Tecno Pova Slim vs Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra
The Tecno Pova Slim (2025) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 6400, while the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; launch prices were $230 and $799. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads — 89/100 vs 52/100 (a 37-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra has the bigger battery (7400 mAh vs 5160); the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,602,290 vs 581,041); the Tecno Pova Slim is noticeably lighter (156g vs 227g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Tecno Pova Slim
Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra
What makes Tecno Pova Slim better?
- Lighter: 156g vs 227g
- Cheaper at launch: $230 vs $799
- Better portability (100/100 vs 35/100)
What makes Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 4602290 vs 581041
- Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 803
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 2047
- Bigger battery: 7400 vs 5160 mAh
- Faster charging: 120W vs 45W
- Higher performance (99/100 vs 45/100)
- Better camera (78/100 vs 31/100)
- Longer battery life (92/100 vs 51/100)
- Better display (99/100 vs 93/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Tecno Pova Slim vs the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra scores 37 points higher (89/100 vs 52/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads (99/100 vs 45/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads (78/100 vs 31/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads (92/100 vs 51/100). Value score: Tecno Pova Slim — 58/100, Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra — 92/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Pova Slim (99/100 vs 45/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra is a bit better (99/100 vs 93/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Pova Slim (78/100 vs 31/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Pova Slim (92/100 vs 51/100). In the "portability" category, the Tecno Pova Slim significantly outperforms the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra (100/100 vs 35/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Tecno Pova Slim | Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 6400 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 581041 | 4602290 | |
| Geekbench Single | 803 | 3639 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2047 | 11047 | |
| Display | 6.8" AMOLED | 6.8" LTPO AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1224x2720 | 1440x3168 | |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 144 Hz | |
| Battery | 5160 mAh | 7400 mAh | |
| Charging | 45W | 120W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 50W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 13 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB | 12GB / 16GB / 24GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 4500 nits | 8000 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP64 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 164.2×75.9×6.0 mm | 163.7×76.8×8.7 mm | |
| Weight | 156 g | 227 g | |
| Launch price | $230 | $799 |
Camera comparison
Tecno Pova Slim
- Main: 50MP
- Front: 13MP
Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra
- Main: 50MP f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Tecno Pova Slim
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1224x2720
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 1440x3168
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Battery and charging
Tecno Pova Slim
- 5160 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- No wireless charging
Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra
- 7400 mAh
- Wired: 120W
- Wireless: 50W
Overall performance score
We compared Tecno Pova Slim and Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads Tecno Pova Slim by 87.4% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $569. Tecno Pova Slim was $569 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Pova Slim (99/100 vs 45/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra is a bit better (99/100 vs 93/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Pova Slim (78/100 vs 31/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Pova Slim (92/100 vs 51/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Tecno Pova Slim significantly outperforms the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra (100/100 vs 35/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Tecno Pova Slim or the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra?
The Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Pova Slim by 37 points (89/100 vs 52/100).
What is the rating of the Tecno Pova Slim and the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra?
The Tecno Pova Slim has a MobileRank rating of 52/100, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra — 89/100.
Which has the better camera: the Tecno Pova Slim or the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra?
The Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads on camera score (78/100 vs 31/100).
Which is more powerful: the Tecno Pova Slim or the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra?
The Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads on performance (99/100 vs 45/100).
Should you choose the Tecno Pova Slim over the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra?
The Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.