Tecno Pova 7 Ultra vs Vivo Y300 (China)

The Tecno Pova 7 Ultra (2025) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 8350 Ultimate, while the Vivo Y300 (China) (2024) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 6300. By overall MobileRank rating, the Tecno Pova 7 Ultra leads — 44/100 vs 31/100 (a 13-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo Y300 (China) has the bigger battery (6500 mAh vs 6000); the main camera is 108 MP vs 50 MP; the Tecno Pova 7 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (1,700,848 vs 524,785); the Tecno Pova 7 Ultra has NFC for contactless payments, the Vivo Y300 (China) doesn't; the Vivo Y300 (China) is thinner (7.8mm vs 8.9mm).

The Tecno Pova 7 Ultra is noticeably better than the Vivo Y300 (China) — the overall rating gap is 13 points.
Profile comparison
Category scores
Tecno Pova 7 Ultra
Performance 21
Display 100
Camera 40
Battery 63
Design 50
Value for money 55
Vivo Y300 (China)
Performance 0
Display 100
Camera 24
Battery 54
Design 50
Value for money 55
What makes Tecno Pova 7 Ultra better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 1700848 vs 524785
  • Better Geekbench Single: 1398 vs 771
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 4313 vs 1980
  • Faster charging: 70W vs 44W
  • Better main camera: 108MP vs 50MP
  • Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz

  • Higher performance (21/100 vs 0/100)
  • Better camera (40/100 vs 24/100)
  • Longer battery life (63/100 vs 54/100)
What makes Vivo Y300 (China) better?
  • Bigger battery: 6500 vs 6000 mAh

  • Overall rating 31/100
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Tecno Pova 7 Ultra vs the Vivo Y300 (China), the Tecno Pova 7 Ultra scores 13 points higher (44/100 vs 31/100). In the "performance" category, the Tecno Pova 7 Ultra leads (21/100 vs 0/100). In the "camera" category, the Tecno Pova 7 Ultra leads (40/100 vs 24/100). In the "performance" category, the Tecno Pova 7 Ultra notably outperforms the Vivo Y300 (China) (21/100 vs 0/100). In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100. In the "camera" category, the Tecno Pova 7 Ultra notably outperforms the Vivo Y300 (China) (40/100 vs 24/100). In the "battery" category, the Tecno Pova 7 Ultra is a bit better (63/100 vs 54/100). In the "design" category, both devices are on the same level — 50/100. In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.

Tecno Pova 7 Ultra: The Tecno Pova 7 Ultra is a better fit for everyday use.
Vivo Y300 (China): The Vivo Y300 (China) is a better fit for everyday use.
Specs comparison
Specification Tecno Pova 7 Ultra Vivo Y300 (China)
Processor MediaTek Dimensity 8350 Ultimate MediaTek Dimensity 6300
AnTuTu 1700848 524785
Geekbench Single 1398 771
Geekbench Multi 4313 1980
Display 6.7" AMOLED 6.8" AMOLED
Resolution 1260x2800 1080x2392
Refresh rate 144 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 6000 mAh 6500 mAh
Charging 70W 44W
Wireless charging 30W 0W
Main camera 108 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 8 MP 0 MP
Front camera 13 MP 8 MP
RAM 8GB / 12GB 8GB / 12GB
Storage 256GB 128GB / 256GB / 512GB
OS Android 15, HIOS 15 Android 15, OriginOS 5
Brightness (peak) 4500 nits 1800 nits
NFC yes no
Protection IP64 IP64
Dimensions 160.0×75.2×8.9 mm 163.6×76.2×7.8 mm
Weight 200 g
Price
Camera comparison
Tecno Pova 7 Ultra
  • Main: 108MP
  • Ultrawide: 8MP
  • Front: 13MP
40
camera
Vivo Y300 (China)
  • Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
  • Front: 8MP
24
camera
Display comparison
Tecno Pova 7 Ultra
  • 6.7" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1260x2800
  • Refresh rate: 144 Hz
100
display
Vivo Y300 (China)
  • 6.8" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1080x2392
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
100
display
Battery and charging
Tecno Pova 7 Ultra
  • 6000 mAh
  • Wired: 70W
  • Wireless: 30W
63
battery
Vivo Y300 (China)
  • 6500 mAh
  • Wired: 44W
  • No wireless charging
54
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Tecno Pova 7 Ultra and Vivo Y300 (China), covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Tecno Pova 7 Ultra MediaTek Dimensity 8350 Ultimate
44/100
1700848 AnTuTu
Vivo Y300 (China) MediaTek Dimensity 6300
31/100 -224.1%
524785 AnTuTu

Tecno Pova 7 Ultra leads Vivo Y300 (China) by 224.1% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Tecno Pova 7 Ultra notably outperforms the Vivo Y300 (China) (21/100 vs 0/100).

display

In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.

camera

In the "camera" category, the Tecno Pova 7 Ultra notably outperforms the Vivo Y300 (China) (40/100 vs 24/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Tecno Pova 7 Ultra is a bit better (63/100 vs 54/100).

design

In the "design" category, both devices are on the same level — 50/100.

value for money

In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Tecno Pova 7 Ultra or the Vivo Y300 (China)?

The Tecno Pova 7 Ultra is noticeably better than the Vivo Y300 (China) — the overall rating gap is 13 points.

What is the rating of the Tecno Pova 7 Ultra and the Vivo Y300 (China)?

The Tecno Pova 7 Ultra has a MobileRank rating of 44/100, the Vivo Y300 (China) — 31/100.

Which has the better camera: the Tecno Pova 7 Ultra or the Vivo Y300 (China)?

The Tecno Pova 7 Ultra leads on camera score (40/100 vs 24/100).

Which is more powerful: the Tecno Pova 7 Ultra or the Vivo Y300 (China)?

The Tecno Pova 7 Ultra leads on performance (21/100 vs 0/100).

Should you choose the Tecno Pova 7 Ultra over the Vivo Y300 (China)?

The Tecno Pova 7 Ultra is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo Y300 (China) is a better fit for everyday use.