Tecno Pova 7 Ultra vs Vivo X300 Pro
The Tecno Pova 7 Ultra (2025) runs on the Dimensity 8350 Ultimate, while the Vivo X300 Pro (2025) runs on the Dimensity 9500; launch prices were $300 and $899. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Pro leads — 88/100 vs 65/100 (a 23-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Pro has the bigger battery (6510 mAh vs 6000); the main camera is 108 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,326,259 vs 1,673,316); the Tecno Pova 7 Ultra is noticeably lighter (209g vs 226g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Tecno Pova 7 Ultra
Vivo X300 Pro
What makes Tecno Pova 7 Ultra better?
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Lighter: 209g vs 226g
- Cheaper at launch: $300 vs $899
- Better display (94/100 vs 84/100)
- Better portability (44/100 vs 43/100)
What makes Vivo X300 Pro better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3326259 vs 1673316
- Better Geekbench Single: 3293 vs 1398
- Better Geekbench Multi: 10243 vs 4313
- Bigger battery: 6510 vs 6000 mAh
- Faster charging: 90W vs 70W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 108MP
- Faster wireless charging: 40W vs 30W
- Higher performance (94/100 vs 69/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 43/100)
- Longer battery life (81/100 vs 72/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Tecno Pova 7 Ultra vs the Vivo X300 Pro, the Vivo X300 Pro scores 23 points higher (88/100 vs 65/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (94/100 vs 69/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (96/100 vs 43/100). Value score: Tecno Pova 7 Ultra — 68/100, Vivo X300 Pro — 88/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Tecno Pova 7 Ultra (94/100 vs 69/100). In the "display" category, the Tecno Pova 7 Ultra is a bit better (94/100 vs 84/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Tecno Pova 7 Ultra (96/100 vs 43/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro is a bit better (81/100 vs 72/100). In the "portability" category, the Tecno Pova 7 Ultra and the Vivo X300 Pro are nearly equal (44/100 vs 43/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Tecno Pova 7 Ultra | Vivo X300 Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Dimensity 8350 Ultimate | Dimensity 9500 | |
| AnTuTu | 1673316 | 3326259 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1398 | 3293 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 4313 | 10243 | |
| Display | 6.7" AMOLED | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1260x2800 | 1260x2800 | |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 6000 mAh | 6510 mAh | |
| Charging | 70W | 90W | |
| Wireless charging | 30W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 171 | |
| Main camera | 108 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 13 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB / 12GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 15 / HIOS 15 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 4500 nits | 4500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP64 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 160.0×75.2×8.9 mm | 161.2×75.5×8.0 mm | |
| Weight | 209 g | 226 g | |
| Launch price | $300 | $899 |
Camera comparison
Tecno Pova 7 Ultra
- Main: 108MP
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 13MP
Vivo X300 Pro
- Main: 200MP f/1.57
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Tecno Pova 7 Ultra
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1260x2800
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1260x2800
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Tecno Pova 7 Ultra
- 6000 mAh
- Wired: 70W
- Wireless: 30W
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6510 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 13:30 hrs, total 24:37 hrs
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 40W
Overall performance score
We compared Tecno Pova 7 Ultra and Vivo X300 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Pro leads Tecno Pova 7 Ultra by 49.7% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $599. Tecno Pova 7 Ultra was $599 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Tecno Pova 7 Ultra (94/100 vs 69/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Tecno Pova 7 Ultra is a bit better (94/100 vs 84/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Tecno Pova 7 Ultra (96/100 vs 43/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro is a bit better (81/100 vs 72/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Tecno Pova 7 Ultra and the Vivo X300 Pro are nearly equal (44/100 vs 43/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Tecno Pova 7 Ultra or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Tecno Pova 7 Ultra by 23 points (88/100 vs 65/100).
What is the rating of the Tecno Pova 7 Ultra and the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Tecno Pova 7 Ultra has a MobileRank rating of 65/100, the Vivo X300 Pro — 88/100.
Which has the better camera: the Tecno Pova 7 Ultra or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro leads on camera score (96/100 vs 43/100).
Which is more powerful: the Tecno Pova 7 Ultra or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro leads on performance (94/100 vs 69/100).
Should you choose the Tecno Pova 7 Ultra over the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Tecno Pova 7 Ultra is a better fit for active users. The Vivo X300 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.