Tecno Camon 40 Premier vs Vivo iQOO 15T

The Tecno Camon 40 Premier (2025) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 8350, while the Vivo iQOO 15T (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9500; launch prices were $450 and $499. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo iQOO 15T leads — 82/100 vs 73/100 (a 9-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo iQOO 15T has the bigger battery (8000 mAh vs 5100); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo iQOO 15T is faster in AnTuTu (4,704,310 vs 1,724,757); the Tecno Camon 40 Premier is noticeably lighter (193g vs 216g).

The Vivo iQOO 15T edges out the Tecno Camon 40 Premier by just 9 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.

Profile comparison

Category scores

Tecno Camon 40 Premier

Performance 70
Display 94
Camera 81
Battery 56
Portability 66
Value for money 70

Vivo iQOO 15T

Performance 97
Display 99
Camera 65
Battery 75
Portability 44
Value for money 86

What makes Tecno Camon 40 Premier better?

  • Lighter: 193g vs 216g
  • Cheaper at launch: $450 vs $499

  • Better camera (81/100 vs 65/100)
  • Better portability (66/100 vs 44/100)

What makes Vivo iQOO 15T better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 4704310 vs 1724757
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3293 vs 1398
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 10243 vs 4313
  • Bigger battery: 8000 vs 5100 mAh
  • Faster charging: 100W vs 70W
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP

  • Higher performance (97/100 vs 70/100)
  • Longer battery life (75/100 vs 56/100)
  • Better display (99/100 vs 94/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Tecno Camon 40 Premier vs the Vivo iQOO 15T, the Vivo iQOO 15T scores 9 points higher (82/100 vs 73/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 15T leads (97/100 vs 70/100). In the "camera" category, the Tecno Camon 40 Premier leads (81/100 vs 65/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 15T leads (75/100 vs 56/100). Value score: Tecno Camon 40 Premier — 70/100, Vivo iQOO 15T — 86/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 15T notably outperforms the Tecno Camon 40 Premier (97/100 vs 70/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 15T is a bit better (99/100 vs 94/100). In the "camera" category, the Tecno Camon 40 Premier notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO 15T (81/100 vs 65/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 15T notably outperforms the Tecno Camon 40 Premier (75/100 vs 56/100). In the "portability" category, the Tecno Camon 40 Premier notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO 15T (66/100 vs 44/100).

Tecno Camon 40 Premier: The Tecno Camon 40 Premier is a better fit for active users, mobile photography enthusiasts.
Vivo iQOO 15T: The Vivo iQOO 15T is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.

Specs comparison

Specification Tecno Camon 40 Premier Vivo iQOO 15T
Processor MediaTek Dimensity 8350 MediaTek Dimensity 9500
AnTuTu 1724757 4704310
Geekbench Single 1398 3293
Geekbench Multi 4313 10243
Display 6.7" LTPO AMOLED 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
Resolution 1260x2800 1440x3168
Refresh rate 144 Hz 144 Hz
Battery 5100 mAh 8000 mAh
Charging 70W 100W
Main camera 50 MP 200 MP
Ultrawide 50 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 50 MP 0 MP
Front camera 50 MP 16 MP
RAM 12GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 256GB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 15 Android 16
NFC yes yes
Protection — IP68
Dimensions 161.0×75.0×7.7 mm —
Weight 193 g 216 g
Launch price $450 $499

Camera comparison

Tecno Camon 40 Premier

  • Main: 50MP f/1.9
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 50MP
81
camera

Vivo iQOO 15T

  • Main: 200MP f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Front: 16MP
65
camera

Display comparison

Tecno Camon 40 Premier

  • 6.7" LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1260x2800
  • Refresh rate: 144 Hz
94
display

Vivo iQOO 15T

  • 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1440x3168
  • Refresh rate: 144 Hz
99
display

Battery and charging

Tecno Camon 40 Premier

  • 5100 mAh
  • Wired: 70W
  • No wireless charging
56
battery

Vivo iQOO 15T

  • 8000 mAh
  • Wired: 100W
  • No wireless charging
75
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Tecno Camon 40 Premier and Vivo iQOO 15T, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Tecno Camon 40 Premier MediaTek Dimensity 8350
73/100
1724757 AnTuTu
Vivo iQOO 15T MediaTek Dimensity 9500
82/100 +63.3%
4704310 AnTuTu

Vivo iQOO 15T leads Tecno Camon 40 Premier by 63.3% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Tecno Camon 40 Premier

$450

Vivo iQOO 15T

$499

Launch price difference: $49. Tecno Camon 40 Premier was $49 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 15T notably outperforms the Tecno Camon 40 Premier (97/100 vs 70/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 15T is a bit better (99/100 vs 94/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Tecno Camon 40 Premier notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO 15T (81/100 vs 65/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 15T notably outperforms the Tecno Camon 40 Premier (75/100 vs 56/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Tecno Camon 40 Premier notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO 15T (66/100 vs 44/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Tecno Camon 40 Premier or the Vivo iQOO 15T?

The Vivo iQOO 15T edges out the Tecno Camon 40 Premier by just 9 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.

What is the rating of the Tecno Camon 40 Premier and the Vivo iQOO 15T?

The Tecno Camon 40 Premier has a MobileRank rating of 73/100, the Vivo iQOO 15T — 82/100.

Which has the better camera: the Tecno Camon 40 Premier or the Vivo iQOO 15T?

The Tecno Camon 40 Premier leads on camera score (81/100 vs 65/100).

Which is more powerful: the Tecno Camon 40 Premier or the Vivo iQOO 15T?

The Vivo iQOO 15T leads on performance (97/100 vs 70/100).

Should you choose the Tecno Camon 40 Premier over the Vivo iQOO 15T?

The Tecno Camon 40 Premier is a better fit for active users, mobile photography enthusiasts. The Vivo iQOO 15T is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.