Tecno Camon 30 Pro vs Vivo Y300 (China)

The Tecno Camon 30 Pro (2024) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 8200 Ultimate, while the Vivo Y300 (China) (2024) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 6300. By overall MobileRank rating, the Tecno Camon 30 Pro leads — 65/100 vs 48/100 (a 17-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo Y300 (China) has the bigger battery (6500 mAh vs 5000); the Tecno Camon 30 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (1,203,771 vs 524,785); the Tecno Camon 30 Pro has NFC for contactless payments, the Vivo Y300 (China) doesn't.

The Tecno Camon 30 Pro is noticeably better than the Vivo Y300 (China) — the overall rating gap is 17 points.
Profile comparison
Category scores
Tecno Camon 30 Pro
Performance 64
Display 89
Camera 60
Battery 53
Portability 70
Value for money
Vivo Y300 (China)
Performance 43
Display 79
Camera 30
Battery 58
Portability 61
Value for money
What makes Tecno Camon 30 Pro better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 1203771 vs 524785
  • Better Geekbench Single: 1256 vs 771
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 4207 vs 1980
  • Faster charging: 70W vs 44W
  • Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
  • Lighter: 188g vs 200g

  • Higher performance (64/100 vs 43/100)
  • Better camera (60/100 vs 30/100)
  • Better display (89/100 vs 79/100)
  • Better portability (70/100 vs 61/100)
What makes Vivo Y300 (China) better?
  • Bigger battery: 6500 vs 5000 mAh

  • Longer battery life (58/100 vs 53/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Tecno Camon 30 Pro vs the Vivo Y300 (China), the Tecno Camon 30 Pro scores 17 points higher (65/100 vs 48/100). In the "performance" category, the Tecno Camon 30 Pro leads (64/100 vs 43/100). In the "camera" category, the Tecno Camon 30 Pro leads (60/100 vs 30/100). In the "performance" category, the Tecno Camon 30 Pro notably outperforms the Vivo Y300 (China) (64/100 vs 43/100). In the "display" category, the Tecno Camon 30 Pro is a bit better (89/100 vs 79/100). In the "camera" category, the Tecno Camon 30 Pro significantly outperforms the Vivo Y300 (China) (60/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y300 (China) is a bit better (58/100 vs 53/100). In the "portability" category, the Tecno Camon 30 Pro is a bit better (70/100 vs 61/100).

Tecno Camon 30 Pro: The Tecno Camon 30 Pro is a better fit for active users.
Vivo Y300 (China): The Vivo Y300 (China) is a better fit for everyday use.
Specs comparison
Specification Tecno Camon 30 Pro Vivo Y300 (China)
Processor MediaTek Dimensity 8200 Ultimate MediaTek Dimensity 6300
AnTuTu 1203771 524785
Geekbench Single 1256 771
Geekbench Multi 4207 1980
Display 6.8" AMOLED 6.8" AMOLED
Resolution 1080x2436 1080x2392
Refresh rate 144 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 5000 mAh 6500 mAh
Charging 70W 44W
Main camera 50 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 50 MP 0 MP
Front camera 50 MP 8 MP
RAM 12GB 8GB / 12GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB 128GB / 256GB / 512GB
OS Android 14, up to 2 major Android upgrades, HIOS 14 Android 15, OriginOS 5
Brightness (peak) 1800 nits
NFC yes no
Protection IP64
Dimensions 164.0×74.5×7.7 mm 163.6×76.2×7.8 mm
Weight 188 g 200 g
Launch price
Camera comparison
Tecno Camon 30 Pro
  • Main: 50MP f/f/1.9
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Front: 50MP
60
camera
Vivo Y300 (China)
  • Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
  • Front: 8MP
30
camera
Display comparison
Tecno Camon 30 Pro
  • 6.8" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1080x2436
  • Refresh rate: 144 Hz
89
display
Vivo Y300 (China)
  • 6.8" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1080x2392
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
79
display
Battery and charging
Tecno Camon 30 Pro
  • 5000 mAh
  • Wired: 70W
  • No wireless charging
53
battery
Vivo Y300 (China)
  • 6500 mAh
  • Wired: 44W
  • No wireless charging
58
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Tecno Camon 30 Pro and Vivo Y300 (China), covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Tecno Camon 30 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 8200 Ultimate
65/100
1203771 AnTuTu
Vivo Y300 (China) MediaTek Dimensity 6300
48/100 -129.4%
524785 AnTuTu

Tecno Camon 30 Pro leads Vivo Y300 (China) by 129.4% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Tecno Camon 30 Pro notably outperforms the Vivo Y300 (China) (64/100 vs 43/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Tecno Camon 30 Pro is a bit better (89/100 vs 79/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Tecno Camon 30 Pro significantly outperforms the Vivo Y300 (China) (60/100 vs 30/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y300 (China) is a bit better (58/100 vs 53/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Tecno Camon 30 Pro is a bit better (70/100 vs 61/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Tecno Camon 30 Pro or the Vivo Y300 (China)?

The Tecno Camon 30 Pro is noticeably better than the Vivo Y300 (China) — the overall rating gap is 17 points.

What is the rating of the Tecno Camon 30 Pro and the Vivo Y300 (China)?

The Tecno Camon 30 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 65/100, the Vivo Y300 (China) — 48/100.

Which has the better camera: the Tecno Camon 30 Pro or the Vivo Y300 (China)?

The Tecno Camon 30 Pro leads on camera score (60/100 vs 30/100).

Which is more powerful: the Tecno Camon 30 Pro or the Vivo Y300 (China)?

The Tecno Camon 30 Pro leads on performance (64/100 vs 43/100).

Should you choose the Tecno Camon 30 Pro over the Vivo Y300 (China)?

The Tecno Camon 30 Pro is a better fit for active users. The Vivo Y300 (China) is a better fit for everyday use.