Tecno Camon 40 Premier vs Vivo Y300 (China)
The Tecno Camon 40 Premier (2025) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 8350, while the Vivo Y300 (China) (2024) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 6300. By overall MobileRank rating, the Tecno Camon 40 Premier leads — 52/100 vs 31/100 (a 21-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo Y300 (China) has the bigger battery (6500 mAh vs 5100); the Tecno Camon 40 Premier is faster in AnTuTu (1,724,757 vs 524,785); the Tecno Camon 40 Premier has NFC for contactless payments, the Vivo Y300 (China) doesn't.
Tecno Camon 40 Premier
Vivo Y300 (China)
- Higher AnTuTu: 1724757 vs 524785
- Better Geekbench Single: 1398 vs 771
- Better Geekbench Multi: 4313 vs 1980
- Faster charging: 70W vs 44W
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Higher performance (21/100 vs 0/100)
- Better camera (78/100 vs 24/100)
- Bigger battery: 6500 vs 5100 mAh
- Longer battery life (54/100 vs 51/100)
Comparing the Tecno Camon 40 Premier vs the Vivo Y300 (China), the Tecno Camon 40 Premier scores 21 points higher (52/100 vs 31/100). In the "performance" category, the Tecno Camon 40 Premier leads (21/100 vs 0/100). In the "camera" category, the Tecno Camon 40 Premier leads (78/100 vs 24/100). In the "performance" category, the Tecno Camon 40 Premier notably outperforms the Vivo Y300 (China) (21/100 vs 0/100). In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100. In the "camera" category, the Tecno Camon 40 Premier significantly outperforms the Vivo Y300 (China) (78/100 vs 24/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y300 (China) and the Tecno Camon 40 Premier are nearly equal (54/100 vs 51/100). In the "design" category, both devices are on the same level — 50/100. In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
| Specification | Tecno Camon 40 Premier | Vivo Y300 (China) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 8350 | MediaTek Dimensity 6300 | |
| AnTuTu | 1724757 | 524785 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1398 | 771 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 4313 | 1980 | |
| Display | 6.7" LTPO AMOLED | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1260x2800 | 1080x2392 | |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5100 mAh | 6500 mAh | |
| Charging | 70W | 44W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 0 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 8 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 8GB / 12GB | |
| Storage | 256GB | 128GB / 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 15, HIOS 15 | Android 15, OriginOS 5 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 1800 nits | |
| NFC | yes | no | |
| Protection | — | IP64 | |
| Dimensions | 161.0×75.0×7.7 mm | 163.6×76.2×7.8 mm | |
| Weight | — | 200 g | |
| Price | — | — |
Tecno Camon 40 Premier
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Vivo Y300 (China)
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 8MP
Tecno Camon 40 Premier
- 6.7" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 1260x2800
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Vivo Y300 (China)
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2392
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Tecno Camon 40 Premier
- 5100 mAh
- Wired: 70W
- No wireless charging
Vivo Y300 (China)
- 6500 mAh
- Wired: 44W
- No wireless charging
We compared Tecno Camon 40 Premier and Vivo Y300 (China), covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Tecno Camon 40 Premier leads Vivo Y300 (China) by 228.7% in our overall performance rating.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Tecno Camon 40 Premier notably outperforms the Vivo Y300 (China) (21/100 vs 0/100).
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, the Tecno Camon 40 Premier significantly outperforms the Vivo Y300 (China) (78/100 vs 24/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y300 (China) and the Tecno Camon 40 Premier are nearly equal (54/100 vs 51/100).
design
In the "design" category, both devices are on the same level — 50/100.
value for money
In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
Which is better: the Tecno Camon 40 Premier or the Vivo Y300 (China)?
The Tecno Camon 40 Premier significantly outperforms the Vivo Y300 (China) by 21 points (52/100 vs 31/100).
What is the rating of the Tecno Camon 40 Premier and the Vivo Y300 (China)?
The Tecno Camon 40 Premier has a MobileRank rating of 52/100, the Vivo Y300 (China) — 31/100.
Which has the better camera: the Tecno Camon 40 Premier or the Vivo Y300 (China)?
The Tecno Camon 40 Premier leads on camera score (78/100 vs 24/100).
Which is more powerful: the Tecno Camon 40 Premier or the Vivo Y300 (China)?
The Tecno Camon 40 Premier leads on performance (21/100 vs 0/100).
Should you choose the Tecno Camon 40 Premier over the Vivo Y300 (China)?
The Tecno Camon 40 Premier is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo Y300 (China) is a better fit for everyday use.