Tecno Pova Curve 2 vs Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra

The Tecno Pova Curve 2 (2026) runs on the Dimensity 7100, while the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; estimated prices are $229 and $799. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads — 84/100 vs 35/100 (a 49-point difference). Key differences: the Tecno Pova Curve 2 has the bigger battery (8000 mAh vs 7400); the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,602,290 vs 835,566); the Tecno Pova Curve 2 is noticeably lighter (195g vs 227g).

The Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Pova Curve 2 by 49 points (84/100 vs 35/100).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Tecno Pova Curve 2
Performance 1
Display 100
Camera 26
Battery 60
Design 56
Value for money 94
Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra
Performance 97
Display 100
Camera 74
Battery 86
Design 16
Value for money 55
What makes Tecno Pova Curve 2 better?
  • Bigger battery: 8000 vs 7400 mAh
  • Lighter: 195g vs 227g
  • Cheaper: $229 vs $799

  • Better design/ergonomics (56/100 vs 16/100)
  • Better value for money (94/100 vs 55/100)
What makes Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 4602290 vs 835566
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3640 vs 995
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 11033 vs 2925
  • Faster charging: 120W vs 45W

  • Higher performance (97/100 vs 1/100)
  • Better camera (74/100 vs 26/100)
  • Longer battery life (86/100 vs 60/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Tecno Pova Curve 2 vs the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra scores 49 points higher (84/100 vs 35/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads (97/100 vs 1/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads (74/100 vs 26/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads (86/100 vs 60/100). In the "value for money" category, the Tecno Pova Curve 2 leads (94/100 vs 55/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Pova Curve 2 (97/100 vs 1/100). In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100. In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Pova Curve 2 (74/100 vs 26/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra notably outperforms the Tecno Pova Curve 2 (86/100 vs 60/100). In the "design" category, the Tecno Pova Curve 2 significantly outperforms the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra (56/100 vs 16/100). In the "value for money" category, the Tecno Pova Curve 2 significantly outperforms the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra (94/100 vs 55/100).

Tecno Pova Curve 2: The Tecno Pova Curve 2 is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers.
Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra: The Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life.
Specs comparison
Specification Tecno Pova Curve 2 Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra
Processor Dimensity 7100 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
AnTuTu 835566 4602290
Geekbench Single 995 3640
Geekbench Multi 2925 11033
Display 6.8" AMOLED 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
Resolution 1080x2364 1440x3168
Refresh rate 144 Hz 144 Hz
Battery 8000 mAh 7400 mAh
Charging 45W 120W
Wireless charging 0W 50W
Main camera 50 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 0 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 50 MP
Front camera 13 MP 32 MP
RAM 8GB / 12GB 12GB / 16GB / 24GB
Storage 128GB / 256GB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 16 Android 16
Brightness (peak) 4500 nits 8000 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP64 IP68
Dimensions 162.7×77.2×7.4 mm 163.7×76.8×8.7 mm
Weight 195 g 227 g
Price $229 $799
Camera comparison
Tecno Pova Curve 2
  • Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
  • Front: 13MP
26
camera
Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra
  • Main: 50MP f/f/1.9
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 32MP
74
camera
Display comparison
Tecno Pova Curve 2
  • 6.8" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1080x2364
  • Refresh rate: 144 Hz
100
display
Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra
  • 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1440x3168
  • Refresh rate: 144 Hz
100
display
Battery and charging
Tecno Pova Curve 2
  • 8000 mAh
  • Wired: 45W
  • No wireless charging
60
battery
Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra
  • 7400 mAh
  • Wired: 120W
  • Wireless: 50W
86
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Tecno Pova Curve 2 and Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Tecno Pova Curve 2 Dimensity 7100
35/100
835566 AnTuTu
Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
84/100 +81.8%
4602290 AnTuTu

Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads Tecno Pova Curve 2 by 81.8% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Price and availability
Tecno Pova Curve 2
$229
Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra
$799

Price difference: $570. Tecno Pova Curve 2 is cheaper by $570.

Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Pova Curve 2 (97/100 vs 1/100).

display

In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.

camera

In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Pova Curve 2 (74/100 vs 26/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra notably outperforms the Tecno Pova Curve 2 (86/100 vs 60/100).

design

In the "design" category, the Tecno Pova Curve 2 significantly outperforms the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra (56/100 vs 16/100).

value for money

In the "value for money" category, the Tecno Pova Curve 2 significantly outperforms the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra (94/100 vs 55/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Tecno Pova Curve 2 or the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra?

The Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Pova Curve 2 by 49 points (84/100 vs 35/100).

What is the rating of the Tecno Pova Curve 2 and the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra?

The Tecno Pova Curve 2 has a MobileRank rating of 35/100, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra — 84/100.

Which has the better camera: the Tecno Pova Curve 2 or the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra?

The Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads on camera score (74/100 vs 26/100).

Which is more powerful: the Tecno Pova Curve 2 or the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra?

The Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads on performance (97/100 vs 1/100).

Should you choose the Tecno Pova Curve 2 over the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra?

The Tecno Pova Curve 2 is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers. The Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life.