Tecno Camon 40 Premier vs Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra

The Tecno Camon 40 Premier (2025) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 8350, while the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; launch prices were $450 and $799. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads — 89/100 vs 73/100 (a 16-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra has the bigger battery (7400 mAh vs 5100); the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,602,290 vs 1,724,757); the Tecno Camon 40 Premier is noticeably lighter (193g vs 227g).

The Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra is noticeably better than the Tecno Camon 40 Premier — the overall rating gap is 16 points.

Profile comparison

Category scores

Tecno Camon 40 Premier

Performance 70
Display 94
Camera 81
Battery 56
Portability 66
Value for money 70

Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra

Performance 99
Display 99
Camera 78
Battery 92
Portability 35
Value for money 92

What makes Tecno Camon 40 Premier better?

  • Lighter: 193g vs 227g
  • Cheaper at launch: $450 vs $799

  • Better camera (81/100 vs 78/100)
  • Better portability (66/100 vs 35/100)

What makes Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 4602290 vs 1724757
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 1398
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 4313
  • Bigger battery: 7400 vs 5100 mAh
  • Faster charging: 120W vs 70W

  • Higher performance (99/100 vs 70/100)
  • Longer battery life (92/100 vs 56/100)
  • Better display (99/100 vs 94/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Tecno Camon 40 Premier vs the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra scores 16 points higher (89/100 vs 73/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads (99/100 vs 70/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads (92/100 vs 56/100). Value score: Tecno Camon 40 Premier — 70/100, Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra — 92/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra notably outperforms the Tecno Camon 40 Premier (99/100 vs 70/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra is a bit better (99/100 vs 94/100). In the "camera" category, the Tecno Camon 40 Premier and the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra are nearly equal (81/100 vs 78/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon 40 Premier (92/100 vs 56/100). In the "portability" category, the Tecno Camon 40 Premier significantly outperforms the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra (66/100 vs 35/100).

Tecno Camon 40 Premier: The Tecno Camon 40 Premier is a better fit for active users, mobile photography enthusiasts.
Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra: The Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.

Specs comparison

Specification Tecno Camon 40 Premier Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra
Processor MediaTek Dimensity 8350 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
AnTuTu 1724757 4602290
Geekbench Single 1398 3639
Geekbench Multi 4313 11047
Display 6.7" LTPO AMOLED 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
Resolution 1260x2800 1440x3168
Refresh rate 144 Hz 144 Hz
Battery 5100 mAh 7400 mAh
Charging 70W 120W
Wireless charging 0W 50W
Main camera 50 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 50 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 50 MP 50 MP
Front camera 50 MP 32 MP
RAM 12GB 12GB / 16GB / 24GB
Storage 256GB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 15 Android 16
Brightness (peak) — 8000 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection — IP68
Dimensions 161.0×75.0×7.7 mm 163.7×76.8×8.7 mm
Weight 193 g 227 g
Launch price $450 $799

Camera comparison

Tecno Camon 40 Premier

  • Main: 50MP f/1.9
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 50MP
81
camera

Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra

  • Main: 50MP f/1.9
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 32MP
78
camera

Display comparison

Tecno Camon 40 Premier

  • 6.7" LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1260x2800
  • Refresh rate: 144 Hz
94
display

Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra

  • 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1440x3168
  • Refresh rate: 144 Hz
99
display

Battery and charging

Tecno Camon 40 Premier

  • 5100 mAh
  • Wired: 70W
  • No wireless charging
56
battery

Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra

  • 7400 mAh
  • Wired: 120W
  • Wireless: 50W
92
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Tecno Camon 40 Premier and Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Tecno Camon 40 Premier MediaTek Dimensity 8350
73/100
1724757 AnTuTu
Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
89/100 +62.5%
4602290 AnTuTu

Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads Tecno Camon 40 Premier by 62.5% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Tecno Camon 40 Premier

$450

Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra

$799

Launch price difference: $349. Tecno Camon 40 Premier was $349 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra notably outperforms the Tecno Camon 40 Premier (99/100 vs 70/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra is a bit better (99/100 vs 94/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Tecno Camon 40 Premier and the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra are nearly equal (81/100 vs 78/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon 40 Premier (92/100 vs 56/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Tecno Camon 40 Premier significantly outperforms the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra (66/100 vs 35/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Tecno Camon 40 Premier or the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra?

The Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra is noticeably better than the Tecno Camon 40 Premier — the overall rating gap is 16 points.

What is the rating of the Tecno Camon 40 Premier and the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra?

The Tecno Camon 40 Premier has a MobileRank rating of 73/100, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra — 89/100.

Which is more powerful: the Tecno Camon 40 Premier or the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra?

The Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads on performance (99/100 vs 70/100).

Should you choose the Tecno Camon 40 Premier over the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra?

The Tecno Camon 40 Premier is a better fit for active users, mobile photography enthusiasts. The Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.