Tecno Pova Curve 2 vs Vivo X300 Ultra

The Tecno Pova Curve 2 (2026) runs on the Dimensity 7100, while the Vivo X300 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; launch prices were $229 and $950. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads — 91/100 vs 55/100 (a 36-point difference). Key differences: the Tecno Pova Curve 2 has the bigger battery (8000 mAh vs 7000); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,247,433 vs 785,352); the Tecno Pova Curve 2 is noticeably lighter (195g vs 230g).

The Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Pova Curve 2 by 36 points (91/100 vs 55/100).

Profile comparison

Category scores

Tecno Pova Curve 2

Performance 54
Display 88
Camera 31
Battery 64
Portability 68
Value for money 64

Vivo X300 Ultra

Performance 99
Display 89
Camera 96
Battery 85
Portability 39
Value for money 94

What makes Tecno Pova Curve 2 better?

  • Bigger battery: 8000 vs 7000 mAh
  • Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
  • Lighter: 195g vs 230g
  • Cheaper at launch: $229 vs $950

  • Better portability (68/100 vs 39/100)

What makes Vivo X300 Ultra better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 4247433 vs 785352
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 995
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 2925
  • Faster charging: 100W vs 45W
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP

  • Higher performance (99/100 vs 54/100)
  • Better camera (96/100 vs 31/100)
  • Longer battery life (85/100 vs 64/100)
  • Better display (89/100 vs 88/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Tecno Pova Curve 2 vs the Vivo X300 Ultra, the Vivo X300 Ultra scores 36 points higher (91/100 vs 55/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (99/100 vs 54/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 31/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (85/100 vs 64/100). Value score: Tecno Pova Curve 2 — 64/100, Vivo X300 Ultra — 94/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Pova Curve 2 (99/100 vs 54/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra and the Tecno Pova Curve 2 are nearly equal (89/100 vs 88/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Pova Curve 2 (96/100 vs 31/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Tecno Pova Curve 2 (85/100 vs 64/100). In the "portability" category, the Tecno Pova Curve 2 notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (68/100 vs 39/100).

Vivo X300 Ultra: The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.

Specs comparison

Specification Tecno Pova Curve 2 Vivo X300 Ultra
Processor Dimensity 7100 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
AnTuTu 785352 4247433
Geekbench Single 995 3639
Geekbench Multi 2925 11047
Display 6.8" AMOLED 6.8" LTPO OLED
Resolution 1080x2364 3168x1440
Refresh rate 144 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 8000 mAh 7000 mAh
Charging 45W 100W
Wireless charging 0W 40W
DXOMark (camera) — 170
Main camera 50 MP 200 MP
Ultrawide 0 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 200 MP
Front camera 13 MP 32 MP
RAM 8GB / 12GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 128GB / 256GB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 16 Android 16
Brightness (peak) 4500 nits —
NFC yes yes
Protection IP64 IP69
Dimensions 162.7×77.2×7.4 mm 163.0×76.8×8.2 mm
Weight 195 g 230 g
Launch price $229 $950

Camera comparison

Tecno Pova Curve 2

  • Main: 50MP f/1.8
  • Front: 13MP
31
camera

Vivo X300 Ultra

  • Main: 200MP f/1.6
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 200MP
  • Front: 32MP
96
camera

Display comparison

Tecno Pova Curve 2

  • 6.8" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1080x2364
  • Refresh rate: 144 Hz
88
display

Vivo X300 Ultra

  • 6.8" LTPO OLED
  • Resolution: 3168x1440
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
89
display

Battery and charging

Tecno Pova Curve 2

  • 8000 mAh
  • Wired: 45W
  • No wireless charging
64
battery

Vivo X300 Ultra

  • 7000 mAh
  • NanoReview test: web browsing 10:18 hrs, total 29:11 hrs
  • Wired: 100W
  • Wireless: 40W
85
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Tecno Pova Curve 2 and Vivo X300 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Tecno Pova Curve 2 Dimensity 7100
55/100
785352 AnTuTu
Vivo X300 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
91/100 +81.5%
4247433 AnTuTu

Vivo X300 Ultra leads Tecno Pova Curve 2 by 81.5% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Tecno Pova Curve 2

$229

Vivo X300 Ultra

$950

Launch price difference: $721. Tecno Pova Curve 2 was $721 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Pova Curve 2 (99/100 vs 54/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra and the Tecno Pova Curve 2 are nearly equal (89/100 vs 88/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Pova Curve 2 (96/100 vs 31/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Tecno Pova Curve 2 (85/100 vs 64/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Tecno Pova Curve 2 notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (68/100 vs 39/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Tecno Pova Curve 2 or the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Pova Curve 2 by 36 points (91/100 vs 55/100).

What is the rating of the Tecno Pova Curve 2 and the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Tecno Pova Curve 2 has a MobileRank rating of 55/100, the Vivo X300 Ultra — 91/100.

Which has the better camera: the Tecno Pova Curve 2 or the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on camera score (96/100 vs 31/100).

Which is more powerful: the Tecno Pova Curve 2 or the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on performance (99/100 vs 54/100).

Should you choose the Tecno Pova Curve 2 over the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.