Tecno Pova 7 Ultra vs Vivo Y300 (China)
The Tecno Pova 7 Ultra (2025) runs on the Dimensity 8350 Ultimate, while the Vivo Y300 (China) (2024) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 6300. By overall MobileRank rating, the Tecno Pova 7 Ultra leads — 65/100 vs 48/100 (a 17-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo Y300 (China) has the bigger battery (6500 mAh vs 6000); the main camera is 108 MP vs 50 MP; the Tecno Pova 7 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (1,673,316 vs 528,398); the Tecno Pova 7 Ultra has NFC for contactless payments, the Vivo Y300 (China) doesn't; the Vivo Y300 (China) is thinner (7.8mm vs 8.9mm).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Tecno Pova 7 Ultra
Vivo Y300 (China)
What makes Tecno Pova 7 Ultra better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 1673316 vs 528398
- Better Geekbench Single: 1398 vs 771
- Better Geekbench Multi: 4313 vs 1980
- Faster charging: 70W vs 44W
- Better main camera: 108MP vs 50MP
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Higher performance (69/100 vs 43/100)
- Better camera (43/100 vs 30/100)
- Longer battery life (72/100 vs 58/100)
- Better display (94/100 vs 79/100)
What makes Vivo Y300 (China) better?
- Bigger battery: 6500 vs 6000 mAh
- Lighter: 200g vs 209g
- Better portability (61/100 vs 44/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Tecno Pova 7 Ultra vs the Vivo Y300 (China), the Tecno Pova 7 Ultra scores 17 points higher (65/100 vs 48/100). In the "performance" category, the Tecno Pova 7 Ultra leads (69/100 vs 43/100). In the "camera" category, the Tecno Pova 7 Ultra leads (43/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Tecno Pova 7 Ultra leads (72/100 vs 58/100). In the "performance" category, the Tecno Pova 7 Ultra notably outperforms the Vivo Y300 (China) (69/100 vs 43/100). In the "display" category, the Tecno Pova 7 Ultra notably outperforms the Vivo Y300 (China) (94/100 vs 79/100). In the "camera" category, the Tecno Pova 7 Ultra is a bit better (43/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Tecno Pova 7 Ultra is a bit better (72/100 vs 58/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo Y300 (China) notably outperforms the Tecno Pova 7 Ultra (61/100 vs 44/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Tecno Pova 7 Ultra | Vivo Y300 (China) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Dimensity 8350 Ultimate | MediaTek Dimensity 6300 | |
| AnTuTu | 1673316 | 528398 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1398 | 771 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 4313 | 1980 | |
| Display | 6.7" AMOLED | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1260x2800 | 1080x2392 | |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 6000 mAh | 6500 mAh | |
| Charging | 70W | 44W | |
| Wireless charging | 30W | 0W | |
| Main camera | 108 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 13 MP | 8 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB / 12GB | 8GB / 12GB | |
| Storage | 256GB | 128GB / 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 15 / HIOS 15 | Android 15, OriginOS 5 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 4500 nits | 1800 nits | |
| NFC | yes | no | |
| Protection | IP64 | IP64 | |
| Dimensions | 160.0×75.2×8.9 mm | 163.6×76.2×7.8 mm | |
| Weight | 209 g | 200 g | |
| Launch price | $300 | — |
Camera comparison
Tecno Pova 7 Ultra
- Main: 108MP
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 13MP
Vivo Y300 (China)
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Front: 8MP
Display comparison
Tecno Pova 7 Ultra
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1260x2800
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Vivo Y300 (China)
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2392
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Tecno Pova 7 Ultra
- 6000 mAh
- Wired: 70W
- Wireless: 30W
Vivo Y300 (China)
- 6500 mAh
- Wired: 44W
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Tecno Pova 7 Ultra and Vivo Y300 (China), covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Tecno Pova 7 Ultra leads Vivo Y300 (China) by 216.7% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Vivo Y300 (China)
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Tecno Pova 7 Ultra notably outperforms the Vivo Y300 (China) (69/100 vs 43/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Tecno Pova 7 Ultra notably outperforms the Vivo Y300 (China) (94/100 vs 79/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Tecno Pova 7 Ultra is a bit better (43/100 vs 30/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Tecno Pova 7 Ultra is a bit better (72/100 vs 58/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Vivo Y300 (China) notably outperforms the Tecno Pova 7 Ultra (61/100 vs 44/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Tecno Pova 7 Ultra or the Vivo Y300 (China)?
The Tecno Pova 7 Ultra is noticeably better than the Vivo Y300 (China) — the overall rating gap is 17 points.
What is the rating of the Tecno Pova 7 Ultra and the Vivo Y300 (China)?
The Tecno Pova 7 Ultra has a MobileRank rating of 65/100, the Vivo Y300 (China) — 48/100.
Which has the better camera: the Tecno Pova 7 Ultra or the Vivo Y300 (China)?
The Tecno Pova 7 Ultra leads on camera score (43/100 vs 30/100).
Which is more powerful: the Tecno Pova 7 Ultra or the Vivo Y300 (China)?
The Tecno Pova 7 Ultra leads on performance (69/100 vs 43/100).
Should you choose the Tecno Pova 7 Ultra over the Vivo Y300 (China)?
The Tecno Pova 7 Ultra is a better fit for active users.