Tecno Camon 30 Pro vs Vivo iQOO 16
The Tecno Camon 30 Pro (2024) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 8200 Ultimate, while the Vivo iQOO 16 (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Extreme Gen 6. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo iQOO 16 leads — 89/100 vs 65/100 (a 24-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo iQOO 16 has the bigger battery (8400 mAh vs 5000); the Vivo iQOO 16 is faster in AnTuTu (5,498,720 vs 1,230,893); the Tecno Camon 30 Pro is noticeably lighter (188g vs 223g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Tecno Camon 30 Pro
Vivo iQOO 16
What makes Tecno Camon 30 Pro better?
- Lighter: 188g vs 223g
- Better portability (70/100 vs 42/100)
What makes Vivo iQOO 16 better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 5498720 vs 1230893
- Better Geekbench Single: 4327 vs 1256
- Better Geekbench Multi: 12873 vs 4207
- Bigger battery: 8400 vs 5000 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 70W
- Higher refresh rate: 165Hz vs 144Hz
- Higher performance (100/100 vs 65/100)
- Better camera (78/100 vs 60/100)
- Longer battery life (90/100 vs 53/100)
- Better display (99/100 vs 89/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Tecno Camon 30 Pro vs the Vivo iQOO 16, the Vivo iQOO 16 scores 24 points higher (89/100 vs 65/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 leads (100/100 vs 65/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 leads (78/100 vs 60/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 leads (90/100 vs 53/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon 30 Pro (100/100 vs 65/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 is a bit better (99/100 vs 89/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 notably outperforms the Tecno Camon 30 Pro (78/100 vs 60/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon 30 Pro (90/100 vs 53/100). In the "portability" category, the Tecno Camon 30 Pro notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO 16 (70/100 vs 42/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Tecno Camon 30 Pro | Vivo iQOO 16 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 8200 Ultimate | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Extreme Gen 6 | |
| AnTuTu | 1230893 | 5498720 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1256 | 4327 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 4207 | 12873 | |
| Display | 6.8" AMOLED | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2436 | 1440x3168 | |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 165 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 8400 mAh | |
| Charging | 70W | 100W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 40W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 14, up to 2 major Android upgrades, HIOS 14 | Android 17 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 6000 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP68/IP69 | |
| Dimensions | 164.0×74.5×7.7 mm | 163.8×76.9×8.3 mm | |
| Weight | 188 g | 223 g | |
| Launch price | — | $840 |
Camera comparison
Tecno Camon 30 Pro
- Main: 50MP f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Vivo iQOO 16
- Main: 50MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Tecno Camon 30 Pro
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2436
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Vivo iQOO 16
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1440x3168
- Refresh rate: 165 Hz
Battery and charging
Tecno Camon 30 Pro
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 70W
- No wireless charging
Vivo iQOO 16
- 8400 mAh
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 40W
Overall performance score
We compared Tecno Camon 30 Pro and Vivo iQOO 16, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo iQOO 16 leads Tecno Camon 30 Pro by 77.6% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Tecno Camon 30 Pro
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon 30 Pro (100/100 vs 65/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 is a bit better (99/100 vs 89/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 notably outperforms the Tecno Camon 30 Pro (78/100 vs 60/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon 30 Pro (90/100 vs 53/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Tecno Camon 30 Pro notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO 16 (70/100 vs 42/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Tecno Camon 30 Pro or the Vivo iQOO 16?
The Vivo iQOO 16 significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon 30 Pro by 24 points (89/100 vs 65/100).
What is the rating of the Tecno Camon 30 Pro and the Vivo iQOO 16?
The Tecno Camon 30 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 65/100, the Vivo iQOO 16 — 89/100.
Which has the better camera: the Tecno Camon 30 Pro or the Vivo iQOO 16?
The Vivo iQOO 16 leads on camera score (78/100 vs 60/100).
Which is more powerful: the Tecno Camon 30 Pro or the Vivo iQOO 16?
The Vivo iQOO 16 leads on performance (100/100 vs 65/100).
Should you choose the Tecno Camon 30 Pro over the Vivo iQOO 16?
The Tecno Camon 30 Pro is a better fit for active users. The Vivo iQOO 16 is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.