Tecno Camon 40 Premier vs Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra
The Tecno Camon 40 Premier (2025) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 8350, while the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; launch prices were $450 and $799. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads — 89/100 vs 73/100 (a 16-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra has the bigger battery (7400 mAh vs 5100); the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,602,290 vs 1,724,757); the Tecno Camon 40 Premier is noticeably lighter (193g vs 227g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Tecno Camon 40 Premier
Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra
What makes Tecno Camon 40 Premier better?
- Lighter: 193g vs 227g
- Cheaper at launch: $450 vs $799
- Better camera (81/100 vs 78/100)
- Better portability (66/100 vs 35/100)
What makes Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 4602290 vs 1724757
- Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 1398
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 4313
- Bigger battery: 7400 vs 5100 mAh
- Faster charging: 120W vs 70W
- Higher performance (99/100 vs 70/100)
- Longer battery life (92/100 vs 56/100)
- Better display (99/100 vs 94/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Tecno Camon 40 Premier vs the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra scores 16 points higher (89/100 vs 73/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads (99/100 vs 70/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads (92/100 vs 56/100). Value score: Tecno Camon 40 Premier — 70/100, Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra — 92/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra notably outperforms the Tecno Camon 40 Premier (99/100 vs 70/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra is a bit better (99/100 vs 94/100). In the "camera" category, the Tecno Camon 40 Premier and the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra are nearly equal (81/100 vs 78/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon 40 Premier (92/100 vs 56/100). In the "portability" category, the Tecno Camon 40 Premier significantly outperforms the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra (66/100 vs 35/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Tecno Camon 40 Premier | Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 8350 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 1724757 | 4602290 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1398 | 3639 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 4313 | 11047 | |
| Display | 6.7" LTPO AMOLED | 6.8" LTPO AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1260x2800 | 1440x3168 | |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 144 Hz | |
| Battery | 5100 mAh | 7400 mAh | |
| Charging | 70W | 120W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 50W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 12GB / 16GB / 24GB | |
| Storage | 256GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 8000 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 161.0×75.0×7.7 mm | 163.7×76.8×8.7 mm | |
| Weight | 193 g | 227 g | |
| Launch price | $450 | $799 |
Camera comparison
Tecno Camon 40 Premier
- Main: 50MP f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra
- Main: 50MP f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Tecno Camon 40 Premier
- 6.7" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 1260x2800
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 1440x3168
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Battery and charging
Tecno Camon 40 Premier
- 5100 mAh
- Wired: 70W
- No wireless charging
Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra
- 7400 mAh
- Wired: 120W
- Wireless: 50W
Overall performance score
We compared Tecno Camon 40 Premier and Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads Tecno Camon 40 Premier by 62.5% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $349. Tecno Camon 40 Premier was $349 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra notably outperforms the Tecno Camon 40 Premier (99/100 vs 70/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra is a bit better (99/100 vs 94/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Tecno Camon 40 Premier and the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra are nearly equal (81/100 vs 78/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon 40 Premier (92/100 vs 56/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Tecno Camon 40 Premier significantly outperforms the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra (66/100 vs 35/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Tecno Camon 40 Premier or the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra?
The Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra is noticeably better than the Tecno Camon 40 Premier — the overall rating gap is 16 points.
What is the rating of the Tecno Camon 40 Premier and the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra?
The Tecno Camon 40 Premier has a MobileRank rating of 73/100, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra — 89/100.
Which is more powerful: the Tecno Camon 40 Premier or the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra?
The Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads on performance (99/100 vs 70/100).
Should you choose the Tecno Camon 40 Premier over the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra?
The Tecno Camon 40 Premier is a better fit for active users, mobile photography enthusiasts. The Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.