Tecno Pova Curve 2 vs Vivo iQOO 16
The Tecno Pova Curve 2 (2026) runs on the Dimensity 7100, while the Vivo iQOO 16 (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Extreme Gen 6; launch prices were $229 and $840. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo iQOO 16 leads — 89/100 vs 55/100 (a 34-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo iQOO 16 has the bigger battery (8400 mAh vs 8000); the Vivo iQOO 16 is faster in AnTuTu (5,498,720 vs 785,352); the Tecno Pova Curve 2 is noticeably lighter (195g vs 223g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Tecno Pova Curve 2
Vivo iQOO 16
What makes Tecno Pova Curve 2 better?
- Lighter: 195g vs 223g
- Cheaper at launch: $229 vs $840
- Better portability (68/100 vs 42/100)
What makes Vivo iQOO 16 better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 5498720 vs 785352
- Better Geekbench Single: 4327 vs 995
- Better Geekbench Multi: 12873 vs 2925
- Bigger battery: 8400 vs 8000 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 45W
- Higher refresh rate: 165Hz vs 144Hz
- Higher performance (100/100 vs 54/100)
- Better camera (78/100 vs 31/100)
- Longer battery life (90/100 vs 64/100)
- Better display (99/100 vs 88/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Tecno Pova Curve 2 vs the Vivo iQOO 16, the Vivo iQOO 16 scores 34 points higher (89/100 vs 55/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 leads (100/100 vs 54/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 leads (78/100 vs 31/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 leads (90/100 vs 64/100). Value score: Tecno Pova Curve 2 — 64/100, Vivo iQOO 16 — 92/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 significantly outperforms the Tecno Pova Curve 2 (100/100 vs 54/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 is a bit better (99/100 vs 88/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 significantly outperforms the Tecno Pova Curve 2 (78/100 vs 31/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 notably outperforms the Tecno Pova Curve 2 (90/100 vs 64/100). In the "portability" category, the Tecno Pova Curve 2 notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO 16 (68/100 vs 42/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Tecno Pova Curve 2 | Vivo iQOO 16 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Dimensity 7100 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Extreme Gen 6 | |
| AnTuTu | 785352 | 5498720 | |
| Geekbench Single | 995 | 4327 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2925 | 12873 | |
| Display | 6.8" AMOLED | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2364 | 1440x3168 | |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 165 Hz | |
| Battery | 8000 mAh | 8400 mAh | |
| Charging | 45W | 100W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 40W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 13 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB / 12GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 17 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 4500 nits | 6000 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP64 | IP68/IP69 | |
| Dimensions | 162.7×77.2×7.4 mm | 163.8×76.9×8.3 mm | |
| Weight | 195 g | 223 g | |
| Launch price | $229 | $840 |
Camera comparison
Tecno Pova Curve 2
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Front: 13MP
Vivo iQOO 16
- Main: 50MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Tecno Pova Curve 2
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2364
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Vivo iQOO 16
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1440x3168
- Refresh rate: 165 Hz
Battery and charging
Tecno Pova Curve 2
- 8000 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- No wireless charging
Vivo iQOO 16
- 8400 mAh
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 40W
Overall performance score
We compared Tecno Pova Curve 2 and Vivo iQOO 16, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo iQOO 16 leads Tecno Pova Curve 2 by 85.7% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $611. Tecno Pova Curve 2 was $611 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 significantly outperforms the Tecno Pova Curve 2 (100/100 vs 54/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 is a bit better (99/100 vs 88/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 significantly outperforms the Tecno Pova Curve 2 (78/100 vs 31/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 notably outperforms the Tecno Pova Curve 2 (90/100 vs 64/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Tecno Pova Curve 2 notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO 16 (68/100 vs 42/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Tecno Pova Curve 2 or the Vivo iQOO 16?
The Vivo iQOO 16 significantly outperforms the Tecno Pova Curve 2 by 34 points (89/100 vs 55/100).
What is the rating of the Tecno Pova Curve 2 and the Vivo iQOO 16?
The Tecno Pova Curve 2 has a MobileRank rating of 55/100, the Vivo iQOO 16 — 89/100.
Which has the better camera: the Tecno Pova Curve 2 or the Vivo iQOO 16?
The Vivo iQOO 16 leads on camera score (78/100 vs 31/100).
Which is more powerful: the Tecno Pova Curve 2 or the Vivo iQOO 16?
The Vivo iQOO 16 leads on performance (100/100 vs 54/100).
Should you choose the Tecno Pova Curve 2 over the Vivo iQOO 16?
The Vivo iQOO 16 is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.