Tecno Pova Curve 2 vs Vivo X300 Ultra
The Tecno Pova Curve 2 (2026) runs on the Dimensity 7100, while the Vivo X300 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; launch prices were $229 and $950. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads — 91/100 vs 56/100 (a 35-point difference). Key differences: the Tecno Pova Curve 2 has the bigger battery (8000 mAh vs 7000); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,247,433 vs 835,566); the Tecno Pova Curve 2 is noticeably lighter (195g vs 230g).
Tecno Pova Curve 2
Vivo X300 Ultra
- Bigger battery: 8000 vs 7000 mAh
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Lighter: 195g vs 230g
- Cheaper at launch: $229 vs $950
- Better portability (68/100 vs 39/100)
- Higher AnTuTu: 4247433 vs 835566
- Better Geekbench Single: 3640 vs 995
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11033 vs 2925
- Faster charging: 100W vs 45W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Higher performance (99/100 vs 55/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 31/100)
- Longer battery life (85/100 vs 64/100)
- Better display (89/100 vs 88/100)
Comparing the Tecno Pova Curve 2 vs the Vivo X300 Ultra, the Vivo X300 Ultra scores 35 points higher (91/100 vs 56/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (99/100 vs 55/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 31/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (85/100 vs 64/100). Value score: Tecno Pova Curve 2 — 70/100, Vivo X300 Ultra — 94/100; it is biased by price level, so it should not be compared directly between devices at different prices. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Pova Curve 2 (99/100 vs 55/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra and the Tecno Pova Curve 2 are nearly equal (89/100 vs 88/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Pova Curve 2 (96/100 vs 31/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Tecno Pova Curve 2 (85/100 vs 64/100). In the "portability" category, the Tecno Pova Curve 2 notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (68/100 vs 39/100).
| Specification | Tecno Pova Curve 2 | Vivo X300 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Dimensity 7100 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 835566 | 4247433 | |
| Geekbench Single | 995 | 3640 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2925 | 11033 | |
| Display | 6.8" AMOLED | 6.8" LTPO OLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2364 | 3168x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 8000 mAh | 7000 mAh | |
| Charging | 45W | 100W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 170 | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 200 MP | |
| Front camera | 13 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB / 12GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 4500 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP64 | IP69 | |
| Dimensions | 162.7×77.2×7.4 mm | 163.0×76.8×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | 195 g | 230 g | |
| Launch price | $229 | $950 |
Tecno Pova Curve 2
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 13MP
Vivo X300 Ultra
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 32MP
Tecno Pova Curve 2
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2364
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPO OLED
- Resolution: 3168x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Tecno Pova Curve 2
- 8000 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- No wireless charging
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 7000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 10:18 hrs, total 29:11 hrs
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 40W
We compared Tecno Pova Curve 2 and Vivo X300 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Ultra leads Tecno Pova Curve 2 by 80.3% in our overall performance rating.
Launch price difference: $721. Tecno Pova Curve 2 was $721 cheaper at launch.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Pova Curve 2 (99/100 vs 55/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra and the Tecno Pova Curve 2 are nearly equal (89/100 vs 88/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Pova Curve 2 (96/100 vs 31/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Tecno Pova Curve 2 (85/100 vs 64/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Tecno Pova Curve 2 notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (68/100 vs 39/100).
Which is better: the Tecno Pova Curve 2 or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Pova Curve 2 by 35 points (91/100 vs 56/100).
What is the rating of the Tecno Pova Curve 2 and the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Tecno Pova Curve 2 has a MobileRank rating of 56/100, the Vivo X300 Ultra — 91/100.
Which has the better camera: the Tecno Pova Curve 2 or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on camera score (96/100 vs 31/100).
Which is more powerful: the Tecno Pova Curve 2 or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on performance (99/100 vs 55/100).
Should you choose the Tecno Pova Curve 2 over the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Tecno Pova Curve 2 is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.