Tecno Camon 40 Premier vs Vivo X300 Pro
The Tecno Camon 40 Premier (2025) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 8350, while the Vivo X300 Pro (2025) runs on the Dimensity 9500; launch prices were $450 and $899. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Pro leads — 88/100 vs 73/100 (a 15-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Pro has the bigger battery (6510 mAh vs 5100); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,326,259 vs 1,724,757); the Tecno Camon 40 Premier is noticeably lighter (193g vs 226g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Tecno Camon 40 Premier
Vivo X300 Pro
What makes Tecno Camon 40 Premier better?
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Lighter: 193g vs 226g
- Cheaper at launch: $450 vs $899
- Better display (94/100 vs 84/100)
- Better portability (66/100 vs 43/100)
What makes Vivo X300 Pro better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3326259 vs 1724757
- Better Geekbench Single: 3293 vs 1398
- Better Geekbench Multi: 10243 vs 4313
- Bigger battery: 6510 vs 5100 mAh
- Faster charging: 90W vs 70W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Higher performance (94/100 vs 70/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 81/100)
- Longer battery life (81/100 vs 56/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Tecno Camon 40 Premier vs the Vivo X300 Pro, the Vivo X300 Pro scores 15 points higher (88/100 vs 73/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (94/100 vs 70/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (96/100 vs 81/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (81/100 vs 56/100). Value score: Tecno Camon 40 Premier — 70/100, Vivo X300 Pro — 88/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Tecno Camon 40 Premier (94/100 vs 70/100). In the "display" category, the Tecno Camon 40 Premier is a bit better (94/100 vs 84/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Tecno Camon 40 Premier (96/100 vs 81/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Tecno Camon 40 Premier (81/100 vs 56/100). In the "portability" category, the Tecno Camon 40 Premier notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Pro (66/100 vs 43/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Tecno Camon 40 Premier | Vivo X300 Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 8350 | Dimensity 9500 | |
| AnTuTu | 1724757 | 3326259 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1398 | 3293 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 4313 | 10243 | |
| Display | 6.7" LTPO AMOLED | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1260x2800 | 1260x2800 | |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5100 mAh | 6510 mAh | |
| Charging | 70W | 90W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 171 | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 4500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 161.0×75.0×7.7 mm | 161.2×75.5×8.0 mm | |
| Weight | 193 g | 226 g | |
| Launch price | $450 | $899 |
Camera comparison
Tecno Camon 40 Premier
- Main: 50MP f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Vivo X300 Pro
- Main: 200MP f/1.57
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Tecno Camon 40 Premier
- 6.7" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 1260x2800
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1260x2800
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Tecno Camon 40 Premier
- 5100 mAh
- Wired: 70W
- No wireless charging
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6510 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 13:30 hrs, total 24:37 hrs
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 40W
Overall performance score
We compared Tecno Camon 40 Premier and Vivo X300 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Pro leads Tecno Camon 40 Premier by 48.1% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $449. Tecno Camon 40 Premier was $449 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Tecno Camon 40 Premier (94/100 vs 70/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Tecno Camon 40 Premier is a bit better (94/100 vs 84/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Tecno Camon 40 Premier (96/100 vs 81/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Tecno Camon 40 Premier (81/100 vs 56/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Tecno Camon 40 Premier notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Pro (66/100 vs 43/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Tecno Camon 40 Premier or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro is noticeably better than the Tecno Camon 40 Premier — the overall rating gap is 15 points.
What is the rating of the Tecno Camon 40 Premier and the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Tecno Camon 40 Premier has a MobileRank rating of 73/100, the Vivo X300 Pro — 88/100.
Which has the better camera: the Tecno Camon 40 Premier or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro leads on camera score (96/100 vs 81/100).
Which is more powerful: the Tecno Camon 40 Premier or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro leads on performance (94/100 vs 70/100).
Should you choose the Tecno Camon 40 Premier over the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Tecno Camon 40 Premier is a better fit for active users, mobile photography enthusiasts. The Vivo X300 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.