/100 vs 84/100)
Comparing the Tecno Camon 30 Premier vs the Vivo X300 Ultra, the Vivo X300 Ultra scores 22 points higher (91/100 vs 69/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (99/100 vs 65/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 81/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (85/100 vs 53/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon 30 Premier (99/100 vs 65/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (89/100 vs 84/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Tecno Camon 30 Premier (96/100 vs 81/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon 30 Premier (85/100 vs 53/100). In the "portability" category, the Tecno Camon 30 Premier notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (54/100 vs 39/100).
| Specification | Tecno Camon 30 Premier | Vivo X300 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 8200 Ultimate | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 1240821 | 4247433 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1256 | 3640 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 4207 | 11033 | |
| Display | 6.8" LTPO AMOLED | 6.8" LTPO OLED | |
| Resolution | 1264x2780 | 3168x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 7000 mAh | |
| Charging | 70W | 100W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 170 | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 512GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 14, up to 2 major Android upgrades, HIOS 14 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 1400 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP54 | IP69 | |
| Dimensions | 162.7×76.2×7.9 mm | 163.0×76.8×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | 210 g | 230 g | |
| Price | — | $950 |
Tecno Camon 30 Premier
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Vivo X300 Ultra
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 32MP
Tecno Camon 30 Premier
- 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 1264x2780
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPO OLED
- Resolution: 3168x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Tecno Camon 30 Premier
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 70W
- No wireless charging
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 7000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 10:18 hrs, total 29:11 hrs
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 40W
We compared Tecno Camon 30 Premier and Vivo X300 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Ultra leads Tecno Camon 30 Premier by 70.8% in our overall performance rating.
Tecno Camon 30 Premier
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon 30 Premier (99/100 vs 65/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (89/100 vs 84/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Tecno Camon 30 Premier (96/100 vs 81/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon 30 Premier (85/100 vs 53/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Tecno Camon 30 Premier notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (54/100 vs 39/100).
Which is better: the Tecno Camon 30 Premier or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon 30 Premier by 22 points (91/100 vs 69/100).
What is the rating of the Tecno Camon 30 Premier and the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Tecno Camon 30 Premier has a MobileRank rating of 69/100, the Vivo X300 Ultra — 91/100.
Which has the better camera: the Tecno Camon 30 Premier or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on camera score (96/100 vs 81/100).
Which is more powerful: the Tecno Camon 30 Premier or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on performance (99/100 vs 65/100).
Should you choose the Tecno Camon 30 Premier over the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Tecno Camon 30 Premier is a better fit for active users, mobile photography enthusiasts. The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.