Tecno Camon 50 Pro vs Vivo Y300 (China)
The Tecno Camon 50 Pro (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 7400 Ultimate, while the Vivo Y300 (China) (2024) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 6300. By overall MobileRank rating, the Tecno Camon 50 Pro leads — 65/100 vs 48/100 (a 17-point difference). Key differences: the Tecno Camon 50 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (1,059,715 vs 528,398); the Tecno Camon 50 Pro has NFC for contactless payments, the Vivo Y300 (China) doesn't.
Profile comparison
Category scores
Tecno Camon 50 Pro
Vivo Y300 (China)
What makes Tecno Camon 50 Pro better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 1059715 vs 528398
- Better Geekbench Single: 1061 vs 771
- Better Geekbench Multi: 3185 vs 1980
- Faster charging: 45W vs 44W
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Higher performance (59/100 vs 43/100)
- Better camera (64/100 vs 30/100)
- Better display (92/100 vs 79/100)
- Better portability (64/100 vs 61/100)
What makes Vivo Y300 (China) better?
- Overall rating 48/100
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Tecno Camon 50 Pro vs the Vivo Y300 (China), the Tecno Camon 50 Pro scores 17 points higher (65/100 vs 48/100). In the "performance" category, the Tecno Camon 50 Pro leads (59/100 vs 43/100). In the "camera" category, the Tecno Camon 50 Pro leads (64/100 vs 30/100). In the "performance" category, the Tecno Camon 50 Pro notably outperforms the Vivo Y300 (China) (59/100 vs 43/100). In the "display" category, the Tecno Camon 50 Pro is a bit better (92/100 vs 79/100). In the "camera" category, the Tecno Camon 50 Pro significantly outperforms the Vivo Y300 (China) (64/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, both devices are on the same level — 58/100. In the "portability" category, the Tecno Camon 50 Pro and the Vivo Y300 (China) are nearly equal (64/100 vs 61/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Tecno Camon 50 Pro | Vivo Y300 (China) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 7400 Ultimate | MediaTek Dimensity 6300 | |
| AnTuTu | 1059715 | 528398 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1061 | 771 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 3185 | 1980 | |
| Display | 6.8" AMOLED | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1208x2644 | 1080x2392 | |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 6500 mAh | 6500 mAh | |
| Charging | 45W | 44W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 0 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 8 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB / 12GB | 8GB / 12GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 128GB / 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 16, up to 3 major Android upgrades, HIOS 16 | Android 15, OriginOS 5 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 1800 nits | |
| NFC | yes | no | |
| Protection | IP68 | IP64 | |
| Dimensions | 162.4×77.0×7.8 mm | 163.6×76.2×7.8 mm | |
| Weight | — | 200 g | |
| Launch price | $320 | — |
Camera comparison
Tecno Camon 50 Pro
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Vivo Y300 (China)
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Front: 8MP
Display comparison
Tecno Camon 50 Pro
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1208x2644
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Vivo Y300 (China)
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2392
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Tecno Camon 50 Pro
- 6500 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- No wireless charging
Vivo Y300 (China)
- 6500 mAh
- Wired: 44W
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Tecno Camon 50 Pro and Vivo Y300 (China), covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Tecno Camon 50 Pro leads Vivo Y300 (China) by 100.6% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Vivo Y300 (China)
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Tecno Camon 50 Pro notably outperforms the Vivo Y300 (China) (59/100 vs 43/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Tecno Camon 50 Pro is a bit better (92/100 vs 79/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Tecno Camon 50 Pro significantly outperforms the Vivo Y300 (China) (64/100 vs 30/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, both devices are on the same level — 58/100.
portability
In the "portability" category, the Tecno Camon 50 Pro and the Vivo Y300 (China) are nearly equal (64/100 vs 61/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Tecno Camon 50 Pro or the Vivo Y300 (China)?
The Tecno Camon 50 Pro is noticeably better than the Vivo Y300 (China) — the overall rating gap is 17 points.
What is the rating of the Tecno Camon 50 Pro and the Vivo Y300 (China)?
The Tecno Camon 50 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 65/100, the Vivo Y300 (China) — 48/100.
Which has the better camera: the Tecno Camon 50 Pro or the Vivo Y300 (China)?
The Tecno Camon 50 Pro leads on camera score (64/100 vs 30/100).
Which is more powerful: the Tecno Camon 50 Pro or the Vivo Y300 (China)?
The Tecno Camon 50 Pro leads on performance (59/100 vs 43/100).
Should you choose the Tecno Camon 50 Pro over the Vivo Y300 (China)?
Neither model stands out enough to recommend it for a specific use case: the clearest difference is camera — better on the Tecno Camon 50 Pro (64/100 vs 30/100).