Realme 14T vs Vivo Y300 (China)
The Realme 14T (2025) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 6300, while the Vivo Y300 (China) (2024) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 6300. By overall MobileRank rating, the Realme 14T leads — 34/100 vs 31/100 (a 3-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo Y300 (China) has the bigger battery (6500 mAh vs 6000); the Realme 14T has NFC for contactless payments, the Vivo Y300 (China) doesn't.
Realme 14T
Vivo Y300 (China)
- Faster charging: 45W vs 44W
- Lighter: 196g vs 200g
- Better camera (27/100 vs 24/100)
- Better design/ergonomics (55/100 vs 50/100)
- Better value for money (95/100 vs 55/100)
- Bigger battery: 6500 vs 6000 mAh
- Longer battery life (54/100 vs 51/100)
Comparing the Realme 14T vs the Vivo Y300 (China), the Realme 14T scores 3 points higher (34/100 vs 31/100). In the "value for money" category, the Realme 14T leads (95/100 vs 55/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100. In the "camera" category, the Realme 14T and the Vivo Y300 (China) are nearly equal (27/100 vs 24/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y300 (China) and the Realme 14T are nearly equal (54/100 vs 51/100). In the "design" category, the Realme 14T is a bit better (55/100 vs 50/100). In the "value for money" category, the Realme 14T significantly outperforms the Vivo Y300 (China) (95/100 vs 55/100).
| Specification | Realme 14T | Vivo Y300 (China) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 6300 | MediaTek Dimensity 6300 | |
| AnTuTu | 524785 | 524785 | |
| Geekbench Single | 771 | 771 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 1980 | 1980 | |
| Display | 6.7" AMOLED | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 | 1080x2392 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 6000 mAh | 6500 mAh | |
| Charging | 45W | 44W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 8 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB / 12GB | 8GB / 12GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 128GB / 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 15, OriginOS 5 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 1800 nits | |
| NFC | yes | no | |
| Protection | IP68 | IP64 | |
| Dimensions | 163.1×75.6×7.9 mm | 163.6×76.2×7.8 mm | |
| Weight | 196 g | 200 g | |
| Price | $215 | — |
Realme 14T
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 16MP
Vivo Y300 (China)
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 8MP
Realme 14T
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo Y300 (China)
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2392
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Realme 14T
- 6000 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- No wireless charging
Vivo Y300 (China)
- 6500 mAh
- Wired: 44W
- No wireless charging
We compared Realme 14T and Vivo Y300 (China), covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Equal performance based on benchmark results.
Vivo Y300 (China)
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, the Realme 14T and the Vivo Y300 (China) are nearly equal (27/100 vs 24/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y300 (China) and the Realme 14T are nearly equal (54/100 vs 51/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Realme 14T is a bit better (55/100 vs 50/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Realme 14T significantly outperforms the Vivo Y300 (China) (95/100 vs 55/100).
Which is better: the Realme 14T or the Vivo Y300 (China)?
The Realme 14T edges out the Vivo Y300 (China) by just 3 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Realme 14T and the Vivo Y300 (China)?
The Realme 14T has a MobileRank rating of 34/100, the Vivo Y300 (China) — 31/100.
Should you choose the Realme 14T over the Vivo Y300 (China)?
The Realme 14T is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers. The Vivo Y300 (China) is a better fit for everyday use.