Tecno Camon 50 Pro vs Vivo X300 Ultra
The Tecno Camon 50 Pro (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 7400 Ultimate, while the Vivo X300 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; launch prices were $320 and $950. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads — 91/100 vs 65/100 (a 26-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Ultra has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 6500); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,247,433 vs 1,059,715).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Tecno Camon 50 Pro
Vivo X300 Ultra
What makes Tecno Camon 50 Pro better?
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Cheaper at launch: $320 vs $950
- Better display (92/100 vs 89/100)
- Better portability (64/100 vs 39/100)
What makes Vivo X300 Ultra better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 4247433 vs 1059715
- Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 1061
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 3185
- Bigger battery: 7000 vs 6500 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 45W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Higher performance (99/100 vs 59/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 64/100)
- Longer battery life (85/100 vs 58/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Tecno Camon 50 Pro vs the Vivo X300 Ultra, the Vivo X300 Ultra scores 26 points higher (91/100 vs 65/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (99/100 vs 59/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 64/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (85/100 vs 58/100). Value score: Tecno Camon 50 Pro — 66/100, Vivo X300 Ultra — 94/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon 50 Pro (99/100 vs 59/100). In the "display" category, the Tecno Camon 50 Pro and the Vivo X300 Ultra are nearly equal (92/100 vs 89/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon 50 Pro (96/100 vs 64/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Tecno Camon 50 Pro (85/100 vs 58/100). In the "portability" category, the Tecno Camon 50 Pro notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (64/100 vs 39/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Tecno Camon 50 Pro | Vivo X300 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 7400 Ultimate | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 1059715 | 4247433 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1061 | 3639 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 3185 | 11047 | |
| Display | 6.8" AMOLED | 6.8" LTPO OLED | |
| Resolution | 1208x2644 | 3168x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 6500 mAh | 7000 mAh | |
| Charging | 45W | 100W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 170 | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB / 12GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 16, up to 3 major Android upgrades, HIOS 16 | Android 16 | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | IP69 | |
| Dimensions | 162.4×77.0×7.8 mm | 163.0×76.8×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | — | 230 g | |
| Launch price | $320 | $950 |
Camera comparison
Tecno Camon 50 Pro
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Vivo X300 Ultra
- Main: 200MP f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Tecno Camon 50 Pro
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1208x2644
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPO OLED
- Resolution: 3168x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Tecno Camon 50 Pro
- 6500 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- No wireless charging
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 7000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 10:18 hrs, total 29:11 hrs
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 40W
Overall performance score
We compared Tecno Camon 50 Pro and Vivo X300 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Ultra leads Tecno Camon 50 Pro by 75.1% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $630. Tecno Camon 50 Pro was $630 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon 50 Pro (99/100 vs 59/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Tecno Camon 50 Pro and the Vivo X300 Ultra are nearly equal (92/100 vs 89/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon 50 Pro (96/100 vs 64/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Tecno Camon 50 Pro (85/100 vs 58/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Tecno Camon 50 Pro notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (64/100 vs 39/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Tecno Camon 50 Pro or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon 50 Pro by 26 points (91/100 vs 65/100).
What is the rating of the Tecno Camon 50 Pro and the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Tecno Camon 50 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 65/100, the Vivo X300 Ultra — 91/100.
Which has the better camera: the Tecno Camon 50 Pro or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on camera score (96/100 vs 64/100).
Which is more powerful: the Tecno Camon 50 Pro or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on performance (99/100 vs 59/100).
Should you choose the Tecno Camon 50 Pro over the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.